Department of Microbiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Cell Rep. 2016 Feb 23;14(7):1632-1640. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.01.049. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
Suppression of innate immune responses during filoviral infection contributes to disease severity. Ebola (EBOV) and Marburg (MARV) viruses each encode a VP35 protein that suppresses RIG-I-like receptor signaling and interferon-α/β (IFN-α/β) production by several mechanisms, including direct binding to double stranded RNA (dsRNA). Here, we demonstrate that in cell culture, MARV infection results in a greater upregulation of IFN responses as compared to EBOV infection. This correlates with differences in the efficiencies by which EBOV and MARV VP35s antagonize RIG-I signaling. Furthermore, structural and biochemical studies suggest that differential recognition of RNA elements by the respective VP35 C-terminal IFN inhibitory domain (IID) rather than affinity for RNA by the respective VP35s is critical for this observation. Our studies reveal functional differences in EBOV versus MARV VP35 RNA binding that result in unexpected differences in the host response to deadly viral pathogens.
在丝状病毒感染期间,先天免疫反应的抑制有助于疾病的严重程度。埃博拉病毒(EBOV)和马尔堡病毒(MARV)各自编码一种 VP35 蛋白,通过多种机制抑制 RIG-I 样受体信号和干扰素-α/β(IFN-α/β)的产生,包括直接与双链 RNA(dsRNA)结合。在这里,我们证明与 EBOV 感染相比,MARV 感染在细胞培养中导致 IFN 反应的更大上调。这与 EBOV 和 MARV VP35 拮抗 RIG-I 信号的效率差异相关。此外,结构和生化研究表明,各自的 VP35 C 末端 IFN 抑制结构域(IID)对 RNA 元件的差异识别而不是各自 VP35s 对 RNA 的亲和力对于这种观察结果至关重要。我们的研究揭示了 EBOV 与 MARV VP35 RNA 结合的功能差异,导致宿主对致命病毒病原体的反应产生意外差异。