Minatto Giseli, Barbosa Filho Valter Cordeiro, Berria Juliane, Petroski Edio Luiz
Research Centre for Kinanthropometry and Human Performance, Sports Centre, Campus Universitário, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Trindade, Caixa Postal 476, Florianópolis, SC, CEP 88040-900, Brazil.
Research Centre for Physical Activity and Health, Sports Centre, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.
Sports Med. 2016 Sep;46(9):1273-92. doi: 10.1007/s40279-016-0480-6.
School-based intervention can contribute to the promotion of cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) in adolescents. However, it is neces sary to systematize how intervention strategies and the methodological characteristics of studies influence the effects of CRF interventions.
A meta-analysis review of school-based intervention studies aimed at increasing CRF in adolescents (10-19 years of age) was conducted.
A search for studies was conducted using the Medline, Web of Science, LILACS, PsycINFO, Embase, Scopus, SPORTDiscus and Cochrane databases and the reference lists of the selected studies. The peer selection process included consideration of school-based randomized or non-randomized controlled trials with a duration ≥12 weeks published in English, Portuguese or Spanish, and with some CRF measures. The methodological quality of the studies was also assessed. The standardized mean differences (SMDs) and 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CIs) were calculated as an effect measure.
Forty publications of 30 interventions were included in the review, and 25 of these were meta-analysed. The effects of CRF interventions were moderate and significant (SMD = 0.68, 95 % CI 0.45-0.90), with high heterogeneity (I (2) = 97 %). The effect size varied significantly according to the age group, sample size, intervention environment, strategies in experimental groups, CRF priority in the study, CRF test and indicator, session length, weekly frequency, intervention duration and presentation of results by sex.
Interventions in the school environment seem to have a positive effect on CRF among adolescents, but there is high heterogeneity between studies. Some intervention characteristics can explain better effects on CRF (e.g. exercise sessions in addition to physical education classes; primary focus on this outcome; combination of aerobic and resistance exercises; classes lasting ≥60 min; frequency of three times weekly; and intensity control).
基于学校的干预有助于促进青少年的心肺适能(CRF)。然而,有必要系统地梳理干预策略和研究的方法学特征如何影响CRF干预的效果。
对旨在提高青少年(10 - 19岁)CRF的基于学校的干预研究进行荟萃分析综述。
使用Medline、科学网、LILACS、PsycINFO、Embase、Scopus、SPORTDiscus和Cochrane数据库以及所选研究的参考文献列表进行研究检索。同行筛选过程包括考虑以英文、葡萄牙文或西班牙文发表的、持续时间≥12周的基于学校的随机或非随机对照试验,且有一些CRF测量指标。还评估了研究的方法学质量。计算标准化平均差(SMD)和95%置信区间(95%CI)作为效应量。
该综述纳入了30项干预措施的40篇出版物,其中25项进行了荟萃分析。CRF干预的效果中等且显著(SMD = 0.68,95%CI 0.45 - 0.90),异质性较高(I² = 97%)。效应大小根据年龄组、样本量、干预环境、实验组策略、研究中的CRF优先级、CRF测试和指标、课程时长、每周频率、干预持续时间以及按性别呈现结果而有显著差异。
学校环境中的干预似乎对青少年的CRF有积极影响,但研究之间存在高度异质性。一些干预特征可以解释对CRF有更好的效果(例如,除体育课之外的锻炼课程;主要关注这一结果;有氧运动和抗阻运动相结合;课程持续时间≥60分钟;每周三次的频率;以及强度控制)。