• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

忽视慢性下腰痛中的骶髂关节代价高昂。

Ignoring the sacroiliac joint in chronic low back pain is costly.

作者信息

Polly David W, Cher Daniel

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

SI-BONE, Inc., San Jose, CA, USA.

出版信息

Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2016 Jan 21;8:23-31. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S97345. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.2147/CEOR.S97345
PMID:26855595
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4725636/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Increasing evidence supports minimally invasive sacroiliac joint (SIJ) fusion as a safe and effective treatment for SIJ dysfunction. Failure to include the SIJ in the diagnostic evaluation of low back pain could result in unnecessary health care expenses.

DESIGN

Decision analytic cost model.

METHODS

A decision analytic model calculating 2-year direct health care costs in patients with chronic low back pain considering lumbar fusion surgery was used.

RESULTS

The strategy of including the SIJ in the preoperative diagnostic workup of chronic low back pain saves an expected US$3,100 per patient over 2 years. Cost savings were robust to reasonable ranges for costs and probabilities, such as the probability of diagnosis and the probability of successful surgical treatment.

CONCLUSION

Including the SIJ as part of the diagnostic strategy in preoperative patients with chronic low back pain is likely to be cost saving in the short term.

摘要

背景

越来越多的证据支持微创骶髂关节(SIJ)融合术是治疗骶髂关节功能障碍的一种安全有效的方法。在腰痛的诊断评估中未纳入骶髂关节可能会导致不必要的医疗费用。

设计

决策分析成本模型。

方法

使用一个决策分析模型来计算考虑腰椎融合手术的慢性腰痛患者两年的直接医疗费用。

结果

在慢性腰痛的术前诊断检查中纳入骶髂关节的策略,预计每位患者在两年内可节省3100美元。成本节省对于成本和概率的合理范围具有稳健性,如诊断概率和手术治疗成功概率。

结论

在慢性腰痛术前患者的诊断策略中纳入骶髂关节,短期内可能会节省成本。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0283/4725636/3e85d735744a/ceor-8-023Fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0283/4725636/89a0dd9f9b3d/ceor-8-023Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0283/4725636/6bc0bac96c72/ceor-8-023Fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0283/4725636/523005ddb60d/ceor-8-023Fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0283/4725636/3e85d735744a/ceor-8-023Fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0283/4725636/89a0dd9f9b3d/ceor-8-023Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0283/4725636/6bc0bac96c72/ceor-8-023Fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0283/4725636/523005ddb60d/ceor-8-023Fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0283/4725636/3e85d735744a/ceor-8-023Fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
Ignoring the sacroiliac joint in chronic low back pain is costly.忽视慢性下腰痛中的骶髂关节代价高昂。
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2016 Jan 21;8:23-31. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S97345. eCollection 2016.
2
Stabilization of the sacroiliac joint.骶髂关节稳定术。
Neurosurg Focus. 2013 Jul;35(2 Suppl):Editorial. doi: 10.3171/2013.V2.FOCUS13273.
3
Cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion.微创骶髂关节融合术的成本效益
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2015 Dec 18;8:1-14. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S94266. eCollection 2016.
4
Productivity benefits of minimally invasive surgery in patients with chronic sacroiliac joint dysfunction.微创手术对慢性骶髂关节功能障碍患者的生产力效益。
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2016 Apr 11;8:77-85. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S101607. eCollection 2016.
5
Recurrent Radiculopathy Following Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Successful Management with Endoscopic Sacroiliac Joint Ablation.经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术后复发性神经根病:内镜下骶髂关节消融术成功治疗
J Orthop Case Rep. 2024 May;14(5):36-41. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2024.v14.i05.4426.
6
Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion vs Conservative Management in Patients With Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.骶髂关节功能障碍患者的微创骶髂关节融合术与保守治疗:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Int J Spine Surg. 2022 Jun;16(3):472-480. doi: 10.14444/8241.
7
Two-Year Outcomes from a Randomized Controlled Trial of Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion vs. Non-Surgical Management for Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction.微创骶髂关节融合术与非手术治疗骶髂关节功能障碍的随机对照试验的两年结果
Int J Spine Surg. 2016 Aug 23;10:28. doi: 10.14444/3028. eCollection 2016.
8
Surgical and clinical efficacy of sacroiliac joint fusion: a systematic review of the literature.骶髂关节融合术的手术和临床疗效:文献系统评价。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Jul;23(1):59-66. doi: 10.3171/2014.10.SPINE14516. Epub 2015 Apr 3.
9
Triangular Titanium Implants for Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: 2-Year Follow-Up from a Prospective Multicenter Trial.用于微创骶髂关节融合的三角形钛植入物:一项前瞻性多中心试验的2年随访
Int J Spine Surg. 2016 Apr 20;10:13. doi: 10.14444/3013. eCollection 2016.
10
Successful Diagnosis of Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction.骶髂关节功能障碍的成功诊断
J Pain Res. 2021 Oct 8;14:3135-3143. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S327351. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Minimally invasive sacroiliac fusion: current insights and a comprehensive literature review.微创骶髂关节融合术:当前见解与全面文献综述
Turk J Med Sci. 2024 Jul 1;54(6):1185-1191. doi: 10.55730/1300-0144.5898. eCollection 2024.
2
Effect of revision sacroiliac joint fusion on unresolved pain and disability: a retrospective cohort study.骶髂关节融合翻修术对未解决的疼痛和残疾的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
Eur Spine J. 2024 Feb;33(2):533-542. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-08104-6. Epub 2024 Jan 9.
3
Cooled radiofrequency ablation of the sacroiliac joint a retrospective case series.

