Prud'homme Michel, Mathieu François, Marcotte Nicolas, Cottin Sylvine
Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec,Axe neurosciences,Université Laval,Quebec City,Canada.
Can J Neurol Sci. 2016 Mar;43(2):284-90. doi: 10.1017/cjn.2015.393. Epub 2016 Feb 8.
Current opinions regarding the use of dexamethasone in the treatment of chronic subdural hematomas (CSDH) are only based on observational studies. Moreover, the use of corticosteroids in asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic patient with this condition remains controversial. Here, we present data from a prospective randomized pilot study of CSDH patients treated with dexamethasone or placebo.
Twenty patients with imaging-confirmed CSDH were recruited from a single center and randomized to receive dexamethasone (12 mg/day for 3 weeks followed by tapering) or placebo as a conservative treatment. Patients were followed for 6 months and the rate of success of conservative treatment with dexamethasone versus placebo was measured. Parameters such as hematoma thickness and clinical changes were also compared before and after treatment with chi-square tests. Adverse events and complications were documented.
During the 6-month follow-up, one of ten patients treated with corticosteroids had to undergo surgical drainage and three of ten patients were treated surgically after placebo treatment. At the end of the study, all remaining patients had complete radiological resolution. No significant differences were observed in terms of hematoma thickness profile and impression of change; however, patients experienced more severe side effects when treated with steroids as compared with placebo. Dexamethasone contributed to many serious adverse events.
Given the small sample size, these preliminary results have not shown a clear beneficial effect of dexamethasone against placebo in our patients. However, the number of secondary effects reported was much greater for corticosteroids, and dexamethasone treatment was responsible for significant complications.
目前关于地塞米松用于治疗慢性硬膜下血肿(CSDH)的观点仅基于观察性研究。此外,在无症状或症状轻微的此类患者中使用皮质类固醇仍存在争议。在此,我们展示了一项关于用地塞米松或安慰剂治疗CSDH患者的前瞻性随机试验研究的数据。
从单一中心招募20例经影像学确诊的CSDH患者,随机分为接受地塞米松(12毫克/天,持续3周,随后逐渐减量)或安慰剂作为保守治疗。对患者进行6个月的随访,测量地塞米松与安慰剂保守治疗的成功率。还通过卡方检验比较治疗前后血肿厚度和临床变化等参数。记录不良事件和并发症。
在6个月的随访期间,接受皮质类固醇治疗的10例患者中有1例不得不接受手术引流,接受安慰剂治疗的10例患者中有3例接受了手术治疗。在研究结束时,所有剩余患者的影像学表现均完全恢复。在血肿厚度变化和变化印象方面未观察到显著差异;然而,与安慰剂相比,接受类固醇治疗的患者出现了更严重的副作用。地塞米松导致了许多严重的不良事件。
鉴于样本量较小,这些初步结果并未显示地塞米松对我们的患者有明显优于安慰剂的效果。然而,报告的皮质类固醇的副作用数量要多得多,且地塞米松治疗导致了显著的并发症。