Frye Christopher, Deshpande Rohini, Estes Scott, Francissen Kathy, Joly John, Lubiniecki Anthony, Munro Trent, Russell Reb, Wang Tongtong, Anderson Karin
Eli Lilly & Company, Indianapolis, IN 46285, United States.
Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA, United States.
Biologicals. 2016 Mar;44(2):117-22. doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2016.01.001. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
Recently, several health authorities have requested substantial detail from sponsor firms regarding the practices employed to generate the production cell line for recombinant DNA-(rDNA) derived biopharmaceuticals. Two possible inferences from these regulatory agency questions are that (1) assurance of "clonality" of the production cell line is of major importance to assessing the safety and efficacy of the product and (2), without adequate proof of "clonality", additional studies of the cell line and product are often required to further ensure the product's purity and homogeneity. Here we address the topic of "clonality" in the broader context of product quality assurance by current technologies and practices, as well as discuss some of the relevant science and historical perspective. We agree that the clonal derivation of a production cell line is one factor with potential impact, but it is only one of many factors. Further, we believe that regulatory emphasis should be primarily placed on ensuring product quality of the material actually administered to patients, and on ensuring process consistency and implementing appropriate control strategies through the life cycle of the products.
最近,几家卫生当局要求申办公司提供有关用于生产重组DNA(rDNA)衍生生物制药的生产细胞系的详细信息。从这些监管机构的问题中可以得出两个可能的推论:(1)生产细胞系的“克隆性”保证对于评估产品的安全性和有效性至关重要;(2)如果没有足够的“克隆性”证据,通常需要对细胞系和产品进行额外研究,以进一步确保产品的纯度和均一性。在此,我们将在当前技术和实践的产品质量保证的更广泛背景下探讨“克隆性”这一主题,并讨论一些相关科学和历史观点。我们同意生产细胞系的克隆衍生是一个可能有影响的因素,但它只是众多因素之一。此外,我们认为监管重点应主要放在确保实际给予患者的物质的产品质量上,以及确保整个产品生命周期内的工艺一致性并实施适当的控制策略。