Wright Anthony A, Kelly Debbie M, Katz Jeffrey S
Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin Street, Room 7.174, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Learn Behav. 2018 Jun;46(2):107-123. doi: 10.3758/s13420-018-0316-3.
This article describes an approach for training a variety of species to learn the abstract concept of same/different, which in turn forms the basis for testing proactive interference and list memory. The stimulus set for concept-learning training was progressively doubled from 8, 16, 32, 64, 128 . . . to 1,024 different pictures with novel-stimulus transfer following learning. All species fully learned the same/different abstract concept: capuchin and rhesus monkeys learned more readily than pigeons; nutcrackers and magpies were at least equivalent to monkeys and transferred somewhat better following initial training sets. A similar task using the 1,024-picture set plus delays was used to test proactive interference on occasional trials. Pigeons revealed greater interference with 10-s than with 1-s delays, whereas delay time had no effect on rhesus monkeys, suggesting that the monkeys' interference was event based. This same single-item same/different task was expanded to a 4-item list memory task to test animal list memory. Humans were tested similarly with lists of kaleidoscope pictures. Delays between the list and test were manipulated, resulting in strong initial recency effects (i.e., strong 4th-item memory) at short delays and changing to a strong primacy effect (i.e., strong 1st-item memory) at long delays (pigeons 0-s to 10-s delays; monkeys 0-s to 30-s delays; humans 0-s to 100-s delays). Results and findings are discussed in terms of these species' cognition and memory comparisons, evolutionary implications, and future directions for testing other species in these synergistically related tasks.
本文描述了一种训练多种物种学习相同/不同抽象概念的方法,这反过来又构成了测试前摄干扰和列表记忆的基础。概念学习训练的刺激集从8、16、32、64、128……逐步翻倍至1024张不同的图片,并在学习后进行新刺激转移。所有物种都完全学会了相同/不同的抽象概念:卷尾猴和恒河猴比鸽子学得更容易;坚果雀和喜鹊至少与猴子相当,并且在初始训练集之后转移得更好。使用1024张图片集加上延迟的类似任务用于在偶尔的试验中测试前摄干扰。鸽子在延迟10秒时比延迟1秒时表现出更大的干扰,而延迟时间对恒河猴没有影响,这表明猴子的干扰是基于事件的。这个相同的单项相同/不同任务被扩展为一个4项列表记忆任务来测试动物的列表记忆。人类用万花筒图片列表进行了类似的测试。操纵列表和测试之间的延迟,在短延迟时会产生强烈的初始近因效应(即对第4项的强烈记忆),而在长延迟时会转变为强烈的首因效应(即对第项的强烈记忆)(鸽子延迟0秒至10秒;猴子延迟0秒至30秒;人类延迟0秒至100秒)。根据这些物种的认知和记忆比较、进化意义以及在这些协同相关任务中测试其他物种的未来方向,对结果和发现进行了讨论。