Collen D, Gold H K
Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg. 1989;51(3):191-228; discussion 229.
Thrombotic complications of cardiovascular disease are a main cause of death and disability and, consequently, thrombolytic therapy with plasminogen activators could favorably influence the outcome of such life-threatening diseases as acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Five thrombolytic agents are either available or under clinical investigation: streptokinase (SK), urokinase (UK), recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA), anisoylated plasminogen streptokinase activator complex (APSAC) and single chain urokinase-type plasminogen activator (scu-PA, pro-urokinase). The first generation thrombolytic agents, SK (and probably also UK), are only moderately efficacious; rt-PA is a more effective and fibrin-specific thrombolytic than SK; APSAC has a thrombolytic efficacy and fibrin-specificity that is probably similar or somewhat superior to that of SK and can be administered by bolus injection; scu-PA is more fibrin-specific than UK but it is only in the early stage of clinical investigation. Reduction of infarct size, preservation of ventricular function and/or reduction in mortality has been observed with SK, rt-PA and APSAC, but comparative trials with mortality endpoints are not yet available. Intravenous SK recanalizes 40-45 percent of occluded coronary arteries in patients with AMI and reduces mortality by 25 percent. rt-PA produces both more rapid and more frequent (65-70 percent) reperfusion. The choice of agent for the treatment of AMI at present must be based on considerations of lower cost of streptokinase versus higher efficacy for coronary recanalization of rt-PA. All available thrombolytic agents suffer shortcomings, including submaximal efficacy, limited fibrin-specificity and bleeding side effects. New developments towards improved efficacy and fibrin-specificity include combinations of synergistic thrombolytic agents, mutants of t-PA or scu-PA, chimeric t-PA/scu-PA molecules, antibody-targeted thrombolytic agents, and/or combinations of fibrin-dissolving agents with anti-platelet strategies.
心血管疾病的血栓并发症是死亡和残疾的主要原因,因此,用纤溶酶原激活剂进行溶栓治疗可能会对急性心肌梗死(AMI)等危及生命的疾病的治疗结果产生有利影响。有五种溶栓剂可供使用或正在进行临床研究:链激酶(SK)、尿激酶(UK)、重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(rt-PA)、茴香酰化纤溶酶原链激酶激活剂复合物(APSAC)和单链尿激酶型纤溶酶原激活剂(scu-PA,尿激酶原)。第一代溶栓剂,SK(可能还有UK),疗效一般;rt-PA是一种比SK更有效且对纤维蛋白更具特异性的溶栓剂;APSAC的溶栓疗效和纤维蛋白特异性可能与SK相似或略优于SK,且可通过大剂量注射给药;scu-PA比UK对纤维蛋白更具特异性,但它仅处于临床研究的早期阶段。已观察到SK、rt-PA和APSAC可缩小梗死面积、保留心室功能和/或降低死亡率,但尚无关于死亡率终点的对比试验。静脉注射SK可使AMI患者中40%-45%的闭塞冠状动脉再通,并使死亡率降低25%。rt-PA能实现更快且更频繁(65%-70%)的再灌注。目前治疗AMI药物的选择必须基于链激酶成本较低与rt-PA冠状动脉再通疗效较高的考虑。所有可用的溶栓剂都有缺点,包括疗效欠佳、纤维蛋白特异性有限和出血副作用。在提高疗效和纤维蛋白特异性方面的新进展包括协同溶栓剂的联合、t-PA或scu-PA的突变体、嵌合t-PA/scu-PA分子、抗体靶向溶栓剂,和/或纤溶药物与抗血小板策略的联合。