• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[用于体内药物走私的超声检查]

[Sonography for intracorporeal drug smuggling].

作者信息

Sauer W, Freislederer A, Graw M, Schmidt V

机构信息

Institut für Gerichtliche Medizin, Universität Tübingen.

出版信息

Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1989 Dec 1;114(48):1865-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1066840.

DOI:10.1055/s-2008-1066840
PMID:2684586
Abstract

To evaluate the place of ultrasonography in the detection of intracorporeal drug packets (body-packs) ten volunteers were examined by ultrasound after having swallowed four body-packs each. Diagnostic criteria had first been established by ultrasound imaging of body-packs in a water bath. The body-packs contained finger-stalls, 1.5-1.8 cm in diameter, filled with hard-pressed glucose. The criterion for identification in the water-bath was shown to be a sickle-shaped echo with a dorsal echo deficit. This sign identified 23 of the 40 body-packs in eight of the ten subjects. Within the first three hours of ingestion 22 body-packs were demonstrated in eight of the subjects; after 17 hours nine body-packs were identified in the stomach of four subjects. In only one subject was it possible to identify (two) body-packs in the region of the small-large intestine. In practice, intracorporeal drug smugglers will almost always have the body-packs in the stomach at the time of likely examination. Extensive ultrasound screening of suspected smugglers is, therefore, recommended.

摘要

为评估超声检查在检测体内毒品包裹(人体携带包)中的作用,让10名志愿者每人吞下4个人体携带包后进行超声检查。诊断标准首先通过在水浴中对人体携带包进行超声成像来确定。人体携带包内装有用手指套包裹的直径为1.5 - 1.8厘米的压缩葡萄糖。在水浴中识别的标准是出现镰刀状回声且背侧回声缺失。该征象在10名受试者中的8名身上识别出了40个包裹中的23个。摄入后的前3小时内,8名受试者身上显示出22个包裹;17小时后,在4名受试者的胃中识别出9个包裹。仅在1名受试者的大小肠区域识别出(2个)包裹。实际上,体内毒品走私者在可能接受检查时几乎总是会将人体携带包置于胃中。因此,建议对可疑走私者进行广泛的超声筛查。

相似文献

1
[Sonography for intracorporeal drug smuggling].[用于体内药物走私的超声检查]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1989 Dec 1;114(48):1865-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1066840.
2
[Gastric and intestinal appearances by abdominal ultrasound. The sign of brownian motion (author's transl)].[腹部超声检查所见的胃和肠道。布朗运动征(作者译)]
J Radiol. 1979 Oct;60(10):579-90.
3
Drug smuggling by body packers. Detection and removal of internally concealed drugs.人体携毒者的毒品走私。体内藏匿毒品的检测与清除。
Med J Aust. 1993;159(11-12):750-4.
4
[Body packing: the value of modern imaging procedures in the detection of intracorporeal transport media].人体藏毒:现代成像程序在检测体内运输介质中的价值
Arch Kriminol. 1988 Nov-Dec;182(5-6):143-53.
5
[Body-packing: detection of incorporated drug packets using ultrasound technics].[人体藏毒:使用超声技术检测体内藏匿的毒品包裹]
Beitr Gerichtl Med. 1989;47:187-91.
6
[Sonographic detectability of narcotic drug containers in the gastrointestinal tract. Experimental research in the dog].[胃肠道中麻醉药品容器的超声可检测性。犬类实验研究]
Rofo. 1987 May;146(5):544-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1048536.
7
Conservative management of cocaine-packet ingestion: experience in Milan, the main Italian smuggling center of South American cocaine.可卡因包裹摄入的保守治疗:在意大利主要的南美可卡因走私中心米兰的经验。
Panminerva Med. 1996 Jun;38(2):111-6.
8
Roadside detection of impairment under the influence of ketamine--evaluation of ketamine impairment symptoms with reference to its concentration in oral fluid and urine.氯胺酮影响下道路上的损伤检测——参照口腔液和尿液中氯胺酮浓度评估氯胺酮损伤症状
Forensic Sci Int. 2007 Jul 20;170(1):51-8. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.09.001. Epub 2006 Oct 13.
9
Heat transfer to deep tissue: the effect of body fat and heating modality.热量向深层组织的传递:身体脂肪和加热方式的影响。
J Med Eng Technol. 2009;33(5):337-48. doi: 10.1080/03091900802069547.
10
Anatomical aspects in ultrasonic endoscopy for the stomach.
Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1984;94:34-42.

引用本文的文献

1
[Emergent surgery for body packing - what happens to the drugs?].[体内藏毒者的急诊手术——毒品会怎样?]
Chirurg. 2004 Apr;75(4):436-41. doi: 10.1007/s00104-004-0841-9.