本文引用的文献

1
Triangular Titanium Implants for Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: A Prospective Study.三角钛植入物微创性骶髂关节融合术:一项前瞻性研究。
Global Spine J. 2016 May;6(3):257-69. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1562912. Epub 2015 Aug 11.
2
Implant survivorship analysis after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion using the iFuse Implant System(®).使用iFuse植入系统(®)进行微创骶髂关节融合术后的植入物存活率分析。
Med Devices (Auckl). 2015 Nov 23;8:485-92. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S94885. eCollection 2015.
3
Letter: Industry Sponsorship of Spine Device Trials Is the Norm.
冷却射频消融治疗骶髂关节:回顾性病例系列研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Apr 4;24(1):261. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06344-7.
4
The efficacy of primary sacroiliac joint fusion for low back pain caused by sacroiliac joint pathology: a systematic review and meta-analysis.原发性骶髂关节融合术治疗骶髂关节病变引起的下腰痛的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Spine J. 2022 Oct;31(10):2461-2472. doi: 10.1007/s00586-022-07291-y. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
5
Sacral Dysmorphism Increases the Risk of Superior Gluteal Artery Injury in Percutaneous Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: Case Report and Literature Review.骶骨发育异常增加经皮骶髂关节融合术中臀上动脉损伤的风险:病例报告及文献综述
Cureus. 2021 Nov 13;13(11):e19532. doi: 10.7759/cureus.19532. eCollection 2021 Nov.
6
Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion using a novel hydroxyapatite-coated screw: final 2-year clinical and radiographic results.使用新型羟基磷灰石涂层螺钉的微创骶髂关节融合术:2年最终临床和影像学结果
J Spine Surg. 2021 Jun;7(2):155-161. doi: 10.21037/jss-20-627.
7
A Closer Look into the Association between the Sacroiliac Joint and Low Back Pain.深入探究骶髂关节与下背痛之间的关联
Spartan Med Res J. 2021 Apr 13;6(1):21971. doi: 10.51894/001c.21971.
8
Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: The Current Evidence.微创骶髂关节融合术:当前证据
Int J Spine Surg. 2020 Feb 10;14(Suppl 1):20-29. doi: 10.14444/6072. eCollection 2020 Feb.
9
Reliability and validity of a new clinical test for assessment of the sacroiliac joint dysfunction.一种用于评估骶髂关节功能障碍的新临床测试的可靠性和有效性。
Hong Kong Physiother J. 2018 Jun;38(1):13-22. doi: 10.1142/S1013702518500026. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
10
The efficacy and safety of using cooled radiofrequency in treating chronic sacroiliac joint pain: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis.使用冷却射频治疗慢性骶髂关节疼痛的疗效和安全性:一项符合PRISMA标准的Meta分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Feb;97(6):e9809. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009809.
Neurosurgery. 2016 Mar;78(3):E475-6. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001134.
4
Randomized Controlled Trial of Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using Triangular Titanium Implants vs Nonsurgical Management for Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction: 12-Month Outcomes.使用三角形钛植入物的微创骶髂关节融合术与非手术治疗骶髂关节功能障碍的随机对照试验:12个月的结果。
Neurosurgery. 2015 Nov;77(5):674-90; discussion 690-1. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000988.
5
Outcomes of bilateral sacroiliac joint fusions and the importance of understanding potential coexisting lumbosacral pathology that might also require surgical treatment.双侧骶髂关节融合术的结果以及了解可能还需要手术治疗的潜在并存腰骶部病变的重要性。
Acta Orthop Belg. 2015 Jun;81(2):233-9.
6
A systematic review of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion utilizing a lateral transarticular technique.一项利用外侧经关节技术进行微创骶髂关节融合术的系统评价。
Int J Spine Surg. 2015 Jul 22;9:40. doi: 10.14444/2040. eCollection 2015.
7
The prevalence of sacroiliac joint degeneration in asymptomatic adults.无症状成年人中骶髂关节退变的流行率。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Jun 3;97(11):932-6. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.01101.
8
Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using Triangular Titanium Implants vs. Non-Surgical Management: Six-Month Outcomes from a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.使用三角形钛植入物与非手术治疗的骶髂关节融合术:一项前瞻性随机对照试验的六个月结果
Int J Spine Surg. 2015 Mar 5;9:6. doi: 10.14444/2006. eCollection 2015.
9
Spine device clinical trials: design and sponsorship.脊柱器械临床试验:设计与赞助
Spine J. 2015 May 1;15(5):1133-40. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.01.027. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
10
Five-year clinical and radiographic outcomes after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion using triangular implants.使用三角形植入物进行微创骶髂关节融合术后的五年临床和影像学结果。
Open Orthop J. 2014 Oct 17;8:375-83. doi: 10.2174/1874325001408010375. eCollection 2014.