Suppr超能文献

比较咬合纸标记与T Scan III记录以评估正常及颌面创伤康复患者的咬合力。

Comparison of articulating paper markings and T Scan III recordings to evaluate occlusal force in normal and rehabilitated maxillofacial trauma patients.

作者信息

Majithia I P, Arora Vimal, Anil Kumar S, Saxena Vivek, Mittal Manish

机构信息

Commandant & Command Dental Advisor, Command Military Dental Centre (Central Command), Lucknow, India.

DGDS & Colonel Commandant, O/o DGDS, Adjutant General's Branch, IHQ, MoD, L Block, New Delhi 110001, India.

出版信息

Med J Armed Forces India. 2015 Dec;71(Suppl 2):S382-8. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2014.09.014. Epub 2014 Nov 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prosthodontic Rehabilitation of Treated Maxillofacial Trauma Cases by Evaluating Occlusal Force Distribution Using Computerized Occlusal Analysis.

METHOD

30 patients were selected for the study. 15 normal and 15 treated trauma patients were subjected to T Scan analysis and evaluated for the occlusal force distribution.

RESULTS

The results take into consideration the two parameters. Firstly the largest articulating paper mark (photographed) and secondly the T scan of the same patient. Comparison was made between the largest articulating paper mark and highest force tooth in the quadrant using T Scan. The matches and no matches were then tabulated for statistical analysis assessing the frequency of the matches to the no matches.

CONCLUSION

The ultimate advantage of a T Scan III analysis is that it can detect the amount of force as well as location of the highest intensity contacts of a single tooth which is very specific.

摘要

背景

通过计算机化咬合分析评估咬合力分布,对已治疗的颌面创伤病例进行口腔修复治疗。

方法

选择30名患者进行研究。15名正常患者和15名已治疗的创伤患者接受T扫描分析,并评估咬合力分布。

结果

结果考虑了两个参数。首先是最大的咬合纸印记(拍照),其次是同一患者的T扫描。使用T扫描在象限内最大的咬合纸印记和最高受力牙齿之间进行比较。然后将匹配和不匹配情况制成表格,进行统计分析,评估匹配与不匹配的频率。

结论

T扫描III分析的最终优势在于它能够检测单颗牙齿的受力大小以及最高强度接触的位置,这非常具有特异性。

相似文献

4
Clinical Decision Support Model to Predict Occlusal Force in Bruxism Patients.预测磨牙症患者咬合力的临床决策支持模型
Healthc Inform Res. 2017 Oct;23(4):255-261. doi: 10.4258/hir.2017.23.4.255. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
5
Comparative Study of Occlusal Contact Marking Indicators.咬合接触标记指标的比较研究。
Folia Med (Plovdiv). 2020 Mar 31;62(1):180-184. doi: 10.3897/folmed.62.e48018.

引用本文的文献

9
Differences between Subjective Balanced Occlusion and Measurements Reported With T-Scan III.主观平衡牙合与T-Scan III报告测量结果之间的差异。
Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2017 Aug 8;5(5):667-672. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2017.094. eCollection 2017 Aug 15.

本文引用的文献

4
Effects of load and indicator type upon occlusal contact markings.负荷与指示剂类型对咬合接触印记的影响。
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2008 Apr;85(1):18-22. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.30910.
10
Computerized occlusal analysis: a new technology.
Quintessence Int. 1987 Apr;18(4):287-92.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验