Gurd Brendon J, Giles Matthew D, Bonafiglia Jacob T, Raleigh James P, Boyd John C, Ma Jasmin K, Zelt Jason G E, Scribbans Trisha D
School of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada.
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016 Mar;41(3):229-34. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2015-0449. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
The current study sought to explore the incidence of nonresponders for maximal or submaximal performance following a variety of sprint interval training (SIT) protocols. Data from 63 young adults from 5 previously published studies were utilized in the current analysis. Nonresponders were identified using 2 times the typical error (TE) of measurement for peak oxygen uptake (2 × TE = 1.74 mL/(kg·min)), lactate threshold (2 × TE = 15.7 W), or 500 kcal time-to-completion (TTC; 2 × TE = 306 s) trial. TE was determined on separate groups of participants by calculating the test-retest variance for each outcome. The overall rate of nonresponders for peak oxygen uptake across all participants studied was 22% (14/63) with 4 adverse responders observed. No nonresponders for peak oxygen uptake were observed in studies where participants trained 4 times per week (n = 18), while higher rates were observed in most studies requiring training 3 times per week (30%-50%; n = 45). A nonresponse rate of 44% (8/18) and 50% (11/22) was observed for the TTC test and lactate threshold, respectively. No significant correlations were observed between the changes in peak oxygen uptake and TTC (r = 0.014; p = 0.96) or lactate threshold (r = 0.17; p = 0.44). The current analysis demonstrates a significant incidence of nonresponders for peak oxygen uptake and heterogeneity in the individual patterns of response following SIT. Additionally, these data support the importance of training dose and suggest that the incidence of nonresponse may be mitigated by utilizing the optimal dose of SIT.
本研究旨在探讨在多种冲刺间歇训练(SIT)方案后,最大或次最大运动表现无反应者的发生率。本分析使用了来自5项先前发表研究的63名年轻成年人的数据。无反应者通过以下指标的测量典型误差(TE)的2倍来确定:峰值摄氧量(2×TE = 1.74 mL/(kg·min))、乳酸阈(2×TE = 15.7 W)或完成500千卡的时间(TTC;2×TE = 306 s)试验。通过计算每个结果的重测方差,在不同的参与者组中确定TE。在所有研究的参与者中,峰值摄氧量无反应者的总体发生率为22%(14/63),观察到4名不良反应者。在参与者每周训练4次的研究中(n = 18),未观察到峰值摄氧量无反应者,而在大多数每周训练3次的研究中(30%-50%;n = 45),观察到更高的发生率。TTC试验和乳酸阈的无反应率分别为44%(8/18)和50%(11/22)。峰值摄氧量的变化与TTC(r = 0.014;p = 0.96)或乳酸阈(r = 0.17;p = 0.44)之间未观察到显著相关性。当前分析表明,SIT后峰值摄氧量无反应者的发生率较高,且个体反应模式存在异质性。此外,这些数据支持了训练剂量的重要性,并表明通过使用最佳剂量的SIT,无反应的发生率可能会降低。
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016-3
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2017-12-21
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2017-3-1
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016-8
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2017-4
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2018-10-4
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016-7
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2025-2
World J Mens Health. 2024-10