Casaña José, Varangot-Reille Clovis, Calatayud Joaquín, Suso-Martí Luis, Sanchís-Sánchez Enrique, Aiguadé Ramón, López-Bueno Rubén, Gargallo Pedro, Cuenca-Martínez Ferran, Blanco-Díaz María
Exercise Intervention for Health Research Group (EXINH-RG), Department of Physiotherapy, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain.
Nursing and Physiotherapy Department, University of Lleida, 25008 St. Lleida, Spain.
J Clin Med. 2022 Nov 24;11(23):6937. doi: 10.3390/jcm11236937.
In order to assess the impact of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) on biological and body composition variables in patients with musculoskeletal disorders (MSKD), a systematic search on PubMed (Medline), CENTRAL, CINAHL, Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, and Scopus was conducted. Standardized mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated and pooled in a meta-analysis using the random-effects model. The effectiveness of HIIT on waist circumference, muscle mass, resting heart rate, resting systolic and diastolic blood pressure, C-reactive protein, body weight, and body fat were determined. GRADE, risk of bias 2, and PEDro scales were employed. HIIT compared to no intervention, minimal intervention, or usual care did not show significant results in its favor on any of the variables studied, except for the resting heart rate when compared with no intervention (SMD = -0.33; 95% CI: -0.63, -0.04; heterogeneity Q value: 0.14; = 0.93; I = 0%). In addition, HIIT also does not seem to be more effective than moderate-intensity continuous training. Based on the results, it seems that HIIT has almost no significant effects on biological and body composition variables, except for resting heart rate, in patients with MSKD.
为了评估高强度间歇训练(HIIT)对肌肉骨骼疾病(MSKD)患者生物学和身体成分变量的影响,我们在PubMed(Medline)、CENTRAL、CINAHL、Web of Science、SPORTDiscus和Scopus上进行了系统检索。计算标准化均值差(SMD)和95%置信区间,并使用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析合并。确定了HIIT对腰围、肌肉质量、静息心率、静息收缩压和舒张压、C反应蛋白、体重和体脂的有效性。采用了GRADE、偏倚风险2和PEDro量表。与无干预、最小干预或常规护理相比,HIIT在任何研究变量上均未显示出对其有利的显著结果,但与无干预相比,静息心率除外(SMD = -0.33;95% CI:-0.63,-0.04;异质性Q值:0.14; = 0.93;I = 0%)。此外,HIIT似乎也不比中等强度持续训练更有效。基于这些结果,在MSKD患者中,除了静息心率外,HIIT似乎对生物学和身体成分变量几乎没有显著影响。