Suppr超能文献

默读和朗读中的副中央凹加工:阅读模式影响汉语中语音和语义信息的相对权重。

Parafoveal processing in silent and oral reading: Reading mode influences the relative weighting of phonological and semantic information in Chinese.

作者信息

Pan Jinger, Laubrock Jochen, Yan Ming

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 Aug;42(8):1257-73. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000242. Epub 2016 Feb 4.

Abstract

We examined how reading mode (i.e., silent vs. oral reading) influences parafoveal semantic and phonological processing during the reading of Chinese sentences, using the gaze-contingent boundary paradigm. In silent reading, we found in 2 experiments that reading times on target words were shortened with semantic previews in early and late processing, whereas phonological preview effects mainly occurred in gaze duration or second-pass reading. In contrast, results showed that phonological preview information is obtained early on in oral reading. Strikingly, in oral reading, we observed a semantic preview cost on the target word in Experiment 1 and a decrease in the effect size of preview benefit from first- to second-pass measures in Experiment 2, which we hypothesize to result from increased preview duration. Taken together, our results indicate that parafoveal semantic information can be obtained irrespective of reading mode, whereas readers more efficiently process parafoveal phonological information in oral reading. We discuss implications for notions of information processing priority and saccade generation during silent and oral reading. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

我们使用注视点边界范式,研究了阅读模式(即默读与朗读)如何影响中文句子阅读过程中的副中央凹语义和语音加工。在默读中,我们在两个实验中发现,在早期和晚期加工中,目标词的阅读时间会随着语义预视而缩短,而语音预视效应主要出现在注视持续时间或二次阅读中。相比之下,结果表明语音预视信息在朗读中更早获得。令人惊讶的是,在朗读中,我们在实验1中观察到目标词存在语义预视代价,在实验2中从首次阅读到二次阅读的预视效益效应大小有所下降,我们推测这是由于预视持续时间增加所致。综合来看,我们的结果表明,无论阅读模式如何,都可以获得副中央凹语义信息,而读者在朗读中能更有效地加工副中央凹语音信息。我们讨论了这些结果对默读和朗读过程中信息加工优先级和眼跳产生概念的影响。(《心理学文摘数据库记录》 )

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验