Miguel Carmen S, Martins Paula A, Moleda Nathalya, Klein Margarete, Chaim-Avancini Tiffany, Gobbo Maria A, Alves Tania M, Silva Maria A, Louzã Mario R
Research Program for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in Adults, Department of Psychiatry, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, Rua Dr. Ovídio Pires de Campos, 785-3° Andar, 05403-010 São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Program for Early Evaluation and Treatment of Psychosis, Department of Psychiatry, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, Rua Dr. Ovídio Pires de Campos, 785-3° Andar, 05403-010 São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016 Mar 1;160:97-104. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.12.040. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
Substance use disorder (SUD) is a common comorbidity in adults with attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). However,there have been few studies on cognitive profiles of these patients. Impulsivity is also commonly increased in both disorders. The central aim of this study was to compare cognition and impulsivity in subjects who had ADHD and cocaine dependence (ADHD+COC group) to those with ADHD only (ADHD-noSUD group). We hypothesized that the ADHD+COC group would show more marked cognitive dysfunction and greater impulsivity than their counterparts with ADHD only.
A total of 70 adult patients diagnosed with ADHD according to (DSM-IV-TR) criteria were enrolled; 36 with ADHD+COC and 34 with ADHD-noSUD. All study participants were evaluated with a sociodemographic questionnaire; the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview; the Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale; the Addiction Severity Index; the Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test; the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale; and a comprehensive neurocognitive battery.
Compared to individuals with ADHD-noSUD, ADHD+COC individuals had significantly lower mean IQ and higher motor impulsivity. On average, the ADHD+COC group also performed more poorly on tasks assessing verbal skills, vigilance, implicit learning during decision making, and ADHD-noSUD performed more poorly on selective attention, information processing, and visual search.
Our results support the integrative theory of ADHD based on the cognitive and affective neuroscience model, and suggests that ADHD-noSUD patients have impairments in cognitive regulation, while ADHD+COC patients have impairments in both cognitive and affective regulation.
物质使用障碍(SUD)是成人注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)常见的共病情况。然而,针对这些患者认知特征的研究较少。冲动性在这两种疾病中也普遍增加。本研究的主要目的是比较患有ADHD和可卡因依赖的受试者(ADHD+COC组)与仅患有ADHD的受试者(ADHD无物质使用障碍组)的认知和冲动性。我们假设ADHD+COC组比仅患有ADHD的对照组会表现出更明显的认知功能障碍和更高的冲动性。
根据(《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版修订版)(DSM-IV-TR)标准,共纳入70名被诊断为ADHD的成年患者;36名患有ADHD+COC,34名患有ADHD无物质使用障碍。所有研究参与者均接受社会人口学问卷调查、迷你国际神经精神访谈、成人ADHD自我报告量表、成瘾严重程度指数、酒精、吸烟和物质使用筛查测试、巴拉特冲动性量表以及全面的神经认知测试。
与ADHD无物质使用障碍个体相比,ADHD+COC个体的平均智商显著更低,运动冲动性更高。平均而言,ADHD+COC组在评估语言技能、警觉性、决策过程中的内隐学习等任务上表现更差,而ADHD无物质使用障碍组在选择性注意、信息处理和视觉搜索方面表现更差。
我们的结果支持基于认知和情感神经科学模型的ADHD综合理论,并表明ADHD无物质使用障碍患者在认知调节方面存在缺陷,而ADHD+COC患者在认知和情感调节方面均存在缺陷。