Sone Toshimasa, Nakaya Naoki, Sugawara Yumi, Tomata Yasutake, Watanabe Takashi, Tsuji Ichiro
Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Science, Tohoku Fukushi University, Sendai, Japan; Division of Epidemiology, Department of Health Informatics and Public Health, Tohoku University School of Public Health, Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Department of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology, Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Mar;152:96-101. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.01.037. Epub 2016 Jan 26.
The association between social isolation and psychological distress among disaster survivors is inconclusive. In addition, because these previous studies were cross-sectional in design, the longitudinal association between time-varying social isolation and psychological distress was not clear. The present study examined the longitudinal association between social isolation and psychological distress after the Great East Japan Earthquake.
We analyzed longitudinal data for 959 adults who had responded to the self-report questionnaires about Lubben Social Network Scale-6 (LSNS-6) and K6 in both a community-based baseline survey (2011) and a follow-up survey (2014) after the disaster. Participants were categorized into four groups according to changes in the presence of social isolation (<12/30 of LSNS-6) at two time points (2011 and 2014): "remained socially isolated", "became not socially isolated", "remained not socially isolated", and "became socially isolated". We defined a K6 score of ≥ 10/24 as indicating the presence of psychological distress. We used multiple logistic regression analysis to estimate the adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to indicate how the change in social isolation was related to changes in psychological distress over 3 years.
Among the participants who had not shown psychological distress at the baseline, the rates of deterioration of psychological distress were significantly lower in participants who "became not socially isolated" (multivariate OR = 0.26, 95% CI = 0.08-0.70) and "remained not socially isolated" (multivariate OR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.27-0.91), compared with participants who "remained socially isolated". Among the participants who had psychological distress at the baseline, the rate of improvement of psychological distress was significantly higher in participants who "remained not socially isolated" (multivariate OR = 2.61, 95% CI = 1.08-6.44).
The present findings suggest that prevention of social isolation may be an effective public health strategy for preventing psychological distress after a natural disaster.
灾难幸存者中社会隔离与心理困扰之间的关联尚无定论。此外,由于这些先前的研究在设计上是横断面研究,随时间变化的社会隔离与心理困扰之间的纵向关联并不明确。本研究调查了东日本大地震后社会隔离与心理困扰之间的纵向关联。
我们分析了959名成年人的纵向数据,这些成年人在基于社区的基线调查(2011年)和灾后随访调查(2014年)中均对关于鲁本社会网络量表-6(LSNS-6)和K6的自我报告问卷做出了回应。参与者根据两个时间点(2011年和2014年)社会隔离情况(LSNS-6得分<12/30)的变化分为四组:“一直处于社会隔离状态”、“变得不再处于社会隔离状态”、“一直未处于社会隔离状态”和“变得处于社会隔离状态”。我们将K6得分≥10/24定义为存在心理困扰。我们使用多元逻辑回归分析来估计调整后的优势比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI),以表明社会隔离的变化与3年内心理困扰变化之间的关系。
在基线时未表现出心理困扰的参与者中,“变得不再处于社会隔离状态”(多变量OR = 0.26,95%CI = 0.08 - 0.70)和“一直未处于社会隔离状态”(多变量OR = 0.49,95%CI = 0.27 - 0.91)的参与者心理困扰恶化率显著低于“一直处于社会隔离状态”的参与者。在基线时存在心理困扰的参与者中,“一直未处于社会隔离状态”的参与者心理困扰改善率显著更高(多变量OR = 2.61,95%CI = 1.08 - 6.44)。
本研究结果表明,预防社会隔离可能是预防自然灾害后心理困扰的一项有效的公共卫生策略。