Suppr超能文献

用于检测结核分枝杆菌的Epistem基因驱动检测法的分析与临床评估

Analytical and Clinical Evaluation of the Epistem Genedrive Assay for Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

作者信息

Shenai Shubhada, Armstrong Derek T, Valli Eloise, Dolinger David L, Nakiyingi Lydia, Dietze Reynaldo, Dalcolmo Margareth Pretti, Nicol Mark P, Zemanay Widaad, Manabe Yuka, Hadad David Jamil, Marques-Rodrigues Patricia, Palaci Moises, Peres Renata L, Gaeddert Mary, Armakovitch Sandra, Nonyane Bareng A S, Denkinger Claudia M, Banada Padmapriya, Joloba Moses L, Ellner Jerrold, Boehme Catharina, Alland David, Dorman Susan E

机构信息

Division of Infectious Diseases, Center for Emerging Pathogens, Rutgers-New Jersey Medical School, Rutgers Biomedical & Health Sciences, Newark, New Jersey, USA.

Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 2016 Apr;54(4):1051-7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02847-15. Epub 2016 Feb 10.

Abstract

The Epistem Genedrive assay rapidly detects the Mycobacterium tuberculosis omplex from sputum and is currently available for clinical use. However, the analytical and clinical performance of this test has not been fully evaluated. The analytical limit of detection (LOD) of the Genedrive PCR amplification was tested with genomic DNA; the performance of the complete (sample processing plus amplification) system was tested by spiking M. tuberculosismc(2)6030 cells into distilled water andM. tuberculosis-negative sputum. Specificity was tested using common respiratory pathogens and nontuberculosis mycobacteria. A clinical evaluation enrolled adults with suspected pulmonary tuberculosis, obtained three sputum samples from each participant, and compared the accuracy of the Gene drive to that of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay using M. tuberculosiscultures as the reference standard. The Genedrive assay had an LOD of 1 pg/μl (100 genomic DNA copies/reaction). The LODs of the system were 2.5 × 10(4)CFU/ml and 2.5 × 10(5)CFU/ml for cells spiked into water and sputum, respectively. False-positiverpoBprobe signals were observed in 3/32 (9.4%) of the negative controls and also in few samples containing Mycobacterium abscessus,Mycobacterium gordonae, o rMycobacterium thermoresistibile In the clinical study, among 336 analyzed participants, the overall sensitivities for the tuberculosis case detection of Gene drive, Xpert, and smear microscopy were 45.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 35.2% to 55.8%), 91.8% (95% CI, 84.4% to 96.4%), and 77.3% (95% CI, 67.7% to 85.2%), respectively. The sensitivities of Gene drive and Xpert for the detection of smear-microscopy-negative tuberculosis were 0% (95% CI, 0% to 15.4%) and 68.2% (95% CI, 45.1% to 86.1%), respectively. The Genedrive assay did not meet performance standards recommended by the World Health Organization for a smear microscopy replacement tuberculosis test. Epistem is working on modifications to improve the assay.

摘要

Epistem基因驱动检测法可快速从痰液中检测出结核分枝杆菌复合群,目前已可供临床使用。然而,该检测方法的分析性能和临床性能尚未得到充分评估。使用基因组DNA对基因驱动聚合酶链反应(PCR)扩增的分析检测限(LOD)进行了测试;通过将结核分枝杆菌mc(2)6030细胞加入蒸馏水和结核分枝杆菌阴性痰液中来测试完整(样本处理加扩增)系统的性能。使用常见呼吸道病原体和非结核分枝杆菌测试了特异性。一项临床评估纳入了疑似肺结核的成年人,从每位参与者处获取三份痰液样本,并以结核分枝杆菌培养物作为参考标准,将基因驱动检测法的准确性与Xpert MTB/RIF检测法的准确性进行比较。基因驱动检测法的LOD为1 pg/μl(100个基因组DNA拷贝/反应)。对于加入水中和痰液中的细胞,该系统的LOD分别为2.5×10(4)CFU/ml和2.5×10(5)CFU/ml。在32个阴性对照中的3个(9.4%)以及少数含有脓肿分枝杆菌、戈登分枝杆菌或耐热分枝杆菌的样本中观察到假阳性rpoB探针信号。在临床研究中,在336名接受分析的参与者中,基因驱动检测法、Xpert检测法和涂片显微镜检查法检测结核病病例的总体敏感性分别为45.4%(95%置信区间[CI],35.2%至55.8%)、91.8%(95%CI,84.4%至96.4%)和77.3%(95%CI,67.7%至85.2%)。基因驱动检测法和Xpert检测法检测涂片显微镜检查阴性结核病的敏感性分别为0%(95%CI,0%至15.4%)和68.2%(95%CI,45.1%至86.1%)。基因驱动检测法未达到世界卫生组织推荐的用于替代涂片显微镜检查的结核病检测性能标准。Epistem正在进行改进该检测法的修改工作。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

4
Tuberculosis.结核病
Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2006 Jul-Sep;100(5-6):415-31. doi: 10.1179/136485906X91477.
5
New disinfection and sterilization methods.新的消毒与灭菌方法。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2001 Mar-Apr;7(2):348-53. doi: 10.3201/eid0702.010241.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验