Rosenberg S A, Lotze M T, Yang J C, Linehan W M, Seipp C, Calabro S, Karp S E, Sherry R M, Steinberg S, White D E
Division of Cancer Treatment, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892.
J Clin Oncol. 1989 Dec;7(12):1863-74. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1989.7.12.1863.
We performed an escalating dose study of the combined administration of interleukin-2 (IL-2) and alpha-interferon (alpha-IFN) in 94 patients with metastatic cancer. Patients received alpha-IFN at a dose of 3 x 10(6) U/m2 in conjunction with IL-2 at doses of either 1 x 10(6) U/m2 (six patients), 3 x 10(6) U/m2 (32 patients), or 4.5 x 10(6) U/m2 (26 patients). Thirty patients received alpha-IFN at 6 x 10(6) U/m2 plus IL-2 at 4.5 x 10(6) U/m2. Patients each received cytokine as an intravenous bolus infusion every 8 hours for up to 5 consecutive days and after a 10-day rest received a second cycle of combination cytokines. Of the 91 patients evaluable for response, seven patients had a complete regression of cancer, and 18 had a partial regression. At the four increasing dose levels used in patients with renal cell cancer (35 patients) or melanoma (39 patients), objective responses were seen in 17% (of six patients), 24% (of 25 patients), 38% (of 16 patients), and 41% (of 27 patients), respectively. Of the 25 total responding patients, 16 are still responding 5 to 14 months after treatment. The toxicities associated with the combined administration of IL-2 and alpha-IFN were similar to those expected from each agent alone. There was one treatment-related death in the 94 patients treated in this study. Thus, using increasing doses of the combination of IL-2 and alpha-IFN, it appears that response rates may be related to the doses of the cytokines used, and that at the highest doses of these combination cytokines, response rates may be higher than those for either cytokine alone. A prospective randomized trial comparing the cytokine combinations with each cytokine administered alone is necessary as is the extension of this combination cytokine treatment to patients with other types of solid cancer.
我们对94例转移性癌症患者进行了白细胞介素-2(IL-2)与α-干扰素(α-IFN)联合应用的递增剂量研究。患者接受剂量为3×10⁶U/m²的α-IFN,同时联合剂量为1×10⁶U/m²(6例患者)、3×10⁶U/m²(32例患者)或4.5×10⁶U/m²(26例患者)的IL-2。30例患者接受剂量为6×10⁶U/m²的α-IFN加剂量为4.5×10⁶U/m²的IL-2。患者每8小时静脉推注一次细胞因子,连续5天,休息10天后接受第二个周期的联合细胞因子治疗。在91例可评估反应的患者中,7例患者癌症完全消退,18例部分消退。在用于肾细胞癌(35例患者)或黑色素瘤(39例患者)的四个递增剂量水平上,客观反应率分别为17%(6例患者中的)、24%(25例患者中的)、38%(16例患者中的)和41%(27例患者中的)。在总共25例有反应的患者中,16例在治疗后5至14个月仍有反应。IL-2与α-IFN联合应用的毒性与单独使用每种药物预期的毒性相似。在本研究治疗的94例患者中有1例与治疗相关的死亡。因此,使用递增剂量的IL-2与α-IFN联合应用,似乎反应率可能与所用细胞因子的剂量有关,并且在这些联合细胞因子的最高剂量下,反应率可能高于单独使用任何一种细胞因子时的反应率。有必要进行一项前瞻性随机试验,比较细胞因子联合应用与单独应用每种细胞因子的情况,并且有必要将这种联合细胞因子治疗扩展到其他类型实体癌患者。