文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

Two-Year Outcomes from a Randomized Controlled Trial of Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion vs. Non-Surgical Management for Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction.

作者信息

Polly David W, Swofford John, Whang Peter G, Frank Clay J, Glaser John A, Limoni Robert P, Cher Daniel J, Wine Kathryn D, Sembrano Jonathan N

机构信息

Departments of Orthopedic Surgery and Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.

Indiana Interventional Pain, Indiana Surgery Center East, Indianapolis, IN.

出版信息

Int J Spine Surg. 2016 Aug 23;10:28. doi: 10.14444/3028. eCollection 2016.


DOI:10.14444/3028
PMID:27652199
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5027818/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) dysfunction is an important and underappreciated cause of chronic low back pain. OBJECTIVE: To prospectively and concurrently compare outcomes after surgical and non-surgical treatment for chronic SIJ dysfunction. METHODS: One hundred and forty-eight subjects with SIJ dysfunction were randomly assigned to minimally invasive SIJ fusion with triangular titanium implants (SIJF, n = 102) or non-surgical management (NSM, n = 46). SIJ pain (measured with a 100-point visual analog scale, VAS), disability (measured with Oswestry Disability Index, ODI) and quality of life scores were collected at baseline and at scheduled visits to 24 months. Crossover from non-surgical to surgical care was allowed after the 6-month study visit was complete. Improvements in continuous measures were compared using repeated measures analysis of variance. The proportions of subjects with clinical improvement (SIJ pain improvement ≥20 points, ODI ≥15 points) and substantial clinical benefit (SIJ pain improvement ≥25 points or SIJ pain rating ≤35, ODI ≥18.8 points) were compared. RESULTS: In the SIJF group, mean SIJ pain improved rapidly and was sustained (mean improvement of 55.4 points) at month 24. The 6-month mean change in the NSM group (12.2 points) was substantially smaller than that in the SIJF group (by 38.3 points, p<.0001 for superiority). By month 24, 83.1% and 82.0% received either clinical improvement or substantial clinical benefit in VAS SIJ pain score. Similarly, 68.2% and 65.9% had received clinical improvement or substantial clinical benefit in ODI score at month 24. In the NSM group, these proportions were <10% with non-surgical treatment only. Parallel changes were seen for EQ-5D and SF-36, with larger changes in the surgery group at 6 months compared to NSM. The rate of adverse events related to SIJF was low and only 3 subjects assigned to SIJF underwent revision surgery within the 24-month follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: In this Level 1 multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial, minimally invasive SIJF with triangular titanium implants provided larger improvements in pain, disability and quality of life compared to NSM. Improvements after SIJF persisted to 24 months. This study was approved by a local or central IRB before any subjects were enrolled. All patients provided study-specific informed consent prior to participation.

摘要

相似文献

[1]
Two-Year Outcomes from a Randomized Controlled Trial of Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion vs. Non-Surgical Management for Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction.

Int J Spine Surg. 2016-8-23

[2]
1-Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Conservative Management vs. Minimally Invasive Surgical Treatment for Sacroiliac Joint Pain.

Pain Physician. 2017-9

[3]
Six-month outcomes from a randomized controlled trial of minimally invasive SI joint fusion with triangular titanium implants vs conservative management.

Eur Spine J. 2017-3

[4]
Triangular Titanium Implants for Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: 2-Year Follow-Up from a Prospective Multicenter Trial.

Int J Spine Surg. 2016-4-20

[5]
Effects of BMI on SI joint fusion outcomes: examining the evidence to improve insurance guidelines.

Spine J. 2024-5

[6]
Long-term prospective outcomes after minimally invasive trans-iliac sacroiliac joint fusion using triangular titanium implants.

Med Devices (Auckl). 2018-4-9

[7]
Randomized Controlled Trial of Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using Triangular Titanium Implants vs Nonsurgical Management for Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction: 12-Month Outcomes.

Neurosurgery. 2015-11

[8]
Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using Triangular Titanium Implants vs. Non-Surgical Management: Six-Month Outcomes from a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

Int J Spine Surg. 2015-3-5

[9]
Predictors of Outcome in Conservative and Minimally Invasive Surgical Management of Pain Originating From the Sacroiliac Joint: A Pooled Analysis.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017-11-1

[10]
Durable intermediate-to long-term outcomes after minimally invasive transiliac sacroiliac joint fusion using triangular titanium implants.

Med Devices (Auckl). 2016-7-13

引用本文的文献

[1]
Insertional torque and pullout strength of reinserted screws for sacroiliac joint fusion: Effects of implant dimensions, bone density, and tapping.

N Am Spine Soc J. 2025-5-29

[2]
A Retrospective, Multicenter Analysis of a Novel Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Device on Safety and Efficacy at 12 Months: Access Study.

Healthcare (Basel). 2025-6-28

[3]
Minimally invasive fixation and management of sacral fibrous dysplasia with impending pathological fracture: illustrative case.

J Neurosurg Case Lessons. 2025-6-30

[4]
CT Angiographic Evaluation of Superior Gluteal Artery Branches in Lateral Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: A Pilot Study to Inform Preoperative Surgical Planning and Anatomic Parameters.

J Pain Res. 2025-6-19

[5]
Management of sacroiliac joint pain: current concepts.

Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025-5-21

[6]
Efficacy and Safety of Posterior Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: A Narrative Review of Recent Evidence.

Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2025-4-21

[7]
Minimally invasive lateral, posterior, and posterolateral sacroiliac joint fusion for low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

J Int Med Res. 2025-2

[8]
Safety and performance of a novel synthetic biomimetic scaffold for iliac crest defect reconstruction during surgical treatment of pelvic girdle pain: a first-in-human trial.

Br Med Bull. 2025-1-16

[9]
Concerns regarding sham-controlled trial of SI joint fusion procedure.

EClinicalMedicine. 2024-12-16

[10]
Triangular titanium implants for sacroiliac joint fusion.

Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024-11-18

本文引用的文献

[1]
Durable intermediate-to long-term outcomes after minimally invasive transiliac sacroiliac joint fusion using triangular titanium implants.

Med Devices (Auckl). 2016-7-13

[2]
Six-month outcomes from a randomized controlled trial of minimally invasive SI joint fusion with triangular titanium implants vs conservative management.

Eur Spine J. 2017-3

[3]
Triangular Titanium Implants for Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: 2-Year Follow-Up from a Prospective Multicenter Trial.

Int J Spine Surg. 2016-4-20

[4]
Productivity benefits of minimally invasive surgery in patients with chronic sacroiliac joint dysfunction.

Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2016-4-11

[5]
Does Level of Response to SI Joint Block Predict Response to SI Joint Fusion?

Int J Spine Surg. 2016-1-21

[6]
Ignoring the sacroiliac joint in chronic low back pain is costly.

Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2016-1-21

[7]
Cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion.

Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2015-12-18

[8]
Quality of life in preoperative patients with sacroiliac joint dysfunction is at least as depressed as in other lumbar spinal conditions.

Med Devices (Auckl). 2015-9-16

[9]
Randomized Controlled Trial of Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using Triangular Titanium Implants vs Nonsurgical Management for Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction: 12-Month Outcomes.

Neurosurgery. 2015-11

[10]
Is the Oswestry Disability Index a valid measure of response to sacroiliac joint treatment?

Qual Life Res. 2016-2

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索