Albertine Paul, Borofsky Samuel, Brown Derek, Patel Smita, Lee Woojin, Caputy Anthony, Taheri M Reza
Department of Radiology, The George Washington University, First Floor 900 23rd St NW, Washington, DC, 20037, USA.
Emerg Radiol. 2016 Jun;23(3):207-11. doi: 10.1007/s10140-016-1377-2. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
With advancing technology, the sensitivity of computed tomography (CT) for the detection of traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (tSAH) continues to improve. Increased resolution has allowed for the detection of hemorrhage that is limited to one or two images of the CT exam. At our institution, all patients with a SAH require intensive care unit (ICU) admission, regardless of size. It was our hypothesis that patients with small subarachnoid hemorrhage experience favorable outcomes, and may not require the intensive monitoring offered in the ICU. This retrospective study evaluated 62 patients between 2011 and 2014 who presented to our Level I trauma center emergency room for acute traumatic injuries, and found to have subarachnoid hemorrhages on CT examination. The grade of subarachnoid hemorrhage was determined using previously utilized scoring systems, such as the Fisher, Modified Fisher, and Claassen grading systems. Electronic medical records were used to evaluate for medical decline, neurological decline, neurosurgical intervention, and overall hospital course. Admitting co-morbidities were noted, as were the presence of patient intoxication and use of anticoagulants. Patient outcomes were based on discharge summaries upon which the neurological status of the patient was assessed. Each patient was given a score based on the Glasgow outcome scale. The clinical and imaging profile of 62 patients with traumatic SAH were studied. Of the 62 patients, 0 % underwent neurosurgical intervention, 6.5 % had calvarial fractures, 25.8 % had additional intracranial hemorrhages, 27.4 % of the patients had significant co-morbidities, and 1.6 % of the patients expired. Patients with low-grade tSAH spent less time in the ICU, demonstrated neurological and medical stability during hospitalization. None of the patients with low-grade SAH experienced seizure during their admission. In our study, patients with low-grade tSAH demonstrated favorable clinical outcomes. This suggests that patients may not require as aggressive monitoring as is currently provided for those with tSAH.
随着技术的进步,计算机断层扫描(CT)检测创伤性蛛网膜下腔出血(tSAH)的敏感性持续提高。分辨率的提高使得能够检测到仅局限于CT检查一两个图像上的出血。在我们机构,所有蛛网膜下腔出血患者,无论出血量多少,均需入住重症监护病房(ICU)。我们的假设是,少量蛛网膜下腔出血患者预后良好,可能不需要ICU提供的强化监测。这项回顾性研究评估了2011年至2014年间因急性创伤性损伤到我们一级创伤中心急诊室就诊、CT检查发现有蛛网膜下腔出血的62例患者。蛛网膜下腔出血的分级采用先前使用的评分系统,如Fisher、改良Fisher和Claassen分级系统。使用电子病历评估病情恶化、神经功能恶化、神经外科干预及整个住院过程。记录入院时的合并症,以及患者是否中毒和使用抗凝剂情况。患者的预后基于出院小结,据此评估患者的神经状态。根据格拉斯哥预后量表给每位患者打分。对62例创伤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者的临床和影像学资料进行了研究。62例患者中,0%接受了神经外科干预,6.5%有颅骨骨折,25.8%有其他颅内出血,27.4%的患者有严重合并症,1.6%的患者死亡。低级别tSAH患者在ICU的时间较短,住院期间神经和病情稳定。低级别蛛网膜下腔出血患者住院期间均未发生癫痫发作。在我们的研究中,低级别tSAH患者显示出良好的临床预后。这表明患者可能不需要像目前对tSAH患者那样进行积极的监测。