Nijenhuis Sharon M, Prange-Lasonder Gerdienke B, Stienen Arno Ha, Rietman Johan S, Buurke Jaap H
1 Roessingh Research and Development, Enschede, the Netherlands.
2 Department of Biomechanical Engineering, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
Clin Rehabil. 2017 Feb;31(2):207-216. doi: 10.1177/0269215516629722. Epub 2016 Jul 10.
To compare user acceptance and arm and hand function changes after technology-supported training at home with conventional exercises in chronic stroke. Secondly, to investigate the relation between training duration and clinical changes.
A randomised controlled trial.
Training at home, evaluation at research institute.
Twenty chronic stroke patients with severely to mildly impaired arm and hand function.
Participants were randomly assigned to six weeks (30 minutes per day, six days a week) of self-administered home-based arm and hand training using either a passive dynamic wrist and hand orthosis combined with computerised gaming exercises (experimental group) or prescribed conventional exercises from an exercise book (control group).
Main outcome measures are the training duration for user acceptance and the Action Research Arm Test for arm and hand function. Secondary outcomes are the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory, Fugl-Meyer assessment, Motor Activity Log, Stroke Impact Scale and grip strength.
The control group reported a higher training duration (189 versus 118 minutes per week, P = 0.025). Perceived motivation was positive and equal between groups ( P = 0.935). No differences in clinical outcomes over training between groups were found (P ⩾ 0.165). Changes in Box and Block Test correlated positively with training duration ( P = 0.001).
Both interventions were accepted. An additional benefit of technology-supported arm and hand training over conventional arm and hand exercises at home was not demonstrated. Training duration in itself is a major contributor to arm and hand function improvements.
比较在慢性卒中患者中,在家进行技术支持训练与传统练习后用户的接受程度以及手臂和手部功能的变化。其次,研究训练时长与临床变化之间的关系。
一项随机对照试验。
在家训练,在研究所进行评估。
20名慢性卒中患者,其手臂和手部功能有重度至轻度受损。
参与者被随机分配,进行为期六周(每天30分钟,每周六天)的在家自行进行的手臂和手部训练,实验组使用被动动态手腕和手部矫形器结合电脑游戏练习,对照组使用练习册中规定的传统练习。
主要结局指标是用户接受训练的时长以及手臂和手部功能的行动研究手臂测试。次要结局指标是内在动机量表、Fugl-Meyer评估、运动活动日志、卒中影响量表和握力。
对照组报告的训练时长更高(每周189分钟对118分钟,P = 0.025)。两组之间感知到的动机是积极且相等的(P = 0.935)。未发现两组在训练后的临床结局存在差异(P⩾0.165)。方块搭积木测试的变化与训练时长呈正相关(P = 0.001)。
两种干预措施都被接受。未证明在家中进行技术支持的手臂和手部训练相较于传统手臂和手部练习有额外益处。训练时长本身是手臂和手部功能改善的主要因素。