• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经济增长缓慢对卫生部门改革的影响:跨国视角。

The impact of slow economic growth on health sector reform: a cross-national perspective.

机构信息

Professor of Health Policy and Management,Rollins School of Public Health,Emory University,Atlanta,GA,USA.

出版信息

Health Econ Policy Law. 2018 Jul;13(3-4):382-405. doi: 10.1017/S1744133117000445. Epub 2018 Jan 24.

DOI:10.1017/S1744133117000445
PMID:29362008
Abstract

This paper assesses recent health sector reform strategies across Europe adopted since the onset of the 2008 financial crisis. It begins with a brief overview of the continued economic pressure on public funding for health care services, particularly in tax-funded Northern European health care systems. While economic growth rates across Europe have risen a bit in the last year, they remain below the level necessary to provide the needed expansion of public health sector revenues. This continued public revenue shortage has become the central challenge that policymakers in these health systems confront, and increasingly constrains their potential range of policy options. The paper then examines the types of targeted reforms that various European governments have introduced in response to this increased fiscal stringency. Particularly in tax-funded health systems, these efforts have been focused on two types of changes on the production side of their health systems: consolidating and/or centralizing administrative authority over public hospitals, and revamping secondary and primary health services as well as social services to reduce the volume, cost and less-than-optimal outcomes of existing public elderly care programs. While revamping elderly care services also was pursued in the social health insurance (SHI) system in the Netherlands, both the Dutch and the German health systems also made important changes on the financing side of their health systems. Both types of targeted reforms are illustrated through short country case studies. Each of these country assessments flags up new mechanisms that have been introduced and which potentially could be reshaped and applied in other national health sector contexts. Reflecting the tax-funded structure of the Canadian health system, the preponderance of cases discussed focus on tax-funded countries (Norway, Denmark, Sweden, Finland, England, Ireland), with additional brief assessments of recent changes in the SHI-funded health systems in the Netherlands and Germany. The paper concludes that post-2008 European reforms have helped stretch existing public funds more effectively, but seem unlikely to resolve the core problem of inadequate overall public funding, particularly in tax-based health systems. This observation suggests that ongoing Canadian efforts to consolidate and better integrate its health care providers, while important, may not eliminate long-term health sector-funding dilemmas.

摘要

本文评估了自 2008 年金融危机以来欧洲各国最近采取的卫生部门改革战略。本文首先简要概述了公共卫生服务资金持续面临的经济压力,尤其是在北欧税收资助型医疗体系中。尽管过去一年欧洲的经济增长率略有上升,但仍低于提供公共卫生部门收入所需的增长水平。这种持续的公共收入短缺已成为这些卫生体系中政策制定者面临的核心挑战,并日益限制了他们潜在的政策选择范围。本文接着研究了各国政府为应对这种财政紧缩而采取的有针对性的改革类型。特别是在税收资助的医疗体系中,这些努力主要集中在医疗体系生产方面的两类改革:整合和/或集中对公立医院的行政权力,以及改革二级和初级卫生服务以及社会服务,以减少现有公共老年人护理计划的数量、成本和不尽如人意的结果。虽然荷兰的社会健康保险(SHI)体系也在努力改革老年人护理服务,但荷兰和德国的卫生体系也在其卫生体系的融资方面进行了重要改革。通过简短的国家案例研究说明了这两种有针对性的改革类型。每个国家的评估都提出了已经引入的新机制,这些机制可能会在其他国家的卫生部门背景下进行重塑和应用。考虑到加拿大卫生系统的税收资助结构,所讨论的案例绝大多数集中在税收资助型国家(挪威、丹麦、瑞典、芬兰、英国、爱尔兰),并简要评估了荷兰和德国 SHI 资助的卫生系统最近的变化。本文得出结论,2008 年后的欧洲改革有助于更有效地利用现有公共资金,但似乎不太可能解决公共资金总体不足的核心问题,尤其是在税收型卫生体系中。这一观察结果表明,加拿大正在进行的整合和更好地整合其医疗服务提供者的努力虽然重要,但可能无法消除长期的卫生部门资金困境。

