Professor of Health Policy and Management,Rollins School of Public Health,Emory University,Atlanta,GA,USA.
Health Econ Policy Law. 2018 Jul;13(3-4):382-405. doi: 10.1017/S1744133117000445. Epub 2018 Jan 24.
This paper assesses recent health sector reform strategies across Europe adopted since the onset of the 2008 financial crisis. It begins with a brief overview of the continued economic pressure on public funding for health care services, particularly in tax-funded Northern European health care systems. While economic growth rates across Europe have risen a bit in the last year, they remain below the level necessary to provide the needed expansion of public health sector revenues. This continued public revenue shortage has become the central challenge that policymakers in these health systems confront, and increasingly constrains their potential range of policy options. The paper then examines the types of targeted reforms that various European governments have introduced in response to this increased fiscal stringency. Particularly in tax-funded health systems, these efforts have been focused on two types of changes on the production side of their health systems: consolidating and/or centralizing administrative authority over public hospitals, and revamping secondary and primary health services as well as social services to reduce the volume, cost and less-than-optimal outcomes of existing public elderly care programs. While revamping elderly care services also was pursued in the social health insurance (SHI) system in the Netherlands, both the Dutch and the German health systems also made important changes on the financing side of their health systems. Both types of targeted reforms are illustrated through short country case studies. Each of these country assessments flags up new mechanisms that have been introduced and which potentially could be reshaped and applied in other national health sector contexts. Reflecting the tax-funded structure of the Canadian health system, the preponderance of cases discussed focus on tax-funded countries (Norway, Denmark, Sweden, Finland, England, Ireland), with additional brief assessments of recent changes in the SHI-funded health systems in the Netherlands and Germany. The paper concludes that post-2008 European reforms have helped stretch existing public funds more effectively, but seem unlikely to resolve the core problem of inadequate overall public funding, particularly in tax-based health systems. This observation suggests that ongoing Canadian efforts to consolidate and better integrate its health care providers, while important, may not eliminate long-term health sector-funding dilemmas.
本文评估了自 2008 年金融危机以来欧洲各国最近采取的卫生部门改革战略。本文首先简要概述了公共卫生服务资金持续面临的经济压力,尤其是在北欧税收资助型医疗体系中。尽管过去一年欧洲的经济增长率略有上升,但仍低于提供公共卫生部门收入所需的增长水平。这种持续的公共收入短缺已成为这些卫生体系中政策制定者面临的核心挑战,并日益限制了他们潜在的政策选择范围。本文接着研究了各国政府为应对这种财政紧缩而采取的有针对性的改革类型。特别是在税收资助的医疗体系中,这些努力主要集中在医疗体系生产方面的两类改革:整合和/或集中对公立医院的行政权力,以及改革二级和初级卫生服务以及社会服务,以减少现有公共老年人护理计划的数量、成本和不尽如人意的结果。虽然荷兰的社会健康保险(SHI)体系也在努力改革老年人护理服务,但荷兰和德国的卫生体系也在其卫生体系的融资方面进行了重要改革。通过简短的国家案例研究说明了这两种有针对性的改革类型。每个国家的评估都提出了已经引入的新机制,这些机制可能会在其他国家的卫生部门背景下进行重塑和应用。考虑到加拿大卫生系统的税收资助结构,所讨论的案例绝大多数集中在税收资助型国家(挪威、丹麦、瑞典、芬兰、英国、爱尔兰),并简要评估了荷兰和德国 SHI 资助的卫生系统最近的变化。本文得出结论,2008 年后的欧洲改革有助于更有效地利用现有公共资金,但似乎不太可能解决公共资金总体不足的核心问题,尤其是在税收型卫生体系中。这一观察结果表明,加拿大正在进行的整合和更好地整合其医疗服务提供者的努力虽然重要,但可能无法消除长期的卫生部门资金困境。