Ogunwale Abayomi N, Morrison Alanna C, Sun Wensheng, Dodge Rhiannon C, Virani Salim S, Taylor Addison, Gottesman Rebecca F, Yang Eric, Wei Peng, McEvoy John W, Heiss Gerardo, Boerwinkle Eric, Ballantyne Christie M, Nambi Vijay
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Texas, USA.
Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016 Sep;23(14):1529-36. doi: 10.1177/2047487316633549. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
The aim of this study was to determine the magnitude of change in estimated cardiovascular disease risk when multiple same day blood pressure measurements are used in estimating coronary heart disease, heart failure and stroke risks.
Black and White participants, N = 11,129, enrolled in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study (mean age 53.9 ± 5.7 (SD) years) were included. Each participant had three sitting, five supine, and six standing blood pressure measures during one day. Main outcome measures were changes in estimated coronary heart disease, heart failure and stroke risk when using the different blood pressure measures. Mean sitting, standing and supine systolic blood pressure values of the study population were 120.8 ± 18.6, 124.9 ± 20 and 124.7 ± 19.6 mmHg, respectively. The substitution of the second sitting systolic blood pressure with the third sitting systolic blood pressure (taken ∼5 min later) in two separate coronary heart disease risk models reclassified 3.3% to 5.1% of study participants. Similar substitutions for heart failure and stroke risk prediction models led to reclassification of 1.9% and 2.7% of participants respectively. When mean sitting systolic blood pressure was replaced with mean standing systolic blood pressure 5.4% to 11.6% of the participants were reclassified. Maximum upward and downward change in an individual's estimated risk was 31% and 26% respectively.
Estimated risks of coronary heart disease, heart failure, and stroke for an individual can change significantly within a day due to changes in systolic blood pressure. Given recommendations to use estimated risk for therapeutic decisions, our study has implications for the use of a single systolic blood pressure in cardiovascular risk estimation.
本研究旨在确定在估计冠心病、心力衰竭和中风风险时,使用同一天多次血压测量值时估计的心血管疾病风险变化幅度。
纳入参加社区动脉粥样硬化风险研究的黑人和白人参与者,共11129人(平均年龄53.9±5.7(标准差)岁)。每位参与者在一天内进行了三次坐位、五次仰卧位和六次站立位血压测量。主要结局指标是使用不同血压测量值时估计的冠心病、心力衰竭和中风风险的变化。研究人群的平均坐位、站立位和仰卧位收缩压值分别为120.8±18.6、124.9±20和124.7±19.6mmHg。在两个独立的冠心病风险模型中,用第三次坐位收缩压(约5分钟后测量)替代第二次坐位收缩压,使3.3%至5.1%的研究参与者重新分类。心力衰竭和中风风险预测模型的类似替代分别导致1.9%和2.7%的参与者重新分类。当用平均站立位收缩压替代平均坐位收缩压时,5.4%至11.6%的参与者被重新分类。个体估计风险的最大上升和下降变化分别为31%和26%。
由于收缩压的变化,个体的冠心病、心力衰竭和中风估计风险在一天内可能会发生显著变化。鉴于建议使用估计风险进行治疗决策,我们的研究对在心血管风险评估中使用单一收缩压具有启示意义。