Human Performance and Sports Science Laboratory, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Murcia, Spain.
J Strength Cond Res. 2019 May;33(5):1216-1221. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003121.
Pallarés, JG, Cerezuela-Espejo, V, Morán-Navarro, R, Martínez-Cava, A, Conesa, E, and Courel-Ibáñez, J. A new short track test to estimate the V[Combining Dot Above]O2max and maximal aerobic speed in well-trained runners. J Strength Cond Res 33(5): 1216-1221, 2019-This study was designed to validate a new short track test (Track(1:1)) to estimate running performance parameters maximal oxygen uptake (V[Combining Dot Above]O2max) and maximal aerobic speed (MAS), based on a laboratory treadmill protocol and gas exchange data analysis (Lab(1:1)). In addition, we compared the results with the University of Montreal Track Test (UMTT). Twenty-two well-trained male athletes (V[Combining Dot Above]O2max 60.3 ± 5.9 ml·kg·min; MAS ranged from 17.0 to 20.3 km·h) performed 4 testing protocols: 2 in laboratory (Lab(1:1)-pre and Lab(1:1)) and 2 in the field (UMTT and Track(1:1)). The Lab(1:1)-pre was designed to determine individuals' Vpeak and set initial speeds for the subsequent Lab(1:1) short ramp graded exercise testing protocol, starting at 13 km·h less than each athlete's Vpeak, with 1 km·h increments per minute until exhaustion. The Track(1:1) was a reproduction of the Lab(1:1) protocol in the field. A novel equation was yielded to estimate the V[Combining Dot Above]O2max from the Vpeak achieved in the Track(1:1). Results revealed that the UMTT significantly underestimated the Vpeak (-4.2%; bias = -0.8 km·h; p < 0.05), which notably altered the estimations (MAS: -2.6%, bias = -0.5 km·h; V[Combining Dot Above]O2max: 4.7%, bias = 2.9 ml·kg·min). In turn, data from Track(1:1) were very similar to the laboratory test and gas exchange methods (Vpeak: -0.6%, bias = <0.1 km·h; MAS: 0.3%, bias = <0.1 km·h; V[Combining Dot Above]O2max: 0.4%, bias = 0.2 ml·kg·min, p > 0.05). Thus, the current Track(1:1) test emerges as a better alternative than the UMTT to estimate maximal running performance parameters in well-trained and highly trained athletes on the field.
帕拉雷斯,JG,塞雷泽拉-埃斯佩霍,V,莫兰-纳瓦罗,R,马丁内斯-卡瓦,A,孔塞萨,E,和库雷尔-伊瓦涅斯,J。一种新的短道测试,用于估计训练有素的跑步者的最大摄氧量(V[Combining Dot Above]O2max)和最大有氧速度。J 力量与调理研究 33(5):1216-1221,2019-本研究旨在验证一种新的短道测试(Track(1:1)),以根据实验室跑步机协议和气体交换数据分析(Lab(1:1))来估计跑步表现参数最大摄氧量(V[Combining Dot Above]O2max)和最大有氧速度(MAS)。此外,我们将结果与蒙特利尔大学赛道测试(UMTT)进行了比较。22 名训练有素的男性运动员(V[Combining Dot Above]O2max 为 60.3±5.9ml·kg·min;MAS 范围为 17.0 至 20.3km·h)进行了 4 项测试方案:2 项在实验室(Lab(1:1)-pre 和 Lab(1:1))和 2 项在野外(UMTT 和 Track(1:1))。Lab(1:1)-pre 旨在确定个体的 Vpeak 并为随后的 Lab(1:1)短坡分级运动测试协议设置初始速度,起始速度比每个运动员的 Vpeak 低 13km·h,每分钟增加 1km·h,直到精疲力竭。Track(1:1)是实验室协议在野外的复制。生成了一个新方程来从 Track(1:1)中达到的 Vpeak 估计 V[Combining Dot Above]O2max。结果表明,UMTT 明显低估了 Vpeak(-4.2%;偏差=0.8km·h;p<0.05),这显著改变了估计值(MAS:-2.6%,偏差=0.5km·h;V[Combining Dot Above]O2max:4.7%,偏差=2.9ml·kg·min)。反过来,Track(1:1)的数据与实验室测试和气体交换方法非常相似(Vpeak:-0.6%,偏差=0.1km·h 以下;MAS:0.3%,偏差=0.1km·h 以下;V[Combining Dot Above]O2max:0.4%,偏差=0.2ml·kg·min,p>0.05)。因此,当前的 Track(1:1)测试在野外比 UMTT 更能成为训练有素和高度训练的运动员估计最大跑步表现参数的更好选择。