• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

挠痒痒算折磨吗?评估Web 2.0视频中懒猴(蜂猴属)的福利状况。

Is Tickling Torture? Assessing Welfare towards Slow Lorises (Nycticebus spp.) within Web 2.0 Videos.

作者信息

Nekaris K Anne I, Musing Louisa, Vazquez Asier Gil, Donati Giuseppe

机构信息

Nocturnal Primate Research Group, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Folia Primatol (Basel). 2015;86(6):534-51. doi: 10.1159/000444231. Epub 2016 Feb 6.

DOI:10.1159/000444231
PMID:26848764
Abstract

Videos, memes and images of pet slow lorises have become increasingly popular on the Internet. Although some video sites allow viewers to tag material as 'animal cruelty', no site has yet acknowledged the presence of cruelty in slow loris videos. We examined 100 online videos to assess whether they violated the 'five freedoms' of animal welfare and whether presence or absence of these conditions contributed to the number of thumbs up and views received by the videos. We found that all 100 videos showed at least 1 condition known as negative for lorises, indicating absence of the necessary freedom; 4% showed only 1 condition, but in nearly one third (31.3%) all 5 chosen criteria were present, including human contact (57%), daylight (87%), signs of stress/ill health (53%), unnatural environment (91%) and isolation from conspecifics (77%). The public were more likely to like videos where a slow loris was kept in the light or displayed signs of stress. Recent work on primates has shown that imagery of primates in a human context can cause viewers to perceive them as less threatened. Prevalence of a positive public opinion of such videos is a real threat towards awareness of the conservation crisis faced by slow lorises.

摘要

懒猴宠物的视频、表情包和图片在互联网上越来越受欢迎。尽管一些视频网站允许观众将相关内容标记为“虐待动物”,但尚无网站承认懒猴视频中存在虐待行为。我们检查了100个在线视频,以评估它们是否违反了动物福利的“五项自由”,以及这些情况的有无是否影响了视频获得的点赞数和观看量。我们发现,所有100个视频都至少显示出一种对懒猴不利的情况,表明缺乏必要的自由;4%的视频仅显示一种情况,但近三分之一(31.3%)的视频出现了所有五项选定标准,包括与人类接触(57%)、在日光下(87%)、有压力/健康不佳的迹象(53%)、非自然环境(91%)以及与同类隔离(77%)。公众更有可能喜欢懒猴处于光照下或表现出压力迹象的视频。最近关于灵长类动物的研究表明,灵长类动物在人类环境中的影像会让观众觉得它们受到的威胁较小。公众对这类视频的积极看法普遍存在,这对懒猴面临的保护危机的认知构成了真正的威胁。

