Collen D, Gold H K
Center for Thrombosis and Vascular Research, University of Leuven, Belgium.
Adv Exp Med Biol. 1990;281:333-54.
Thrombotic complications of cardiovascular disease are a main cause of death and disability and, consequently, thrombolysis could favorably influence the outcome of such life-threatening diseases as myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular thrombosis and venous thromboembolism. Thrombolytic agents are plasminogen activators that convert plasminogen, the inactive proenzyme of the fibrinolytic system in blood, to the proteolytic enzyme plasmin. Plasmin dissolves the fibrin of a blood clot, but may also degrade normal components of the hemostatic system and predispose to bleeding. Currently, five thrombolytic agents are either approved for clinical use or under clinical investigation in patients with acute myocardial infarction. These include streptokinase, urokinase, recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA), anisoylated plasminogen streptokinase activator complex (APSAC) and single chain urokinase-type plasminogen activator (scu-PA, prourokinase). The first generation thrombolytic agents, streptokinase (and probably also urokinase), are only moderately efficacious and their administration is associated with extensive systemic fibrinogen breakdown. In comparative studies performed in patients with acute myocardial infarction, recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA) is a more effective and fibrin-specific thrombolytic agent than streptokinase. The acylated plasminogen streptokinase activator complex (APSAC) has a profile of thrombolytic efficacy and fibrin-specificity that is similar or somewhat better than that of streptokinase, but has the advantage that it can be administered by bolus injection. Single chain urokinase-type plasminogen activator is more fibrin-specific than urokinase. Comparative data on the efficacy and safety of this agent are limited as it is in the early stage of clinical investigation. Reduction of infarct size, preservation of ventricular function and/or reduction in mortality has been observed with streptokinase, rt-PA and APSAC. Therefore, thrombolytic therapy will probably become routine therapy for early acute myocardial infarction. In patients with acute myocardial infarction, intravenous streptokinase recanalizes 40-45 percent of occluded coronary arteries and reduces mortality by 25 percent; it costs approximately $200 for a therapeutic dose of 1,500,000 units. Recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA) is more potent for coronary arterial thrombolysis, producing both more rapid and more frequent (65-70 percent) reperfusion, but it costs over $1,000 for a therapeutic dose of 100 mg. Side effects (mainly bleeding) and the incidence of reocclusion associated with the use of streptokinase and rt-PA are not markedly different. Whether the higher efficacy of rt-PA will translate into a comparably larger reduction of mortality remains to be determined in large comparative clinical trials.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
心血管疾病的血栓形成并发症是死亡和残疾的主要原因,因此,溶栓治疗可能会对诸如心肌梗死、脑血管血栓形成和静脉血栓栓塞等危及生命的疾病的治疗结果产生积极影响。溶栓剂是纤溶酶原激活剂,可将血液中纤维蛋白溶解系统的无活性前体酶纤溶酶原转化为蛋白水解酶纤溶酶。纤溶酶可溶解血凝块中的纤维蛋白,但也可能降解止血系统的正常成分并导致出血倾向。目前,有五种溶栓剂已被批准用于临床或正在对急性心肌梗死患者进行临床研究。这些包括链激酶、尿激酶、重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(rt-PA)、茴香酰化纤溶酶原链激酶激活剂复合物(APSAC)和单链尿激酶型纤溶酶原激活剂(scu-PA,尿激酶原)。第一代溶栓剂,链激酶(可能还有尿激酶),疗效一般,其使用会导致广泛的全身性纤维蛋白原分解。在对急性心肌梗死患者进行的比较研究中,重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(rt-PA)是一种比链激酶更有效且纤维蛋白特异性更强的溶栓剂。酰化纤溶酶原链激酶激活剂复合物(APSAC)的溶栓疗效和纤维蛋白特异性与链激酶相似或略好,但具有可通过静脉推注给药的优点。单链尿激酶型纤溶酶原激活剂比尿激酶具有更强的纤维蛋白特异性。由于该药物尚处于临床研究早期阶段,关于其疗效和安全性的比较数据有限。使用链激酶、rt-PA和APSAC已观察到梗死面积缩小、心室功能保留和/或死亡率降低。因此,溶栓治疗可能会成为早期急性心肌梗死的常规治疗方法。在急性心肌梗死患者中,静脉注射链激酶可使40%-45%的闭塞冠状动脉再通,并使死亡率降低25%;150万单位的治疗剂量成本约为200美元。重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(rt-PA)对冠状动脉血栓溶解作用更强,能实现更快且更频繁(65%-70%)的再灌注,但100mg的治疗剂量成本超过1000美元。使用链激酶和rt-PA的副作用(主要是出血)和再闭塞发生率没有明显差异。rt-PA更高的疗效是否会转化为死亡率的相应更大幅度降低,仍有待大型比较临床试验确定。(摘要截选至400字)