相似文献

1
The impact of slow economic growth on health sector reform: a cross-national perspective.经济增长缓慢对卫生部门改革的影响:跨国视角。
Health Econ Policy Law. 2018 Jul;13(3-4):382-405. doi: 10.1017/S1744133117000445. Epub 2018 Jan 24.
2
The cost of free health care for all Kenyans: assessing the financial sustainability of contributory and non-contributory financing mechanisms.为所有肯尼亚人提供免费医疗保健的成本:评估缴费型和非缴费型融资机制的财务可持续性。
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Feb 27;16(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0535-9.
3
Managing the health care market in developing countries: prospects and problems.发展中国家医疗保健市场的管理:前景与问题
Health Policy Plan. 1994 Sep;9(3):237-51. doi: 10.1093/heapol/9.3.237.
4
Can Asia provide models for tax-based European health systems? A comparative study of Singapore and Sweden.亚洲能否为欧洲税收型医疗体系提供借鉴?以新加坡和瑞典为例的比较研究。
Health Econ Policy Law. 2022 Apr;17(2):157-174. doi: 10.1017/S1744133120000390. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
5
Sustainability of Long-term Care: Puzzling Tasks Ahead for Policy-Makers.长期护理的可持续性:政策制定者面临的棘手任务。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 Apr 1;6(4):195-205. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.109.
6
Modelling the affordability and distributional implications of future health care financing options in South Africa.模拟南非未来医疗保健融资选择的负担能力和分配影响。
Health Policy Plan. 2012 Mar;27 Suppl 1:i101-12. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czs003.
7
Local public hospitals: changing with the times.当地公立医院:与时俱进。
Res Brief. 2012 Nov(25):1-13.
8
Reforms in the Greek pharmaceutical market during the financial crisis.希腊金融危机期间的医药市场改革。
Health Policy. 2013 Jan;109(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.08.016. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
9
Healthcare reforms in Cyprus 2013-2017: Does the crisis mark the end of the healthcare sector as we know it?塞浦路斯 2013-2017 年的医疗改革:危机是否标志着我们所知道的医疗保健行业的终结?
Health Policy. 2018 Feb;122(2):75-80. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.11.004. Epub 2017 Nov 11.
10
Recovering lost tax to meet the health financing gap for universal public sector health systems in East and Southern Africa.弥补税收流失,以满足东非和南非全民公立部门卫生系统的卫生筹资缺口。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Oct;8(Suppl 8). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-011820.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis for health system resilience against the economic crisis: a best-fit framework synthesis.卫生系统应对经济危机的恢复力分析:最佳适配框架综合分析
Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 Mar 14;23(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12961-025-01285-0.
2
Research on the impact of artificial intelligence technology on urban public health resilience.人工智能技术对城市公共卫生韧性的影响研究。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jan 7;12:1506930. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1506930. eCollection 2024.
3
In-Between Policy Vision and Practical Realities of Primary Healthcare: A Case Study in Rural Northern Sweden.
基层医疗保健政策愿景与现实之间:瑞典北部农村的案例研究
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2024;13:8372. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.8372. Epub 2024 Nov 18.
4
Modeling European health systems: a theoretical exercise.构建欧洲卫生系统模型:一项理论实践。
Eur J Health Econ. 2023 Nov;24(8):1249-1252. doi: 10.1007/s10198-023-01628-0. Epub 2023 Sep 4.
5
Including mental health care in a model of European health system.将精神卫生保健纳入欧洲卫生系统模式。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2023 Feb 20;32:e12. doi: 10.1017/S2045796023000057.
6
What factors influence community wound care in the UK? A focus group study using the Theoretical Domains Framework.英国有哪些因素影响社区伤口护理?使用理论领域框架的焦点小组研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 31;9(7):e024859. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024859.
7
Competition in health markets: is something rotten?健康市场中的竞争:是否存在问题?
J R Soc Med. 2019 Jan;112(1):6-10. doi: 10.1177/0141076818816935. Epub 2018 Dec 3.