相似文献

1
Is Tickling Torture? Assessing Welfare towards Slow Lorises (Nycticebus spp.) within Web 2.0 Videos.挠痒痒算折磨吗?评估Web 2.0视频中懒猴(蜂猴属)的福利状况。
Folia Primatol (Basel). 2015;86(6):534-51. doi: 10.1159/000444231. Epub 2016 Feb 6.
2
Tickled to death: analysing public perceptions of 'cute' videos of threatened species (slow lorises - Nycticebus spp.) on Web 2.0 sites.被逗死了:分析公众对 Web 2.0 网站上受威胁物种(懒猴属)“可爱”视频的看法。
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 24;8(7):e69215. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069215. Print 2013.
3
Abnormal Repetitive Behaviours of Confiscated Slow Loris (Nycticebus spp.) in Thailand.泰国没收的懒猴(蜂猴属)的异常重复行为
Folia Primatol (Basel). 2018;89(3-4):216-223. doi: 10.1159/000487432. Epub 2018 May 7.
4
Mother-infant interactions in slow lorises (Nycticebus bengalensis) and pygmy lorises (Nycticebus pygmaeus).懒猴(孟加拉懒猴)和蜂猴(倭蜂猴)的母婴互动。
Folia Primatol (Basel). 2003 Sep-Dec;74(5-6):259-71. doi: 10.1159/000073313.
5
Exudativory in the Asian loris, Nycticebus: Evolutionary divergence in the toothcomb and M3.懒猴属(蜂猴属)亚洲懒猴的食渗出物习性:梳齿和M3的进化差异
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2015 Dec;158(4):663-72. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.22829. Epub 2015 Aug 19.
6
Welfare impacts of the illegal wildlife trade in a cohort of confiscated greater slow lorises, Nycticebus coucang.一群没收的懒猴(蜂猴属)非法野生动物贸易的福利影响
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2018 Jul-Sep;21(3):224-238. doi: 10.1080/10888705.2017.1393338. Epub 2017 Nov 29.
7
Social relationships among captive male pygmy slow lorises (Nycticebus pygmaeus): Is forming male same-sex pairs a feasible management strategy?圈养雄性侏果蝠(Nycticebus pygmaeus)之间的社会关系:形成雄性同性对是否是一种可行的管理策略?
Am J Primatol. 2021 Feb;83(2):e23233. doi: 10.1002/ajp.23233. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
8
Reducing stress and stereotypic behaviors in captive female pygmy slow lorises (Nycticebus pygmeaus).减少圈养雌性侏果蝠(Nycticebus pygmeaus)的压力和刻板行为。
Am J Primatol. 2023 Jul;85(7):e23495. doi: 10.1002/ajp.23495. Epub 2023 May 2.
9
Exploring cultural drivers for wildlife trade via an ethnoprimatological approach: a case study of slender and slow lorises (Loris and Nycticebus) in South and Southeast Asia.通过民族生物学方法探究野生物贸易的文化驱动因素:以南亚热带和东南亚的眼镜猴(懒猴属和跗猴属)为例。
Am J Primatol. 2010 Sep;72(10):877-86. doi: 10.1002/ajp.20842.
10
Obligate exudativory characterizes the diet of the pygmy slow loris Nycticebus pygmaeus.苛性渗出液的特征表现在侏长尾猴 Nycticebus pygmaeus 的饮食中。
Am J Primatol. 2013 Oct;75(10):1054-61. doi: 10.1002/ajp.22171. Epub 2013 Jun 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Behind the Trend: An Examination of Primate Content on TikTok.趋势背后:TikTok上灵长类动物内容的审视
Am J Primatol. 2025 Aug;87(8):e70063. doi: 10.1002/ajp.70063.
2
Elephant 'selfies': Evaluating the effectiveness of Instagram's warning of the potential negative impacts of photo opportunities with wild animals.大象自拍:评估 Instagram 对与野生动物拍照的潜在负面影响发出警告的效果。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 6;18(4):e0283858. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283858. eCollection 2023.
3
An Evaluation of Ethograms Measuring Distinct Features of Enrichment Use by Captive Chimpanzees ().
圈养黑猩猩对丰富环境利用的不同特征测量的行为图谱评估()。 (注:括号部分原文缺失具体内容)
Animals (Basel). 2022 Aug 10;12(16):2029. doi: 10.3390/ani12162029.
4
Pet Macaques in Vietnam: An NGO's Perspective.越南的宠物猕猴:一个非政府组织的视角。
Animals (Basel). 2020 Dec 30;11(1):60. doi: 10.3390/ani11010060.
5
Investigating the welfare and conservation implications of alligator wrestling for American Alligators (Alligator mississippiensis).调查鳄鱼摔跤对美洲鳄(密西西比鳄)的福利和保护影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 13;15(11):e0242106. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242106. eCollection 2020.
6
Social Media Contexts Moderate Perceptions of Animals.社交媒体环境调节对动物的认知。
Animals (Basel). 2020 May 14;10(5):845. doi: 10.3390/ani10050845.
7
A viral video and pet lemurs on Twitter.一段病毒视频和推特上的宠物狐猴。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 9;14(1):e0208577. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208577. eCollection 2019.