Fournier Philippe, Hébert Sylvie
École d'orthophonie et d'audiologie, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
BRAMS, International Laboratory for Brain, Music, and Sound Research, Université de Montréal and McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Psychophysiology. 2016 May;53(5):759-66. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12620. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
The gap-prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle (GPIAS) paradigm is the primary test used in animal research to identify gap detection thresholds and impairment. When a silent gap is presented shortly before a loud startling stimulus, the startle reflex is inhibited and the extent of inhibition is assumed to reflect detection. Here, we applied the same paradigm in humans. One hundred and fifty-seven normal-hearing participants were tested using one of five gap durations (5, 25, 50, 100, 200 ms) in one of the following two paradigms-gap-embedded in or gap-following-the continuous background noise. The duration-inhibition relationship was observable for both conditions but followed different patterns. In the gap-embedded paradigm, GPIAS increased significantly with gap duration up to 50 ms and then more slowly up to 200 ms (trend only). In contrast, in the gap-following paradigm, significant inhibition-different from 0--was observable only at gap durations from 50 to 200 ms. The finding that different patterns are found depending on gap position within the background noise is compatible with distinct mechanisms underlying each of the two paradigms.
听觉惊吓反应的间隔-预脉冲抑制(GPIAS)范式是动物研究中用于确定间隔检测阈值和损伤的主要测试方法。当在强烈的惊吓刺激之前不久呈现一个无声间隔时,惊吓反射会受到抑制,并且抑制程度被认为反映了检测能力。在此,我们在人类中应用了相同的范式。157名听力正常的参与者在以下两种范式之一中,使用五种间隔持续时间(5、25、50、100、200毫秒)中的一种进行测试——间隔嵌入或间隔跟随连续背景噪声。两种条件下均可观察到持续时间-抑制关系,但呈现不同模式。在间隔嵌入范式中,GPIAS随着间隔持续时间增加至50毫秒时显著增加,然后直至200毫秒时增加更为缓慢(仅为趋势)。相比之下,在间隔跟随范式中,仅在间隔持续时间为50至200毫秒时可观察到与0不同的显著抑制。根据背景噪声中间隔位置发现不同模式这一结果,与两种范式各自潜在的不同机制相符。