短跑运动员和中长跑运动员最大强度及超最大强度跑步运动的摄氧量动力学
The V[Combining Dot Above]O2 Kinetics of Maximal and Supramaximal Running Exercises in Sprinters and Middle-Distance Runners.
作者信息
do Nascimento Salvador Paulo C, Dal Pupo Juliano, De Lucas Ricardo D, de Aguiar Rafael A, Arins Francimara B, Guglielmo Luiz G A
机构信息
1Physical Effort Laboratory, Sports Center, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, Brazil; and 2Human Performance Research Laboratory, Center for Health and Sport Science, Santa Catarina State University, Florianopolis, Brazil.
出版信息
J Strength Cond Res. 2016 Oct;30(10):2857-63. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001366.
do Nascimento Salvador, PC, Dal Pupo, J, De Lucas, RD, de Aguiar, RA, Arins, FB, and Guglielmo, LGA. The V[Combining Dot Above]O2 kinetics of maximal and supramaximal running exercises in sprinters and middle-distance runners. J Strength Cond Res 30(10): 2857-2863, 2016-The aim of this study was to compare the V[Combining Dot Above]O2 kinetics parameters during maximal and supramaximal running exercises in sprinters (SPR) and middle-distance runners (MDR). Twelve SPR (age 20.6 ± 3.4 years; and body mass 74.9 ± 6.2 kg) and 10 MDR (age 17.6 ± 1.4 years; and body mass 70.1 ± 11.8 kg) performed, on different days, a maximal incremental running test for determination of the velocity at maximum oxygen uptake (vV[Combining Dot Above]O2max) and 2 constant-speed tests for analysis of V[Combining Dot Above]O2 kinetics at 100 and 120% of vV[Combining Dot Above]O2max. The MDR presented significantly higher values for the critical speed (18.0 ± 1.0 vs. 14.2 ± 1.0 km·h), vV[Combining Dot Above]O2max (19.4 ± 0.7 vs. 17.2 ± 0.8 km·h), and time to exhaustion at 100% (437 ± 53 vs. 366 ± 49 seconds) than the SPR (p ≤ 0.05). However, the SPR demonstrated greater values for the anaerobic distance capacity (281.3 ± 66.1 vs. 208.0 ± 43.4 m). Although the mean response time and the time to attain the V[Combining Dot Above]O2max of the V[Combining Dot Above]O2 kinetics was higher in the maximal than supramaximal running speed (p ≤ 0.05), no difference was found in these parameters as well for V[Combining Dot Above]O2 slow component (p > 0.05) between the groups. This study showed that different aerobic and anaerobic characteristics in MDR and SPR did not affect the V[Combining Dot Above]O2 kinetics in maximal and supramaximal intensities within the severe-intensity domain. From a practical perspective, parameters of V[Combining Dot Above]O2 response may provide helpful information for training control as the duration of stimulus close to V[Combining Dot Above]O2max.
多纳西门托·萨尔瓦多、PC、达尔·普波、J、德卢卡斯、RD、德阿吉亚尔、RA、阿林斯、FB和古列尔莫、LGA。短跑运动员和中长跑运动员最大强度和超最大强度跑步运动中的摄氧量动力学。《力量与体能研究杂志》30(10):2857 - 2863，2016年——本研究的目的是比较短跑运动员（SPR）和中长跑运动员（MDR）在最大强度和超最大强度跑步运动中的摄氧量动力学参数。12名短跑运动员（年龄20.6±3.4岁；体重74.9±6.2千克）和10名中长跑运动员（年龄17.6±1.4岁；体重70.1±11.8千克）在不同日期进行了一次最大递增跑步测试，以确定最大摄氧量速度（vV̇O₂max），并进行了2次恒速测试，以分析在vV̇O₂max的100%和120%时的摄氧量动力学。中长跑运动员的临界速度（18.0±1.0对14.2±1.0千米·小时）、vV̇O₂max（19.4±0.7对17.2±0.8千米·小时）和100%强度下的疲劳时间（437±53对366±49秒）显著高于短跑运动员（p≤0.05）。然而，短跑运动员的无氧距离能力更强（281.3±66.1对208.0±43.4米）。尽管最大跑步速度下摄氧量动力学的平均反应时间和达到V̇O₂max的时间高于超最大跑步速度（p≤0.05），但两组在这些参数以及摄氧量慢成分方面均未发现差异（p>0.05）。本研究表明，中长跑运动员和短跑运动员不同的有氧和无氧特征在高强度范围内不影响最大强度和超最大强度下的摄氧量动力学。从实际角度来看，摄氧量反应参数可为接近V̇O₂max的刺激持续时间的训练控制提供有用信息。
Zotero 插件