• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于伊朗电子健康记录系统(EHRS)坐标的SEPAS国家项目评估

The Evaluation of SEPAS National Project Based on Electronic Health Record System (EHRS) Coordinates in Iran.

作者信息

Asadi Farkhondeh, Moghaddasi Hamid, Rabiei Reza, Rahimi Forough, Mirshekarlou Soheila Jahangiri

机构信息

School of Allied Medical Sciences Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

School of allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, ShahidBeheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Deputy of Treatment, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran.

出版信息

Acta Inform Med. 2015 Dec;23(6):369-73. doi: 10.5455/aim.2015.23.369-373.

DOI:10.5455/aim.2015.23.369-373
PMID:26862248
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4720822/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Electronic Health Records (EHRs) are secure private lifetime records that can be shared by using interoperability standards between different organizations and units. These records are created by the productive system that is called EHR system. Implementing EHR systems has a number of advantages such as facilitating access to medical records, supporting patient care, and improving the quality of care and health care decisions. The project of electronic health record system in Iran, which is the goal of this study, is called SEPAS. With respect to the importance of EHR and EHR systems the researchers investigated the project from two perspectives: determining the coordinates of the project and how it evolved, and incorporating the coordinates of EHR system in this project.

METHODS

In this study two evaluation tools, a checklist and a questionnaire, were developed based on texts and reliable documentation. The questionnaire and the checklist were validated using content validity by receiving the experts' comments and the questionnaire's reliability was estimated through Test-retest(r =87%). Data were collected through study, observation, and interviews with experts and specialists of SEPAS project.

RESULTS

This research showed that SEPAS project, like any other project, could be evaluated. It has some aims; steps, operational phases and certain start and end time, but all the resources and required facilities for the project have not been considered. Therefore it could not satisfy its specified objective and the useful and unique changes which are the other characteristics of any project have not been achieved. In addition, the findings of EHR system coordinates can be determined in 4 categories as Standards and rules, Telecommunication-Communication facilities, Computer equipment and facilities and Stakeholders.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings indicated that SEPAS has the ability to use all standards of medical terminology and health classification systems in the case of Maksa approval (The reference health coding of Iran). ISO13606 was used as the main standard in this project. Regarding the telecommunication-communication facilities of the project, the findings showed that its link is restricted to health care centers which does not cover other institutions and organizations involved in public health. The final result showed that SEPAS is in the early stages of execution. And the full implementation of EHR needs the provision of the infrastructure of the National Health Information Network that is the same as EHR system.

摘要

背景

电子健康记录(EHRs)是安全的个人终身记录,可通过不同组织和单位之间的互操作性标准进行共享。这些记录由称为电子健康记录系统的生产系统创建。实施电子健康记录系统具有诸多优势,如便于获取医疗记录、支持患者护理以及提高护理质量和医疗决策水平。伊朗的电子健康记录系统项目,即本研究的目标,称为SEPAS。鉴于电子健康记录和电子健康记录系统的重要性,研究人员从两个角度对该项目进行了调查:确定项目的坐标及其发展方式,以及将电子健康记录系统的坐标纳入该项目。

方法

在本研究中,基于文本和可靠文档开发了两种评估工具,即检查表和问卷。通过征求专家意见,利用内容效度对问卷和检查表进行了验证,并通过重测法估计问卷的信度(r = 87%)。通过研究、观察以及与SEPAS项目的专家和专业人员进行访谈来收集数据。

结果

本研究表明,SEPAS项目与其他任何项目一样,可以进行评估。它有一些目标、步骤、运营阶段以及特定的开始和结束时间,但该项目并未考虑所有资源和所需设施。因此,它无法实现其规定的目标,也未实现任何项目的其他特征,即有用且独特的变革。此外,电子健康记录系统的坐标结果可分为4类,即标准与规则、电信通信设施、计算机设备与设施以及利益相关者。

结论

研究结果表明,SEPAS有能力在获得Maksa批准(伊朗的参考健康编码)的情况下使用所有医学术语和健康分类系统标准。本项目采用ISO13606作为主要标准。关于该项目的电信通信设施,研究结果表明其链接仅限于医疗保健中心,未涵盖参与公共卫生的其他机构和组织。最终结果表明,SEPAS处于实施的早期阶段。电子健康记录的全面实施需要提供与电子健康记录系统相同的国家健康信息网络基础设施。

