Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand; Schuster Family Transplantation Research Center, Renal Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Schuster Family Transplantation Research Center, Renal Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Kidney Res Clin Pract. 2013 Jun;32(2):52-61. doi: 10.1016/j.krcp.2013.04.002. Epub 2013 May 29.
Transplant biopsy has always been the gold standard for assessing the immune response to a kidney allograft (Chandraker A: Diagnostic techniques in the work-up of renal allograft dysfunction-an update. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 8:723-728, 1999). A biopsy is not without risk and is unable to predict rejection and is only diagnostic once rejection has already occurred. However, in the past two decades, we have seen an expansion in assays that can potentially put an end to the "drug level" era, which until now has been one of the few tools available to clinicians for monitoring the immune response. A better understanding of the mechanisms of rejection and tolerance, and technological advances has led to the development of new noninvasive methods to monitor the immune response. In this article, we discuss these new methods and their potential uses in renal transplant recipients.
移植活检一直是评估肾移植免疫反应的金标准(Chandraker A:肾移植功能障碍检查中的诊断技术更新。当前肾脏病与高血压杂志 8:723-728, 1999)。活检并非没有风险,并且无法预测排斥反应,只有在排斥反应已经发生时才能进行诊断。然而,在过去的二十年中,我们已经看到了潜在的能够结束“药物水平”时代的检测方法的扩展,直到现在,这一直是临床医生监测免疫反应的少数工具之一。对排斥和耐受机制的更好理解以及技术进步导致了新的非侵入性方法的发展,以监测免疫反应。在本文中,我们讨论了这些新方法及其在肾移植受者中的潜在用途。