Harrison Theresa M, Bookheimer Susan Y
Neuroscience Interdepartmental Graduate Program, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA; Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA.
Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA; Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA.
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2016 Jan 1;1(1):14-23. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2015.09.003.
Better characterization of the preclinical phase of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is needed in order to develop effective interventions. Neuropathological changes in AD, including neuronal loss and the formation of proteinaceous deposits, begin up to 20 years before the onset of clinical symptoms. As such, the emergence of cognitive impairment should not be the sole basis used to diagnose AD nor to evaluate individuals for enrollment in clinical trials for preventative AD treatments. Instead, early preclinical biomarkers of disease and genetic risk should be used to determine most likely prognosis and enroll individuals in appropriate clinical trials. Neuroimaging-based biomarkers and genetic analysis together present a powerful system for classifying preclinical pathology in patients. Disease modifying interventions are more likely to produce positive outcomes when administered early in the course of AD. In this review, we examine the utility of the neuroimaging genetics field as it applies to AD and early detection during the preclinical phase. Neuroimaging studies focused on single genetic risk factors are summarized. However, we particularly focus on the recent increased interest in polygenic methods and discuss the benefits and disadvantages of these approaches. We discuss challenges in the neuroimaging genetics field, including limitations of statistical power arising from small effect sizes and the over-use of cross-sectional designs. Despite the limitations, neuroimaging genetics has already begun to influence clinical trial design and will play a major role in the prevention of AD.
为了开发有效的干预措施,需要更好地描述阿尔茨海默病(AD)的临床前阶段。AD的神经病理学变化,包括神经元丢失和蛋白质沉积物的形成,在临床症状出现前20年就已开始。因此,认知障碍的出现不应是诊断AD的唯一依据,也不应作为评估个体是否适合参加AD预防性治疗临床试验的唯一标准。相反,应使用疾病和遗传风险的早期临床前生物标志物来确定最可能的预后,并让个体参加适当的临床试验。基于神经影像学的生物标志物和基因分析共同构成了一个强大的系统,用于对患者的临床前病理进行分类。当在AD病程早期给予疾病修饰干预时,更有可能产生积极的结果。在这篇综述中,我们探讨了神经影像学遗传学领域在AD及临床前阶段早期检测中的应用。总结了聚焦于单一遗传风险因素的神经影像学研究。然而,我们特别关注最近对多基因方法的兴趣增加,并讨论这些方法的优缺点。我们讨论了神经影像学遗传学领域的挑战,包括效应量小导致的统计效力局限性以及横断面设计的过度使用。尽管存在局限性,神经影像学遗传学已经开始影响临床试验设计,并将在AD的预防中发挥重要作用。