Shim Sung Ryul, Kim Jae Heon, Chang In Ho, Shin In Soo, Hwang Sung Dong, Kim Khae Hwan, Yoon Sang Jin, Song Yun Seob
Institute for Clinical Molecular Biology Research, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Urology, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Yonsei Med J. 2016 Mar;57(2):407-18. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2016.57.2.407.
Tamsulosin 0.2 mg is used widely in Asian people, but the low dose has been studied less than tamsulosin 0.4 mg or other alpha blockers of standard dose. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of tamsulosin 0.2 mg by a meta-analysis and meta-regression.
We conducted a meta-analysis of efficacy of tamsulosin 0.2 mg using International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), maximal urinary flow rate (Qmax), post-voided residual volume (PVR), and quality of life (QoL). Safety was analyzed using adverse events. Relevant studies were searched using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane library from January 1980 to June 2013.
Ten studies were included with a total sample size of 1418 subjects [722 tamsulosin 0.2 mg group and 696 other alpha-blockers (terazosin, doxazosin, naftopidil, silodosin) group]. Study duration ranged from 4 to 24 weeks. The pooled overall standardized mean differences (SMD) in the mean change of IPSS from baseline for the tamsulosin group versus the control group was 0.02 [95% confidence interval (CI); -0.20, 0.25]. The pooled overall SMD in the mean change of QoL from baseline for the tamsulosin group versus the control group was 0.16 (95% CI; -0.16, 0.48). The regression analysis with the continuous variables (number of patients, study duration) revealed no significance in all outcomes as IPSS, QoL, and Qmax.
This study clarifies that tamsulosin 0.2 mg has similar efficacy and fewer adverse events compared with other alpha-blockers as an initial treatment strategy for men with lower urinary tract symptoms.
坦索罗辛0.2毫克在亚洲人群中广泛使用,但与坦索罗辛0.4毫克或其他标准剂量的α受体阻滞剂相比,低剂量的研究较少。本研究通过荟萃分析和荟萃回归研究了坦索罗辛0.2毫克的疗效和安全性。
我们使用国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)、最大尿流率(Qmax)、排尿后残余尿量(PVR)和生活质量(QoL)对坦索罗辛0.2毫克的疗效进行了荟萃分析。使用不良事件分析安全性。从1980年1月至2013年6月,通过MEDLINE、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆检索相关研究。
纳入10项研究,总样本量为1418名受试者[坦索罗辛0.2毫克组722名,其他α受体阻滞剂(特拉唑嗪、多沙唑嗪、萘哌地尔、西洛多辛)组696名]。研究持续时间为4至24周。坦索罗辛组与对照组相比,IPSS从基线的平均变化的合并总体标准化均值差(SMD)为0.02[95%置信区间(CI);-0.20,0.25]。坦索罗辛组与对照组相比,QoL从基线的平均变化的合并总体SMD为0.16(95%CI;-0.16,0.48)。对连续变量(患者数量、研究持续时间)的回归分析显示,在所有结局(如IPSS、QoL和Qmax)中均无显著性。
本研究表明,作为治疗下尿路症状男性的初始治疗策略,坦索罗辛0.2毫克与其他α受体阻滞剂相比具有相似的疗效且不良事件较少。