• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

遗忘字面意义:抑制在隐喻理解中的作用。

Forgetting the literal: The role of inhibition in metaphor comprehension.

作者信息

George Tim, Wiley Jennifer

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Chicago.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 Aug;42(8):1324-30. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000237. Epub 2016 Feb 4.

DOI:10.1037/xlm0000237
PMID:26844576
Abstract

In order for a person to comprehend metaphoric expressions, do metaphor-irrelevant aspects of literal information need to be inhibited? Previous research using sentence-verification paradigms has found that literal associates take longer to process after reading metaphorical sentences; however, it is problematic to infer inhibition from this research. Moreover, previous work has not distinguished between familiar and novel metaphor processing. To test more directly for when inhibition may be required during metaphor processing, we performed 3 experiments using a metaphor-induced lexical forgetting paradigm. Participants initially learned word pairs where the cues were potential metaphoric vehicles and the targets were literal associates (e.g., ). Then, participants read half the vehicles as part of metaphorical sentences, which they interpreted (). Subsequent forgetting of the literal associates was greater when vehicles had appeared in metaphorical sentences (Experiment 1) and was observed for both familiar and novel metaphors when participants were instructed to interpret the metaphors (Experiment 2) but was observed for only novel metaphors when participants were instructed to simply read the metaphors (Experiment 3). These results suggest that forgetting occurs as a result of inhibitory mechanisms that are engaged to alter activation of irrelevant literal information during metaphor processing, and that these mechanisms are most relevant for the processing demands associated with novel metaphors.

摘要

为了让一个人理解隐喻表达,字面信息中与隐喻无关的方面是否需要被抑制?以往使用句子验证范式的研究发现,在阅读隐喻句子后,字面联想词的处理时间更长;然而,从这项研究中推断抑制作用存在问题。此外,以往的研究没有区分熟悉的隐喻和新颖的隐喻处理。为了更直接地测试在隐喻处理过程中何时可能需要抑制,我们使用隐喻诱导的词汇遗忘范式进行了3项实验。参与者最初学习词对,其中线索是潜在的隐喻载体,目标是字面联想词(例如)。然后,参与者将一半的载体作为隐喻句子的一部分进行阅读,并对其进行解释()。当载体出现在隐喻句子中时,字面联想词随后的遗忘程度更大(实验1),当参与者被要求解释隐喻时,熟悉的隐喻和新颖的隐喻都出现了这种情况(实验2),但当参与者被要求简单阅读隐喻时,只在新颖的隐喻中出现了这种情况(实验3)。这些结果表明,遗忘是由于在隐喻处理过程中参与改变无关字面信息激活的抑制机制而发生的,并且这些机制与与新颖隐喻相关的处理需求最为相关。

相似文献

1
Forgetting the literal: The role of inhibition in metaphor comprehension.遗忘字面意义:抑制在隐喻理解中的作用。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 Aug;42(8):1324-30. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000237. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
2
Event-related potential evidence for the early activation of literal meaning during comprehension of conventional lexical metaphors.事件相关电位证据表明,在理解常规词汇隐喻时,字面意义会被早期激活。
Neuropsychologia. 2012 Jul;50(8):1730-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.03.027. Epub 2012 Apr 25.
3
When is literal meaning inhibited? Evidence from nonsense in the metaphor-induced lexical forgetting paradigm.字面意义何时会受到抑制?来自隐喻诱导词汇遗忘范式中的无意义内容的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 May;45(5):869-880. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000621. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
4
Neural correlates of metaphor processing: the roles of figurativeness, familiarity and difficulty.隐喻加工的神经关联:形象性、熟悉度和难度的作用。
Brain Cogn. 2009 Dec;71(3):375-86. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.06.001. Epub 2009 Jul 7.
5
Electrophysiological insights into the processing of nominal metaphors.论名词隐喻处理的电生理学研究进展
Neuropsychologia. 2010 Jun;48(7):1965-84. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.03.017. Epub 2010 Mar 20.
6
An fMRI study of processing novel metaphoric sentences.一项关于处理新颖隐喻句子的功能磁共振成像研究。
Laterality. 2009 Jan;14(1):30-54. doi: 10.1080/13576500802049433. Epub 2008 May 16.
7
Comprehending conventional and novel metaphors: an ERP study.理解传统隐喻与新颖隐喻:一项事件相关电位研究。
Brain Res. 2009 Aug 11;1284:145-55. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.05.088. Epub 2009 Jun 6.
8
Neural mechanisms involved in the comprehension of metaphoric and literal sentences: an fMRI study.隐喻句和直白句理解中涉及的神经机制:一项功能磁共振成像研究。
Brain Res. 2007 Aug 29;1166:92-102. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.06.040. Epub 2007 Jul 6.
9
Musical metaphors: evidence for a spatial grounding of non-literal sentences describing auditory events.音乐隐喻:描述听觉事件的非字面句子存在空间基础的证据。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2015 Mar;156:126-35. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.09.006. Epub 2014 Oct 18.
10
Understanding metaphors: Is the right hemisphere uniquely involved?理解隐喻:右半球是否具有独特作用?
Brain Lang. 2007 Feb;100(2):188-207. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2005.10.010. Epub 2005 Dec 1.

引用本文的文献

1
The cognitive aspect of formal thought disorder and its relationship with global social functioning and the quality of life in schizophrenia.精神分裂症患者的定式思维障碍的认知方面及其与整体社会功能和生活质量的关系。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2021 Aug;56(8):1399-1410. doi: 10.1007/s00127-021-02024-w. Epub 2021 Jan 17.
2
Inhibitory control during selective retrieval may hinder subsequent analogical thinking.在选择性检索期间进行抑制控制可能会阻碍随后的类比思维。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 12;14(2):e0211881. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211881. eCollection 2019.