Suppr超能文献

多倍体与多样化之间的联系是否真的得到了验证?

Has the connection between polyploidy and diversification actually been tested?

机构信息

Donald Danforth Plant Science Center, 975 North Warson Rd., St. Louis, MO 63132, USA.

出版信息

Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2016 Apr;30:25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2016.01.002. Epub 2016 Feb 8.

Abstract

Many major clades of angiosperms have several whole genome duplications (polyploidization events) in their distant past, suggesting that polyploidy drives or at least permits diversification. However, data on recently diverged groups are more equivocal, finding little evidence of elevated diversification following polyploidy. The discrepancy may be attributable at least in part to methodology. Many studies use indirect methods, such as chromosome numbers, genome size, and Ks plots, to test polyploidy, although these approaches can be misleading, and often lack sufficient resolution. A direct test of diversification following polyploidy requires a sequence-based approach that traces the history of nuclear genomes rather than species. These methods identify the point of coalescence of ancestral genomes, but may be misleading about the time and thus the extent of diversification. Limitations of existing methods mean that the connection between polyploidy and diversification has not been rigorously tested and remains unknown.

摘要

许多主要的被子植物类群在其遥远的过去都经历了几次全基因组加倍(多倍化事件),这表明多倍化驱动或至少允许了多样化。然而,关于最近分化的群体的数据则更加模棱两可,几乎没有发现多倍化后多样化程度升高的证据。这种差异至少部分归因于方法学。许多研究使用间接方法,如染色体数目、基因组大小和 Ks 图谱,来测试多倍化,尽管这些方法可能具有误导性,并且通常缺乏足够的分辨率。多倍化后多样化的直接测试需要基于序列的方法,该方法追踪核基因组的历史,而不是物种的历史。这些方法可以确定祖先基因组的并合点,但可能会对时间产生误导,从而对多样化的程度产生误导。现有方法的局限性意味着,多倍化与多样化之间的联系尚未经过严格测试,目前仍不清楚。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验