• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

引产的经济影响。

Economic implications of labor induction.

作者信息

Garcia-Simon Raquel, Montañes Antonio, Clemente Jesús, Del Pino María D, Romero Manuel A, Fabre Ernesto, Oros Daniel

机构信息

Obstetrics Department, Hospital Clínico Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Aragón, Zaragoza, Spain.

Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zaragoza, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016 Apr;133(1):112-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.08.022. Epub 2015 Dec 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.08.022
PMID:26868065
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess health service costs associated with labor induction according to different clinical situations in a tertiary-level hospital.

METHODS

In a prospective study, individual patient cost data were assessed for women admitted for induction of labor at a tertiary hospital in Spain between November 1, 2012, and August 31, 2013. The costs of labor induction were estimated according to maternal and neonatal outcomes, method of delivery, cervical condition at admission, and obstetric indication. Direct costs including professional fees, epidural, maternal stay, consumables, and drugs were calculated.

RESULTS

Overall, 412 women were included in the final cost analysis. The mean total cost of labor induction was €3589.87 (95% confidence interval [CI] 3475.13-3704.61). Cesarean delivery after labor induction (€4830.45, 95% CI 4623.13-5037.58) was significantly more expensive than spontaneous delivery (€3037.45, 95% CI 2966.91-3179.99) and instrumental vaginal delivery (€3344.31, 95%CI 3151.69-3536.93). The total cost for patients with a very unfavorable cervix (Bishop score <2; €4283.47, 95% CI 4063.06-4503.88) was almost double that for women with a favorable cervix (€2605.09, 95% CI 2327.38-2837.58). Labor induction for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy was the most expensive obstetric indication for induction of labor (€4347.32, 95% CI 3890.45-4804.18).

CONCLUSION

Following the induction of labor, a number of patient- and treatment-related factors influence costs associated with delivery.

摘要

目的

在一家三级医院中,根据不同临床情况评估与引产相关的医疗服务成本。

方法

在一项前瞻性研究中,对2012年11月1日至2013年8月31日期间在西班牙一家三级医院因引产入院的女性患者的个体成本数据进行评估。根据母婴结局、分娩方式、入院时宫颈状况和产科指征估算引产成本。计算包括专业费用、硬膜外麻醉、产妇住院时间、耗材和药物在内的直接成本。

结果

总体而言,412名女性被纳入最终成本分析。引产的平均总成本为3589.87欧元(95%置信区间[CI]3475.13 - 3704.61)。引产术后剖宫产(4830.45欧元,95%CI 4623.13 - 5037.58)明显比自然分娩(3037.45欧元,95%CI 2966.91 - 3179.99)和器械助产阴道分娩(3344.31欧元,95%CI 3151.69 - 3536.93)更昂贵。宫颈条件非常不利(Bishop评分<2;4283.47欧元,95%CI 4063.06 - 4503.88)的患者的总成本几乎是宫颈条件有利的女性(2605.09欧元,95%CI 2327.38 - 2837.58)的两倍。妊娠高血压疾病引产是引产最昂贵的产科指征(4347.32欧元,95%CI 3890.45 - 4804.18)。

结论

引产之后,一些与患者和治疗相关的因素会影响分娩相关成本。

相似文献

1
Economic implications of labor induction.引产的经济影响。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016 Apr;133(1):112-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.08.022. Epub 2015 Dec 18.
2
Predictors of perinatal outcomes and economic costs for late-term induction of labour.晚期引产围产期结局及经济成本的预测因素
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;56(3):286-290. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2017.04.004.
3
Economic implications of method of delivery.分娩方式的经济影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jul;193(1):192-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.10.635.
4
Induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation versus expectant management for low-risk nulliparous women: a cost-effectiveness analysis.39 孕周引产与期待治疗对低危初产妇的成本效益分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jun;220(6):590.e1-590.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.02.017. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
5
Cumulative economic implications of initial method of delivery.分娩初始方式的累积经济影响。
Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Sep;108(3 Pt 1):549-55. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000228511.42529.a5.
6
Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women.初产妇引产术后的 Bishop 评分与剖宫产风险
Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Apr;105(4):690-7. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000152338.76759.38.
7
Transvaginal sonography of the uterine cervix prior to labor induction.引产术前经阴道子宫颈超声检查。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Mar;19(3):254-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00643.x.
8
Transcervical Foley catheter with and without extraamniotic saline infusion for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.经宫颈 Foley 导管联合或不联合羊膜外生理盐水输注用于引产:一项随机对照试验
Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Sep;110(3):558-65. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000278077.30890.87.
9
Mode of delivery in pregnant women with hypertensive disorders and unfavorable cervix following induction of labor with vaginal application of prostaglandin E.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005 Jul;84(7):665-71. doi: 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00681.x.
10
Transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length vs. Bishop score in labor induction at term: tolerability and prediction of Cesarean delivery.足月引产时经阴道超声测量宫颈长度与Bishop评分的比较:耐受性及剖宫产预测
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007 May;29(5):568-73. doi: 10.1002/uog.4018.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of the Fruit and Seed of Date on Childbirth Stages and Pregnancy Complications.椰枣果实和种子对分娩阶段及妊娠并发症的影响。
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2024 Nov;24(4):483-490. doi: 10.18295/squmj.12.2023.094. Epub 2024 Nov 27.
2
Induction of Labor: A Narrative Review on Cost Efficiency in Maternity Care.引产:关于产科护理成本效益的叙述性综述
Cureus. 2024 Oct 12;16(10):e71302. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71302. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3
Associations of primiparous pre-pregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain with cesarean delivery after induction: a prospective cohort study.
初产妇孕前体重指数及孕期体重增加与引产术后剖宫产的相关性:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Aug 30;11:1453620. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1453620. eCollection 2024.
4
Prevalence, outcomes and associated factors of labor induction among women delivered at public hospitals of MEKELLE town-(a hospital based cross sectional study).梅克尔镇公立医院分娩产妇中引产的流行情况、结局及相关因素:一项基于医院的横断面研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Apr 9;20(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-02862-7.