• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非遗传毒性物质急性经口暴露的阈剂量(TTC)。

A TTC threshold for acute oral exposure to non-genotoxic substances.

作者信息

Buist Harrie E, Krul Lisette, Leeman Winfried R

机构信息

TNO, PO Box 360, 3700 AJ Zeist, The Netherlands.

TNO, PO Box 360, 3700 AJ Zeist, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2016 Apr;76:217-20. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2016.01.022. Epub 2016 Feb 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.yrtph.2016.01.022
PMID:26853733
Abstract

To derive an acute TTC threshold, the correlation between Allowable Daily Intakes (ADIs, chronic values) and Acute Reference Doses (ARfDs) of pesticides evaluated in the EU was investigated and their distributions were compared. The correlation between ARfDs and ADIs was significant (p = 0.01), but weak (r(2) = 0.051). Consequently, using this approach to derive acute TTC values does not seem valid. Therefore, the distributions of ARfDs and ADIs were compared directly, in order to extrapolate from chronic to acute TTC values. This comparison made for the combined Cramer structural class II and III pesticides showed a ratio ARfD/ADI of approximately 3 at the fifth percentile of the distributions. Based on these results, it is justified to propose a TTC for acute effects for Cramer III substances by multiplying the Cramer class III TTC threshold of 90 μg/person/day with a factor 3. This leads to an acute TTC threshold based on the Munro dataset for Cramer class III substances of 270 μg/person/day.

摘要

为得出急性经皮毒性阈值(TTC),研究了欧盟评估的农药每日允许摄入量(ADI,慢性值)与急性参考剂量(ARfD)之间的相关性,并比较了它们的分布情况。ARfD与ADI之间的相关性显著(p = 0.01),但较弱(r² = 0.051)。因此,用这种方法得出急性TTC值似乎并不有效。所以,直接比较了ARfD和ADI的分布,以便从慢性TTC值推断急性TTC值。对克莱默结构分类II和III农药的综合比较显示,在分布的第五百分位数处,ARfD/ADI的比值约为3。基于这些结果,通过将克莱默III类物质的TTC阈值90μg/人/天乘以3来提出克莱默III类物质急性效应的TTC是合理的。这就得出了基于门罗数据集的克莱默III类物质急性TTC阈值为270μg/人/天。

相似文献

1
A TTC threshold for acute oral exposure to non-genotoxic substances.非遗传毒性物质急性经口暴露的阈剂量(TTC)。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2016 Apr;76:217-20. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2016.01.022. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
2
Internal threshold of toxicological concern values: enabling route-to-route extrapolation.毒理学关注阈值:实现不同暴露途径间的外推
Arch Toxicol. 2015 Jun;89(6):941-8. doi: 10.1007/s00204-014-1287-6. Epub 2014 Jun 12.
3
Improvement of the Cramer classification for oral exposure using the database TTC RepDose--a strategy description.利用 TTC RepDose 数据库改进口腔暴露的 Cramer 分类——策略描述。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2011 Dec;61(3):340-50. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2011.09.005. Epub 2011 Sep 29.
4
Bolstering the existing database supporting the non-cancer Threshold of Toxicological Concern values with toxicity data on fragrance-related materials.用与香料相关的物质的毒性数据来支持现有的非癌症毒理学关注阈值的现有数据库。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2020 Oct;116:104718. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2020.104718. Epub 2020 Jun 27.
5
Evaluation of inhalation TTC values with the database RepDose.评估吸入 TTC 值与 RepDose 数据库。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2010 Nov;58(2):259-74. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2010.06.009. Epub 2010 Jun 23.
6
Reliability of the TTC approach: learning from inclusion of pesticide active substances in the supporting database.TTC方法的可靠性:从支持数据库中纳入农药活性物质中汲取经验。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2015 Jan;75:24-38. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2014.10.016. Epub 2014 Nov 10.
7
Reevaluation of the Munro dataset to derive more specific TTC thresholds.重新评估门罗数据集以得出更具体的TTC阈值。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2014 Jul;69(2):273-8. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.04.015. Epub 2014 May 4.
8
Testing the thresholds of toxicological concern values using a new database for food-related substances.利用新的食品相关物质数据库测试毒理学关注阈值。
Toxicol Lett. 2019 Oct 10;314:117-123. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2019.07.019. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
9
Evaluating potential refinements to existing Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) values for environmentally-relevant compounds.评估现有毒理学关注阈值 (TTC) 值在环境相关化合物方面的潜在改进。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2019 Dec;109:104505. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2019.104505. Epub 2019 Oct 19.
10
Threshold of Toxicological Concern: Extending the chemical space by inclusion of a highly curated dataset for organosilicon compounds.毒理学关注阈值:通过包含经过高度策展的有机硅化合物数据集来扩展化学空间。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2021 Dec;127:105074. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2021.105074. Epub 2021 Oct 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Characterization of medical device constituents and development of duration-based non-cancer threshold of toxicological concern values.医疗器械成分的表征及基于持续时间的毒理学关注阈值的非癌症阈值的制定。
Front Toxicol. 2025 Jun 4;7:1600127. doi: 10.3389/ftox.2025.1600127. eCollection 2025.