Suppr超能文献

诊室血压、家庭血压和动态血压与心血管风险的预测。

Office, home, and ambulatory blood pressures as predictors of cardiovascular risk.

出版信息

Hypertension. 2014 Aug;64(2):281-6. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.114.03292.

Abstract

Ambulatory blood pressure (BP) is considered as the gold standard of BP measurement although it has not been shown to be more strongly associated with cardiovascular risk than is home BP. Our objective was to compare the prognostic value of office, home, and ambulatory BP for cardiovascular risk in 502 participants examined in 1992 to 1996. The end point was a composite of cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure hospitalization, and coronary intervention. We assessed the prognostic value of each BP in multivariable-adjusted Cox models. The likelihood χ2 ratio value was used to test whether the addition of a BP variable improved the model’s goodness of fit. After a follow-up of 16.1±3.9 years, 70 participants (13.9%) had experienced ≥1 cardiovascular event. Office (systolic/diastolic hazard ratio per 1/1 mm Hg increase in BP, 1.024/1.018; systolic/diastolic 95% confidence interval, 1.009–1.040/0.994–1.043), home (hazard ratio, 1.029/1.028; 95% confidence interval, 1.013–1.045/1.005–1.052), and 24-hour ambulatory BP (hazard ratio, 1.033/1.049; 95% confidence interval, 1.019–1.047/1.023–1.077) were predictive of cardiovascular events. When all 3 BP variables were included in the model simultaneously, only systolic/diastolic ambulatory BP was a significant predictor of cardiovascular events (P=0.002/<0.001). Home systolic/diastolic BP improved the fit of the model only marginally when added to a model including office BP (χ2=3.0/4.0, P=0.09/0.047). Ambulatory BP, however, improved the fit of model more clearly when added to office and home BP (χ2=9.0/12.3, P=0.001/<0.001). Our findings suggest that ambulatory BP is prognostically superior to office and home BP.

摘要

尽管动态血压(BP)尚未被证明与心血管风险的相关性比家庭 BP 更强,但它仍被认为是 BP 测量的金标准。我们的目的是比较 502 名参与者在 1992 年至 1996 年期间接受的诊室、家庭和动态 BP 对心血管风险的预测价值。终点是心血管死亡率、心肌梗死、卒中等复合终点。我们在多变量调整的 Cox 模型中评估了每个 BP 的预测价值。似然 χ2 比值用于检验是否增加 BP 变量可以改善模型的拟合优度。随访 16.1±3.9 年后,70 名参与者(13.9%)发生了≥1 次心血管事件。诊室(每增加 1/1mmHgBP 的收缩压/舒张压风险比,1.024/1.018;收缩压/舒张压 95%置信区间,1.009–1.040/0.994–1.043)、家庭(风险比,1.029/1.028;95%置信区间,1.013–1.045/1.005–1.052)和 24 小时动态血压(风险比,1.033/1.049;95%置信区间,1.019–1.047/1.023–1.077)均与心血管事件相关。当同时将所有 3 个 BP 变量纳入模型时,只有收缩压/舒张压动态 BP 是心血管事件的显著预测因子(P=0.002/<0.001)。当添加到包含诊室 BP 的模型中时,家庭收缩压/舒张压仅略微改善模型的拟合度(χ2=3.0/4.0,P=0.09/0.047)。然而,当添加到诊室和家庭 BP 时,动态 BP 更明显地改善了模型的拟合度(χ2=9.0/12.3,P=0.001/<0.001)。我们的发现表明,动态 BP 在预测预后方面优于诊室和家庭 BP。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验