Ghasemi Ahmad, Haddadi Kaveh, Khoshakhlagh Mohammad, Ganjeh Hamid Reza
From the Department of Radiology (AG); Orthopaedic Research Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Emam Hospital (KH, HRG); and Orthopaedic Research Center, Mazandaran University of Medical Science, Sari, Iran (MK).
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Feb;95(6):e2746. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002746.
The purpose of this study is to determine the reliability and validity of a goniometric measurement of the vertical angle of the sacrum and sacral angle (SA), and their relationships to lumbar degeneration.A herniated lumbar disc is one of the most frequent medical issues. Investigators in a number of studies have reported associated risk factors for prevalent disc degeneration. Atypical lumbosacral angles and curvature are thought to contribute to the degradation of the spine by many researchers. This study analyzed 360 patients referred to our clinic from 2013 to 2015 due to low back pain. A cross-sectional case-control study was designed in order to compare the sagittal alignment of the lumbosacral area in 3 groups of patients suffering from LBP. A total 120 patients were in a control group with a normal lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), 120 patients had lumbar disk herniation (LDH), and 120 patients had spinal stenosis. From the sagittal plan of lumbar MRI, SA and vertical angle of sacral curvature (VASC) were determined and then analyzed.The means of VASC in these groups were: 38.98 (SD: 6.36 ± 0.58), 40.89 (SD: 7.69 ± 0.69), and 40.54 (SD: 7.13 ± 0.92), respectively (P = 0.089). Moreover, studies of SA in 3 groups showed that the means of SA were: 39.30 (SD: 6.69 ± 0.63), 40.52 (SD: 7.47 ± 0.65), and 35.63 (SD: 6.07 ± 0.79), respectively. Relation between SA and spinal stenosis was just statistically significant (P ≤ 0.05).One significant limitation of our study is the lack of standing MRI for increased accuracy of measurement. However, we were reluctant to give patients needless exposure to radiation from conventional X-ray, and instead used MRI scans. We did not find any significant correlation between the VASC and LDH in lumbar MRI. Also, SA is not an independent risk factor for LDH in men and women. We suggested that there are several biomechanical factors involved in LDH.
本研究的目的是确定测量骶骨垂直角和骶骨角(SA)的测角法的可靠性和有效性,以及它们与腰椎退变的关系。腰椎间盘突出症是最常见的医学问题之一。多项研究的调查人员报告了普遍存在的椎间盘退变的相关危险因素。许多研究人员认为,非典型腰骶角和曲率会导致脊柱退变。本研究分析了2013年至2015年因腰痛转诊至我院门诊的360例患者。设计了一项横断面病例对照研究,以比较3组腰痛患者腰骶部的矢状位排列。对照组共有120例患者腰椎磁共振成像(MRI)正常,120例患者患有腰椎间盘突出症(LDH),120例患者患有椎管狭窄。从腰椎MRI的矢状面确定并分析SA和骶骨曲率垂直角(VASC)。这些组中VASC的平均值分别为:38.98(标准差:6.36±0.58)、40.89(标准差:7.69±0.69)和40.54(标准差:7.13±0.92)(P = 0.089)。此外,3组中SA的研究表明,SA的平均值分别为:39.30(标准差:6.69±0.63)、40.52(标准差:7.47±0.65)和35.63(标准差:6.07±0.79)。SA与椎管狭窄之间的关系仅具有统计学意义(P≤0.05)。本研究的一个显著局限性是缺乏站立位MRI以提高测量准确性。然而,我们不愿让患者不必要地暴露于传统X射线辐射,而是使用了MRI扫描。我们在腰椎MRI中未发现VASC与LDH之间存在任何显著相关性。此外,SA不是男性和女性LDH的独立危险因素。我们认为LDH涉及多种生物力学因素。