Saltman Richard B, Teperi Juha
1Professor of Health Policy and Management,Rollins School of Public Health,Atlanta,USA.
2Dean,School of Health Sciences,University of Tampere,Tampere,Finland.
Health Econ Policy Law. 2016 Jul;11(3):303-19. doi: 10.1017/S1744133116000013. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
The Finnish health care system is widely respected for its pilot role in creating primary-care-led health systems. In the early 1990s, however, a severe economic downturn in Finland reduced public funding and weakened the Finnish system's deeply decentralized model of health care administration. Recent Bank of Finland projections forecasting several decades of slow economic growth, combined with the impact of an aging population, appear to make major reform of the existing public system inevitable. Over the last several years, political attention has focused mostly on administrative consolidation inside the public sector, particularly integration of health and social services. Current proposals call for a reformed health sector governance structure based on a new meso-level configuration of public administration. In addition, Finland's national government has proposed replacing the current multi-channel public funding structure (which includes health insurance subsidies for occupational health services) with a single-channel public funding structure. This commentary examines several key issues involved in reforming the delivery structure of the Finnish health care system. It also explores possible alternative strategies to reform current funding arrangements. The article concludes with a brief discussion of implications from this Finnish experience for the wider health reform debate.
芬兰的医疗体系因其在创建以初级保健为主导的医疗体系方面所发挥的试点作用而广受赞誉。然而,在20世纪90年代初,芬兰的严重经济衰退减少了公共资金,并削弱了芬兰医疗体系高度分散的医疗管理模式。芬兰银行最近预测经济将经历几十年的缓慢增长,再加上人口老龄化的影响,现有公共体系的重大改革似乎不可避免。在过去几年里,政治关注主要集中在公共部门内部的行政整合上,尤其是卫生与社会服务的整合。目前的提议要求基于公共行政的新中观层面配置建立一个经过改革的医疗部门治理结构。此外,芬兰国家政府提议用单一渠道的公共资金结构取代当前多渠道的公共资金结构(其中包括职业健康服务的健康保险补贴)。本评论探讨了芬兰医疗体系改革交付结构中涉及的几个关键问题。它还探讨了改革当前资金安排的可能替代策略。文章最后简要讨论了芬兰这一经验对更广泛的医疗改革辩论的启示。