Suppr超能文献

恒河猴中基于事件的前瞻性干扰。

Event-based proactive interference in rhesus monkeys.

作者信息

Devkar Deepna T, Wright Anthony A

机构信息

Department of Neurobiology & Anatomy, The University of Texas Medical School, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Oct;23(5):1474-1482. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1005-x.

Abstract

Three rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) were tested in a same/different memory task for proactive interference (PI) from prior trials. PI occurs when a previous sample stimulus appears as a test stimulus on a later trial, does not match the current sample stimulus, and the wrong response "same" is made. Trial-unique pictures (scenes, objects, animals, etc.) were used on most trials, except on trials where the test stimulus matched potentially interfering sample stimulus from a prior trial (1, 2, 4, 8, or 16 trials prior). Greater interference occurred when fewer trials separated interference and test. PI functions showed a continuum of interference. Delays between sample and test stimuli and intertrial intervals were manipulated to test how PI might vary as a function of elapsed time. Contrary to a similar study with pigeons, these time manipulations had no discernable effect on the monkey's PI, as shown by compete overlap of PI functions with no statistical differences or interactions. These results suggested that interference was strictly based upon the number of intervening events (trials with other pictures) without regard to elapsed time. The monkeys' apparent event-based interference was further supported by retesting with a novel set of 1,024 pictures. PI from novel pictures 1 or 2 trials prior was greater than from familiar pictures, a familiar set of 1,024 pictures. Moreover, when potentially interfering novel stimuli were 16 trials prior, performance accuracy was actually greater than accuracy on baseline trials (no interference), suggesting that remembering stimuli from 16 trials prior was a cue that this stimulus was not the sample stimulus on the current trial-a somewhat surprising conclusion particularly given monkeys.

摘要

三只恒河猴(猕猴)接受了一项相同/不同记忆任务测试,以考察先前试验产生的前摄干扰(PI)。当先前的样本刺激在后续试验中作为测试刺激出现,与当前样本刺激不匹配,且做出错误的“相同”反应时,就会发生前摄干扰。除了测试刺激与先前试验(提前1、2、4、8或16次试验)中可能产生干扰的样本刺激相匹配的试验外,大多数试验使用的是每次试验都不同的图片(场景、物体、动物等)。干扰与测试之间间隔的试验次数越少,干扰就越大。前摄干扰函数呈现出连续的干扰情况。对样本刺激与测试刺激之间的延迟以及试验间隔进行了操控,以测试前摄干扰如何随时间流逝而变化。与一项针对鸽子的类似研究相反,这些时间操控对猴子的前摄干扰没有明显影响,前摄干扰函数完全重叠,没有统计学差异或交互作用。这些结果表明,干扰严格基于中间事件的数量(使用其他图片的试验次数),而与时间流逝无关。用一组新的1024张图片进行重新测试,进一步支持了猴子明显基于事件的干扰。提前1次或2次试验出现的新图片产生的前摄干扰大于熟悉图片(一组熟悉的1024张图片)产生的前摄干扰。此外,当潜在干扰性新刺激提前16次试验出现时,表现准确性实际上高于基线试验(无干扰)时的准确性,这表明记住提前16次试验的刺激是一个线索,表明该刺激不是当前试验中的样本刺激——这是一个有些令人惊讶的结论,尤其是考虑到猴子的情况。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验