• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头孢曲松与头孢噻肟治疗严重胸部感染的比较。

Comparison of ceftriaxone with cefotaxime in serious chest infections.

作者信息

Reeves J H, Russell G M, Cade J F, McDonald M

机构信息

Intensive Care Unit, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Chest. 1989 Dec;96(6):1292-7. doi: 10.1378/chest.96.6.1292.

DOI:10.1378/chest.96.6.1292
PMID:2684552
Abstract

Ceftriaxone is a new, third-generation cephalosporin that, because of its long half-life, offers potential advantages of cost and convenience over similar agents such as cefotaxime. We compared the two drugs in a prospective, randomized study of the treatment of chest infections in seriously ill patients. Fifty-one patients (90 percent of whom were mechanically ventilated) received either ceftriaxone, 2g IV once daily, or cefotaxime, 2 g IV thrice daily, for five days. The two groups of patients appeared demographically comparable. Ceftriaxone in a single daily dose of 2 g once daily may not be satisfactory for the treatment of serious chest infections.

摘要

头孢曲松是一种新型的第三代头孢菌素,由于其半衰期长,与头孢噻肟等同类药物相比,在成本和便利性方面具有潜在优势。我们在一项针对重症患者胸部感染治疗的前瞻性随机研究中对这两种药物进行了比较。51例患者(其中90%接受机械通气)接受了为期5天的治疗,一组患者每日静脉注射一次2g头孢曲松,另一组患者每日静脉注射三次2g头孢噻肟。两组患者在人口统计学上似乎具有可比性。每日单次剂量2g的头孢曲松可能不足以有效治疗严重的胸部感染。

相似文献

1
Comparison of ceftriaxone with cefotaxime in serious chest infections.头孢曲松与头孢噻肟治疗严重胸部感染的比较。
Chest. 1989 Dec;96(6):1292-7. doi: 10.1378/chest.96.6.1292.
2
Cefotaxime twice daily versus ceftriaxone once daily. A randomized controlled study in patients with serious infections.头孢噻肟每日两次与头孢曲松每日一次的对比:一项针对严重感染患者的随机对照研究
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1995 May-Jun;22(1-2):155-7. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(95)00080-t.
3
Ceftriaxone compared with cefotaxime for serious bacterial infections.头孢曲松与头孢噻肟治疗严重细菌感染的比较。
J Infect Dis. 1989 Sep;160(3):442-7. doi: 10.1093/infdis/160.3.442.
4
Once-daily therapy with ceftriaxone compared with daily multiple-dose therapy with cefotaxime for serious bacterial infections: a randomized, double-blind study.
J Infect Dis. 1989 Sep;160(3):433-41. doi: 10.1093/infdis/160.3.433.
5
Comparison of the efficacy and adverse effect profile of cefotaxime and ceftriaxone in ICU patients with susceptible infections.头孢噻肟与头孢曲松对重症监护病房(ICU)易感感染患者的疗效及不良反应比较
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1992 Jan;15(1):89-97. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(92)90062-x.
6
Cefotaxime. A pharmacoeconomic review of its use in the treatment of infections.头孢噻肟。对其用于治疗感染的药物经济学综述。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1998 Jan;13(1 Pt 1):91-106. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199813010-00009.
7
Ceftriaxone versus cefotaxime in the treatment of septicemia in adults.头孢曲松与头孢噻肟治疗成人败血症的疗效比较
Chemotherapy. 1989;35 Suppl 2:5-9. doi: 10.1159/000238731.
8
Therapy of lower respiratory tract infections: a comparison of ceftriaxone and cefotaxime.下呼吸道感染的治疗:头孢曲松与头孢噻肟的比较
Chemotherapy. 1989;35 Suppl 2:33-40. doi: 10.1159/000238737.
9
Treatment of lower respiratory tract infections with ceftriaxone and cefotaxime. A comparative study.头孢曲松与头孢噻肟治疗下呼吸道感染的比较研究
Respiration. 1986;49(3):222-30. doi: 10.1159/000194882.
10
[Cost-effectiveness comparative study of ceftriaxone verus cefotaxime in the treatment of complicated urinary infections].头孢曲松与头孢噻肟治疗复杂性泌尿系统感染的成本效益比较研究
Actas Urol Esp. 1997 Jul-Aug;21(7):668-74.

引用本文的文献

1
Cefotaxime Versus Ceftriaxone: A Comprehensive Comparative Review.头孢噻肟与头孢曲松:全面比较综述
Cureus. 2024 Sep 11;16(9):e69146. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69146. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Management of Adults With Hospital-acquired and Ventilator-associated Pneumonia: 2016 Clinical Practice Guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the American Thoracic Society.成人医院获得性肺炎和呼吸机相关性肺炎的管理:美国感染病学会和美国胸科学会2016年临床实践指南
Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Sep 1;63(5):e61-e111. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw353. Epub 2016 Jul 14.
3
Antimicrobial activity of ceftriaxone compared with cefotaxime in the presence of serum albumin.
在血清白蛋白存在的情况下头孢曲松与头孢噻肟的抗菌活性比较。
Can J Infect Dis. 1995 Jan;6(1):21-7. doi: 10.1155/1995/617610.
4
Clinical practice guidelines for hospital-acquired pneumonia and ventilator-associated pneumonia in adults.成人医院获得性肺炎和呼吸机相关性肺炎临床实践指南。
Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2008 Jan;19(1):19-53. doi: 10.1155/2008/593289.
5
[Parenteral cephalosporins for the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections].
Infection. 1993;21 Suppl 1:S28-34. doi: 10.1007/BF01710341.
6
The antimicrobial activity of cefotaxime: comparative multinational hospital isolate surveys covering 15 years.头孢噻肟的抗菌活性:涵盖15年的多国医院分离株比较调查
Infection. 1994;22 Suppl 3:S152-60. doi: 10.1007/BF01782700.
7
Oral versus intravenous antibiotics for community acquired lower respiratory tract infection in a general hospital: open, randomised controlled trial.综合医院中口服抗生素与静脉用抗生素治疗社区获得性下呼吸道感染的疗效比较:开放性随机对照试验
BMJ. 1995 May 27;310(6991):1360-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6991.1360.
8
Cefotaxime. An update of its pharmacology and therapeutic use.头孢噻肟。其药理学与治疗应用的最新进展。
Drugs. 1990 Oct;40(4):608-51. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199040040-00008.
9
Nosocomial pneumonia in children.
Infection. 1991 Mar-Apr;19(2):64-72. doi: 10.1007/BF01645570.
10
Nosocomial pneumonia: comparative multicentre trial between monotherapy with cefotaxime and treatment with antibiotic combinations.医院获得性肺炎:头孢噻肟单药治疗与抗生素联合治疗的多中心对照试验
Infection. 1991;19 Suppl 6:S320-5. doi: 10.1007/BF01715772.