Gitlin Laura N, Parisi Jeanine, Huang Jin, Winter Laraine, Roth David L
Center for Innovative Care in Aging, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Principal Faculty, Center for Innovative Care in Aging, Baltimore, Maryland.
Gerontologist. 2016 Jun;56(3):e21-31. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnv696. Epub 2016 Feb 13.
Examine psychometric properties of Lawton's Valuation of Life (VOL) scale, a measure of an older adults' assessment of the perceived value of their lives; and whether ratings differ by race (White, Black/African American) and sex.
The 13-item VOL scale was administered at baseline in 2 separate randomized trials (Advancing Better Living for Elders, ABLE; Get Busy Get Better, GBGB) for a total of 527 older adults. Principal component analyses were applied to a subset of ABLE data (subsample 1) and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted on remaining data (subsample 2 and GBGB). Once the factor structure was identified and confirmed, 2 subscales were created, corresponding to optimism and engagement. Convergent validity of total and subscale scores were examined using measures of depressive symptoms, social support, control-oriented strategies, mastery, and behavioral activation. For discriminant validity, indices of health status, physical function, financial strain, cognitive status, and number of falls were examined.
Trial samples (ABLE vs. GBGB) differed by age, race, marital status, education, and employment. Principal component analysis on ABLE subsample 1 (n = 156) yielded two factors subsequently confirmed in confirmatory factor analyses on ABLE subsample 2 (n = 163) and GBGB sample (N = 208) separately. Adequate fit was found for the 2-factor model. Correlational analyses supported strong convergent and discriminant validity. Some statistically significant race and sex differences in subscale scores were found.
VOL measures subjective appraisals of perceived value of life. Consisting of two interrelated subscales, it offers an efficient approach to ascertain personal attributions.
检验劳顿生活价值量表(VOL)的心理测量特性,该量表用于衡量老年人对自身生命感知价值的评估;并探究评分是否因种族(白人、黑人/非裔美国人)和性别而有所不同。
在两项独立的随机试验(促进老年人更好生活,ABLE;积极行动改善健康,GBGB)的基线阶段,对13项VOL量表进行施测,共有527名老年人参与。主成分分析应用于ABLE数据的一个子集(子样本1),验证性因素分析则在其余数据(子样本2和GBGB)上进行。确定并确认因素结构后,创建了两个子量表,分别对应乐观和参与度。使用抑郁症状、社会支持、控制导向策略、掌控感和行为激活等测量指标来检验总量表和子量表得分的聚合效度。对于区分效度,考察了健康状况、身体功能、经济压力、认知状态和跌倒次数等指标。
试验样本(ABLE与GBGB)在年龄、种族、婚姻状况、教育程度和就业情况方面存在差异。对ABLE子样本1(n = 156)进行的主成分分析得出两个因素,随后分别在ABLE子样本2(n = 163)和GBGB样本(N = 208)的验证性因素分析中得到确认。二因素模型拟合良好。相关分析支持了较强的聚合效度和区分效度。在子量表得分上发现了一些具有统计学意义的种族和性别差异。
VOL量表测量了对生命感知价值的主观评估。它由两个相互关联的子量表组成,为确定个人归因提供了一种有效的方法。