• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

衡量孕期护理:迈向更优质的母婴健康

Measuring pregnancy care: towards better maternal and child health.

作者信息

Sinni Suzanne V, Cross Wendy M, Swanson Amy E, Wallace Euan M

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

Monash Women's Services, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016 Apr;56(2):142-7. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12441. Epub 2016 Feb 3.

DOI:10.1111/ajo.12441
PMID:26840745
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5067656/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Obstetrics remains the largest medico-legal liability in healthcare. Neither an increasing awareness of patient safety nor a long tradition of reporting obstetric outcomes have reduced either rates of medical error or obstetric litigation. International debate continues about the best approaches to measuring and improving patient safety. In this study, we set out to assess the feasibility and utility of measuring the process of maternity care provision rather than care outcomes.

AIMS

To report the development, application and results of a tool designed to measure the process of maternity care.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A dedicated audit tool was developed, informed by local, national and international standards guiding best practice and then applied to a convenience sample of individual healthcare records as proof of function. Omissions of care were rated in order of severity (low, medium or high) based on the likelihood of serious consequences on patient safety and outcome.

RESULTS

The rate of high severity omissions of care was less that 2%. However, overall rates of all omissions varied from 0 to 99%, highlighting key areas for clinical practice improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Measuring process of care provision, rather than pregnancy outcomes, is feasible and insightful, effectively identifying gaps in care provision and affording opportunities for targeted care improvement. This approach to improving patient safety, and potentially reducing litigation burden, promises to be a useful adjunct to the measurement of outcomes.

摘要

背景

在医疗保健领域,产科仍然是最大的医疗法律责任领域。无论是对患者安全意识的提高,还是长期以来报告产科结局的传统,都未能降低医疗差错率或产科诉讼率。关于衡量和提高患者安全的最佳方法的国际辩论仍在继续。在本研究中,我们着手评估衡量产科护理过程而非护理结局的可行性和实用性。

目的

报告一种旨在衡量产科护理过程的工具的开发、应用及结果。

材料与方法

在指导最佳实践的地方、国家和国际标准的基础上,开发了一种专门的审计工具,然后将其应用于个体医疗保健记录的便利样本,以证明其功能。根据对患者安全和结局产生严重后果的可能性,将护理遗漏按严重程度(低、中或高)进行评级。

结果

严重护理遗漏率低于2%。然而,所有遗漏的总体发生率从0%到99%不等,突出了临床实践改进的关键领域。

结论

衡量护理过程而非妊娠结局是可行且有洞察力的,能有效识别护理提供中的差距,并为有针对性的护理改进提供机会。这种提高患者安全并可能减轻诉讼负担的方法有望成为结局测量的有益补充。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a592/5067656/c2c4521f1e5e/AJO-56-142-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a592/5067656/c2c4521f1e5e/AJO-56-142-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a592/5067656/c2c4521f1e5e/AJO-56-142-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Measuring pregnancy care: towards better maternal and child health.衡量孕期护理:迈向更优质的母婴健康
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016 Apr;56(2):142-7. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12441. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
2
Developing a best practice model of refugee maternity care.制定难民产妇护理最佳实践模式。
Women Birth. 2012 Mar;25(1):13-22. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2011.01.002. Epub 2011 Feb 11.
3
A story of scrutiny and fear: Australian midwives' experiences of an external review of obstetric services, being involved with litigation and the impact on clinical practice.审视与恐惧的故事:澳大利亚助产士对外科产科服务审查的经历、参与诉讼及其对临床实践的影响。
Midwifery. 2010 Jun;26(3):268-85. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2008.07.008. Epub 2008 Sep 19.
4
Systematic approaches to adverse events in obstetrics, Part I: Event identification and classification.系统方法在产科不良事件中的应用,第一部分:事件识别和分类。
Semin Perinatol. 2017 Apr;41(3):151-155. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2017.03.003. Epub 2017 May 23.
5
The preliminary development and testing of a global trigger tool to detect error and patient harm in primary-care records.用于检测初级保健记录中的差错和患者伤害的全球触发工具的初步开发与测试。
Postgrad Med J. 2009 Apr;85(1002):176-80. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2008.075788.
6
A national audit to monitor and promote the uptake of clinical guidelines on the management of diabetes in pregnancy.
Clin Perform Qual Health Care. 2000;8(1):28-34. doi: 10.1108/14664100010332991.
7
Simulation in maternal-fetal medicine: making a case for the need.母胎医学模拟:需求论证。
Semin Perinatol. 2013 Jun;37(3):140-2. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2013.02.002.
8
Telemedicine for the Medicare population: pediatric, obstetric, and clinician-indirect home interventions.面向医疗保险人群的远程医疗:儿科、产科及临床医生间接居家干预措施
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ). 2001 Aug(24 Suppl):1-32.
9
Audit in obstetrics.产科审计
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Aug;8(4):296-9.
10
Implementation of the findings of a national enquiry into the misdiagnosis of miscarriage in the Republic of Ireland: impact on quality of clinical care.爱尔兰共和国关于流产误诊的全国性调查结果的实施:对临床护理质量的影响。
Fertil Steril. 2016 Feb;105(2):417-22. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.11.002. Epub 2015 Nov 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Equity in maternal, newborn, and child health interventions in Countdown to 2015: a retrospective review of survey data from 54 countries.倒计时 2015 年母婴儿童健康干预中的公平性:54 个国家调查数据的回顾性分析。
Lancet. 2012 Mar 31;379(9822):1225-33. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60113-5.
2
Disparities in interventions for child and maternal mortality.儿童和孕产妇死亡率干预措施的差异。
Lancet. 2012 Mar 31;379(9822):1178-80. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60474-7.
3
Outpatient adverse drug events identified by screening electronic health records.
通过筛选电子健康记录识别的门诊药物不良事件。
J Patient Saf. 2010 Jun;6(2):91-6. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0b013e3181dcae06.
4
Reporting of hazards and near-misses in the ambulatory care setting.门诊护理环境中危害及险兆事件的报告
J Nurs Care Qual. 2011 Oct-Dec;26(4):328-34. doi: 10.1097/NCQ.0b013e3182109204.
5
Patient safety: a literature review to inform an evaluation of a maternity service.患者安全:文献综述,为评估产科服务提供信息。
Midwifery. 2011 Dec;27(6):e274-8. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2010.11.001. Epub 2010 Dec 13.
6
Viewing health care delivery as science: challenges, benefits, and policy implications.将医疗保健服务视为科学:挑战、益处和政策影响。
Health Serv Res. 2010 Oct;45(5 Pt 2):1508-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01144.x. Epub 2010 Aug 2.
7
Measuring preventable harm: helping science keep pace with policy.衡量可预防的伤害:助力科学跟上政策步伐。
JAMA. 2009 Mar 25;301(12):1273-5. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.388.
8
Criterion-based clinical audit in obstetrics: bridging the quality gap?基于标准的产科临床审计:弥合质量差距?
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2009 Jun;23(3):375-88. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2009.01.017. Epub 2009 Mar 18.
9
The SQUIRE (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence) guidelines for quality improvement reporting: explanation and elaboration.质量改进报告的SQUIRE(卓越质量改进报告标准)指南:解释与详述
Qual Saf Health Care. 2008 Oct;17 Suppl 1(Suppl_1):i13-32. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2008.029058.
10
The incidence and nature of in-hospital adverse events: a systematic review.住院不良事件的发生率及性质:一项系统综述
Qual Saf Health Care. 2008 Jun;17(3):216-23. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.023622.