Newman David J, Cragg Gordon M
NIH Special Volunteer, Wayne, Pennsylvania 19087, United States.
NIH Special Volunteer, Bethesda, Maryland 20814, United States.
J Nat Prod. 2016 Mar 25;79(3):629-61. doi: 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.5b01055. Epub 2016 Feb 7.
This contribution is a completely updated and expanded version of the four prior analogous reviews that were published in this journal in 1997, 2003, 2007, and 2012. In the case of all approved therapeutic agents, the time frame has been extended to cover the 34 years from January 1, 1981, to December 31, 2014, for all diseases worldwide, and from 1950 (earliest so far identified) to December 2014 for all approved antitumor drugs worldwide. As mentioned in the 2012 review, we have continued to utilize our secondary subdivision of a "natural product mimic", or "NM", to join the original primary divisions and the designation "natural product botanical", or "NB", to cover those botanical "defined mixtures" now recognized as drug entities by the U.S. FDA (and similar organizations). From the data presented in this review, the utilization of natural products and/or their novel structures, in order to discover and develop the final drug entity, is still alive and well. For example, in the area of cancer, over the time frame from around the 1940s to the end of 2014, of the 175 small molecules approved, 131, or 75%, are other than "S" (synthetic), with 85, or 49%, actually being either natural products or directly derived therefrom. In other areas, the influence of natural product structures is quite marked, with, as expected from prior information, the anti-infective area being dependent on natural products and their structures. We wish to draw the attention of readers to the rapidly evolving recognition that a significant number of natural product drugs/leads are actually produced by microbes and/or microbial interactions with the "host from whence it was isolated", and therefore it is considered that this area of natural product research should be expanded significantly.
本论文是对之前于1997年、2003年、2007年和2012年发表在本期刊上的四篇类似综述的全面更新和扩展版本。对于所有已批准的治疗药物,时间范围已延长至涵盖全球所有疾病从1981年1月1日至2014年12月31日的34年,以及全球所有已批准的抗肿瘤药物从1950年(迄今最早确定的时间)至2014年12月的时间。如2012年综述中所述,我们继续采用“天然产物类似物”(“NM”)这一二级细分来加入原来的一级分类,并采用“天然产物植物药”(“NB”)这一名称来涵盖那些现已被美国食品药品监督管理局(及类似机构)认定为药物实体的植物“特定混合物”。从本综述所呈现的数据来看,利用天然产物及其新颖结构来发现和开发最终药物实体的做法依然活跃且成效显著。例如,在癌症领域,从20世纪40年代左右至2014年底的时间范围内,在已批准的175种小分子药物中,有131种(即75%)并非“合成”(“S”)类药物,其中85种(即49%)实际上是天然产物或直接由其衍生而来。在其他领域,天然产物结构的影响也十分显著,正如先前信息所预期的那样,抗感染领域依赖于天然产物及其结构。我们希望提请读者注意一个迅速发展的认识,即大量天然产物药物/先导物实际上是由微生物和/或微生物与“分离出它们的宿主”的相互作用产生的,因此认为天然产物研究的这一领域应大幅扩展。