Suppr超能文献

作为实质性变化的人类胚胎构成

The Constitution of the Human Embryo as Substantial Change.

作者信息

Alvargonzález David

机构信息

University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain

出版信息

J Med Philos. 2016 Apr;41(2):172-91. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhv062. Epub 2016 Feb 4.

Abstract

This paper analyzes the transformation from the human zygote to the implanted embryo under the prism of substantial change. After a brief introduction, it vindicates the Aristotelian ideas of substance and accident, and those of substantial and accidental change. It then claims that the transformation from the multicelled zygote to the implanted embryo amounts to a substantial change. Pushing further, it contends that this substantial change cannot be explained following patterns of genetic reductionism, emergence, and self-organization, and proposes Gustavo Bueno's idea of anamorphosis as a means to encapsulate criticism against such positions.

摘要

本文从实质变化的视角分析了人类受精卵到植入胚胎的转变。在简要介绍之后,它维护了亚里士多德关于实体与偶性以及实质变化与偶性变化的观点。接着它宣称从多细胞受精卵到植入胚胎的转变相当于一种实质变化。进一步而言,它主张这种实质变化无法按照基因还原论、突现论和自组织模式来解释,并提出古斯塔沃·布埃诺的变态观念作为一种方式来概括对这些立场的批判。

相似文献

1
The Constitution of the Human Embryo as Substantial Change.
J Med Philos. 2016 Apr;41(2):172-91. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhv062. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
2
The potentiality argument in the debate relating to the beginning of personhood.
Hum Reprod Genet Ethics. 2000;6(2):19-26. doi: 10.1179/hrge.6.2.y4v1p37874v42181.
3
We Are Human Beings.
J Med Philos. 2016 Apr;41(2):148-71. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhv064. Epub 2016 Jan 24.
4
Dignity, Health, and Membership: Who Counts as One of Us?
J Med Philos. 2016 Apr;41(2):115-29. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhw001. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
5
Biological characteristics of the preembryo.
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1988;541:346-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1988.tb22272.x.
6
Ethical and moral issues of assisted reproduction.
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1991;626:605-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1991.tb37951.x.
7
The potential of the human embryo.
J Med Philos. 2007 Nov-Dec;32(6):585-618. doi: 10.1080/03605310701680973.
9
Regarding zygotes as persons: implications for public policy.
Perspect Biol Med. 2006 Autumn;49(4):602-10. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2006.0065.
10
The future-like-ours argument, personal identity, and the twinning dilemma.
Soc Theory Pract. 2003 Jul;29(3):419-30. doi: 10.5840/soctheorpract200329319.

引用本文的文献

1
The Mereotopology of Pregnancy.
J Med Philos. 2023 May 16;48(3):283-298. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhad017.
2
Pregnant Females as Historical Individuals: An Insight From the Philosophy of Evo-Devo.
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 20;11:572106. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.572106. eCollection 2020.
3
Twin Inc.
Theor Med Bioeth. 2018 Aug;39(4):301-319. doi: 10.1007/s11017-018-9461-0.
4
Dignity, Health, and Membership: Who Counts as One of Us?
J Med Philos. 2016 Apr;41(2):115-29. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhw001. Epub 2016 Feb 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Alzheimer's disease and euthanasia.
J Aging Stud. 2012 Dec;26(4):377-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2012.04.001. Epub 2012 May 9.
2
Substance ontology cannot determine the moral status of embryos.
J Med Philos. 2012 Aug;37(4):331-50. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhs026. Epub 2012 Aug 14.
3
Confronting moral pluralism in posttraditional Western societies: bioethics critically reassessed.
J Med Philos. 2011 Jun;36(3):243-60. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhr011. Epub 2011 Jul 1.
4
Four queries concerning the metaphysics of early human embryogenesis.
J Med Philos. 2008 Apr;33(2):140-57. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhn001.
5
Phenotypically concordant and discordant monozygotic twins display different DNA copy-number-variation profiles.
Am J Hum Genet. 2008 Mar;82(3):763-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2007.12.011. Epub 2008 Feb 14.
6
The potential of the human embryo.
J Med Philos. 2007 Nov-Dec;32(6):585-618. doi: 10.1080/03605310701680973.
7
The first fourteen days of human life.
New Atlantis. 2006 Summer;13:61-7.
8
Acorns and embryos. The embryo question I.
New Atlantis. 2004;7:90-100.
10
Evo-Devo: evolutionary developmental mechanisms.
Int J Dev Biol. 2003;47(7-8):491-5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验