Joseph Rincy, Brown-Manhertz Durline, Ikwuazom Stella, Singleton Joanne K
1. College of Health Professions, Pace University, New York, NY, USA2. The Northeast Institute for Evidence Synthesis and Translation (NEST): a Collaborating Center of the Joanna Briggs Institute.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Jan;14(1):108-39. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2254.
Patient satisfaction and hospital re-admission rates are the two major outcomes for measuring quality of healthcare delivery. Interdisciplinary collaboration, a concept that describes coordination of care between multiple healthcare professionals and patients and families to deliver the highest quality of care across settings, is fundamental to improving patient outcomes. Home hospice care is palliative in nature and is a critical segment of patient care. To date, no systematic review has been undertaken to determine the effectiveness of structured interdisciplinary collaboration in the home hospice setting in relation to patient satisfaction and hospital readmission.
The aim of the review was to synthesize the best available evidence on the effectiveness of structured interdisciplinary collaboration on patient satisfaction and hospital admission and re-admission rates for adults receiving home hospice services.
Adults, male and female (18 years old or older), receiving home hospice services or transitioning from hospital to home hospice servicesThe studies that evaluate interdisciplinary collaboration among the hospice team providing home hospice services in the home care settingsIn this review, randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies were considered for inclusion.Patient satisfaction and all cause hospital admissions and re-admission rates.
Published and unpublished literature in the English language was sought from the inception of the databases through August 15, 2014. The databases searched included: PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Nursing & Allied Health Source, Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition and ProQuest Health Management. A search of grey literature and any relevant homecare/hospice websites was also performed.
There were no studies located that met the inclusion requirements of this review. There were no text or opinion pieces that were specific to structured interdisciplinary collaboration among the hospice team in home care settings on patient satisfaction and hospital readmission.
There is currently no evidence available to determine the effectiveness of structured interdisciplinary collaboration among hospice teams in home care settings in regard to patient satisfaction and hospital readmission.
No conclusive recommendations can be made regarding the effectiveness of structured interdisciplinary collaboration among home hospice teams in home care settings in regard to patient satisfaction and hospital readmission.
Quantitative and qualitative research studies are urgently required to determine the effectiveness of structured interdisciplinary collaboration among home hospice teams in home care settings in regard to patient satisfaction and hospital readmission.
患者满意度和医院再入院率是衡量医疗服务质量的两个主要指标。跨学科协作是一个描述多个医疗专业人员与患者及其家属之间协调护理以在不同环境中提供最高质量护理的概念,对于改善患者预后至关重要。居家临终关怀本质上是姑息性的,是患者护理的关键部分。迄今为止,尚未进行系统评价以确定居家临终关怀环境中结构化跨学科协作对患者满意度和医院再入院的有效性。
本评价的目的是综合现有最佳证据,以了解结构化跨学科协作对接受居家临终关怀服务的成年人的患者满意度、医院入院和再入院率的有效性。
年龄在18岁及以上的成年男性和女性,接受居家临终关怀服务或从医院过渡到居家临终关怀服务;评估在家庭护理环境中提供居家临终关怀服务的临终关怀团队之间跨学科协作的研究;在本评价中,纳入随机对照试验和准实验研究;患者满意度以及所有原因导致的医院入院和再入院率。
从数据库建立之初至2014年8月15日,检索英文的已发表和未发表文献。检索的数据库包括:PubMed、护理及相关健康文献累积索引(CINAHL)、EMBASE、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)、护理及相关健康资源库、健康资源库:护理/学术版和ProQuest健康管理库。还对灰色文献以及任何相关的家庭护理/临终关怀网站进行了检索。
未找到符合本评价纳入要求的研究。没有针对居家护理环境中临终关怀团队之间结构化跨学科协作对患者满意度和医院再入院的具体文本或观点文章。
目前尚无证据可确定居家护理环境中临终关怀团队之间结构化跨学科协作对患者满意度和医院再入院的有效性。
关于居家护理环境中居家临终关怀团队之间结构化跨学科协作对患者满意度和医院再入院的有效性,无法给出确凿建议。
迫切需要进行定量和定性研究,以确定居家护理环境中居家临终关怀团队之间结构化跨学科协作对患者满意度和医院再入院的有效性。