• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双语儿童和患有特定语言障碍的单语儿童的连接加工:不同的表现特征。

Connective processing by bilingual children and monolinguals with specific language impairment: distinct profiles.

作者信息

Mak Willem M, Tribushinina Elena, Lomako Julia, Gagarina Natalia, Abrosova Ekaterina, Sanders Ted

机构信息

Utrecht University.

ZAS Berlin.

出版信息

J Child Lang. 2017 Mar;44(2):329-345. doi: 10.1017/S0305000915000860. Epub 2016 Feb 5.

DOI:10.1017/S0305000915000860
PMID:26847820
Abstract

Production studies show that both Russian-speaking children with specific language impairment (SLI) and bilingual children for whom Russian is a non-dominant language have difficulty distinguishing between the near-synonymous connectives i 'and' and a 'and/but'. I is a preferred connective when reference is maintained, whereas a is normally used for reference shift. We report an eye-tracking experiment comparing connective processing by Russian-speaking monolinguals with typical language development (TLD) with that of Russian-Dutch bilinguals and Russian-speaking monolinguals with SLI (age 5-6). The results demonstrate that the processing profiles of monolinguals with TLD and bilinguals are similar: both groups use connective semantics immediately for predicting further discourse. In contrast, children with SLI do not show sensitivity to these semantic differences. Despite similar production profiles, bilinguals and monolinguals with SLI are clearly different in connective processing. We discuss the implications of these results for the possible causes of the errors in the two populations.

摘要

生产研究表明,患有特定语言障碍(SLI)的讲俄语儿童以及以俄语为非主导语言的双语儿童在区分近义连接词и(“和”)和а(“和/但”)时都有困难。当保持所指时,и是首选连接词,而а通常用于所指转移。我们报告了一项眼动追踪实验,比较了具有典型语言发展(TLD)的讲俄语单语者与俄语-荷兰语双语者以及患有SLI的讲俄语单语者(5至6岁)对连接词的处理情况。结果表明,具有TLD的单语者和双语者的处理模式相似:两组都立即使用连接词语义来预测后续话语。相比之下,患有SLI的儿童对这些语义差异不敏感。尽管生产模式相似,但双语者和患有SLI的单语者在连接词处理上明显不同。我们讨论了这些结果对这两类人群中错误可能原因的影响。

相似文献

1
Connective processing by bilingual children and monolinguals with specific language impairment: distinct profiles.双语儿童和患有特定语言障碍的单语儿童的连接加工:不同的表现特征。
J Child Lang. 2017 Mar;44(2):329-345. doi: 10.1017/S0305000915000860. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
2
Referential Cohesion in the Narratives of Bilingual and Monolingual Children With Typically Developing Language and With Specific Language Impairment.双语和单语儿童语言正常与特定语言障碍叙事中的指代衔接。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 Jan 30;62(1):123-142. doi: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-18-0054.
3
Specific language impairment in language-minority children from low-income families.低收入家庭中语言少数群体儿童的特定语言障碍。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2014 Nov;49(6):736-47. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12107. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
4
Diagnostic accuracy of repetition tasks for the identification of specific language impairment (SLI) in bilingual children: evidence from Russian and Hebrew.重复任务对双语儿童特定语言障碍(SLI)识别的诊断准确性:来自俄语和希伯来语的证据。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2016 Nov;51(6):715-731. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12242. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
5
The use of subject-verb agreement and verb argument structure in monolingual and bilingual children with specific language impairment.特定语言障碍的单语和双语儿童对主谓一致和动词论元结构的运用。
Clin Linguist Phon. 2012 Apr;26(4):357-79. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2011.637658.
6
Between L2 and SLI: inflections and prepositions in the Hebrew of bilingual children with TLD and monolingual children with SLI.在L2和SLI之间:患有语言发展迟缓的双语儿童及患有特定语言障碍的单语儿童希伯来语中的词尾变化和介词
J Child Lang. 2014 Jan;41(1):3-33. doi: 10.1017/S0305000912000487. Epub 2012 Nov 26.
7
Discriminant accuracy of a semantics measure with Latino English-speaking, Spanish-speaking, and English-Spanish bilingual children.一种语义测量方法对说拉丁裔英语、说西班牙语以及英-西双语儿童的判别准确性。
J Commun Disord. 2015 Jan-Feb;53:30-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2014.11.001. Epub 2014 Dec 12.
8
Assessment of second language proficiency in bilingual children with specific language impairment: a clinical perspective.双语儿童特定语言障碍中第二语言熟练程度的评估:临床视角。
Res Dev Disabil. 2011 Sep-Oct;32(5):1798-807. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.03.010. Epub 2011 May 8.
9
Verb morphology as clinical marker of specific language impairment: evidence from first and second language learners.动词形态作为特定语言损伤的临床标志物:来自第一语言和第二语言学习者的证据。
Res Dev Disabil. 2011 May-Jun;32(3):1186-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.01.001. Epub 2011 Feb 18.
10
Linguistic markers of specific language impairment in bilingual children: the case of verb morphology.双语儿童特定语言障碍的语言标记:动词形态的案例
Clin Linguist Phon. 2014 Sep;28(9):709-21. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2014.886726. Epub 2014 Mar 3.