相似文献

1
The Evaluation of SEPAS National Project Based on Electronic Health Record System (EHRS) Coordinates in Iran.基于伊朗电子健康记录系统(EHRS)坐标的SEPAS国家项目评估
Acta Inform Med. 2015 Dec;23(6):369-73. doi: 10.5455/aim.2015.23.369-373.
2
Evaluating the success of Iran Electronic Health Record System (SEPAS) based on the DeLone and McLean model: a cross-sectional descriptive study.基于德朗和麦克林模型评估伊朗电子健康记录系统(SEPAS)的成功:一项横断面描述性研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Jan 17;23(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02100-y.
3
Electronic Health Records Data and Metadata: Challenges for Big Data in the United States.电子健康记录数据和元数据:美国大数据面临的挑战。
Big Data. 2013 Dec;1(4):245-51. doi: 10.1089/big.2013.0023. Epub 2013 Dec 14.
4
Electronic Health Record Challenges, Workarounds, and Solutions Observed in Practices Integrating Behavioral Health and Primary Care.在整合行为健康与初级保健的实践中观察到的电子健康记录挑战、变通方法及解决方案
J Am Board Fam Med. 2015 Sep-Oct;28 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S63-72. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2015.S1.150133.
5
Implementation of Patient Engagement Tools in Electronic Health Records to Enhance Patient-Centered Communication: Protocol for Feasibility Evaluation and Preliminary Results.在电子健康记录中实施患者参与工具以加强以患者为中心的沟通:可行性评估方案及初步结果
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Aug 26;10(8):e30431. doi: 10.2196/30431.
6
Definition, structure, content, use and impacts of electronic health records: a review of the research literature.电子健康记录的定义、结构、内容、用途及影响:研究文献综述
Int J Med Inform. 2008 May;77(5):291-304. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.09.001. Epub 2007 Oct 22.
7
Type and Number of Errors of the Iranian Electronic Health Record (SEPAS) in Hospitals Affiliated with Mashhad University of Medical Sciences.伊朗电子健康记录(SEPAS)在马什哈德医科大学附属医院中的类型和错误数量。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2022 Jun 29;295:354-357. doi: 10.3233/SHTI220736.
8
Information Models Offer Value to Standardize Electronic Health Record Flowsheet Data: A Fall Prevention Exemplar.信息模型为标准化电子健康记录流程表数据提供价值:一个预防跌倒的示例。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2021 May;53(3):306-314. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12646. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
9
Evaluating the demographic and clinical minimum data sets of Iranian National Electronic Health Record.评估伊朗国家电子健康记录的人口统计学和临床最小数据集。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jul 4;19(1):450. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4284-x.
10
Safety Assurance Factors for Electronic Health Record Resilience (SAFER): study protocol.电子健康记录弹性的安全保障因素(SAFER)研究方案。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013 Apr 12;13:46. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-46.

引用本文的文献

1
COVID-19 burden in Iran: disability-adjusted life years analysis from hospital data, 2020-2021.伊朗的新冠疫情负担:基于2020 - 2021年医院数据的伤残调整生命年分析
Arch Public Health. 2024 Aug 26;82(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s13690-024-01355-9.
2
Evaluating the success of Iran Electronic Health Record System (SEPAS) based on the DeLone and McLean model: a cross-sectional descriptive study.基于德朗和麦克林模型评估伊朗电子健康记录系统(SEPAS)的成功:一项横断面描述性研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Jan 17;23(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02100-y.
3
Medical Informatics in Iran and the Emergence of Clinical Informatics.伊朗的医学信息学与临床信息学的兴起。
Iran J Med Sci. 2022 Nov;47(6):503-504. doi: 10.30476/ijms.2022.48773.
4
Notifiable diseases interoperable framework toward improving Iran public health surveillance system: Lessons learned from COVID-19 pandemic.改善伊朗公共卫生监测系统的法定传染病互操作性框架:从 COVID-19 大流行中吸取的教训
J Educ Health Promot. 2021 May 31;10(1):179. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1082_20. eCollection 2021.
5
Determining the Hospital Information System (HIS) Success Rate: Development of a New Instrument and Case Study.确定医院信息系统(HIS)的成功率:一种新工具的开发及案例研究。
Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019 May 14;7(9):1407-1414. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2019.294. eCollection 2019 May 15.
6
Usability Evaluation of an Admission, Discharge, and Transfer Information System: A Heuristic Evaluation.入院、出院及转院信息系统的可用性评估:启发式评估
Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2018 Nov 10;6(11):1941-1945. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2018.392. eCollection 2018 Nov 25.
7
National Minimum Data Set for Antimicrobial Resistance Management: Toward Global Surveillance System.抗菌药物耐药性管理国家最低数据集:迈向全球监测系统
Iran J Med Sci. 2018 Sep;43(5):494-505.

本文引用的文献

1
Development of fundamental infrastructure for nationwide EHR in Japan.日本全国电子健康记录基础架构的发展。
J Med Syst. 2012 Aug;36(4):2213-8. doi: 10.1007/s10916-011-9688-z. Epub 2011 Apr 1.
2
An analysis framework for electronic health record systems. Interoperation and collaboration in shared healthcare.电子健康记录系统的分析框架。共享医疗中的互操作性与协作。
Methods Inf Med. 2011;50(2):180-9. doi: 10.3414/ME09-01-0002. Epub 2009 Nov 20.
3
Definition, structure, content, use and impacts of electronic health records: a review of the research literature.电子健康记录的定义、结构、内容、用途及影响:研究文献综述
Int J Med Inform. 2008 May;77(5):291-304. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.09.001. Epub 2007 Oct 22.
4
Using electronic health records to help coordinate care.利用电子健康记录来协助协调医疗服务。
Milbank Q. 2004;82(3):457-81, table of contents. doi: 10.1111/j.0887-378X.2004.00318.x.