Yan Shengmin, Zhang Hongxia, Guo Xuejiang, Wang Jianshe, Dai Jiayin
Key Laboratory of Animal Ecology and Conservation Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, People's Republic of China.
State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, People's Republic of China.
Arch Toxicol. 2017 Jan;91(1):247-258. doi: 10.1007/s00204-016-1675-1. Epub 2016 Feb 15.
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) has been shown to cause hepatotoxicity and other toxicological effects. Though PPARα activation by PFOA in the liver has been well accepted as an important mechanism of PFOA-induced hepatotoxicity, several pieces of evidence have shown that the hepatotoxic effects of PFOA may not be fully explained by PPARα activation. In this study, we observed autophagosome accumulation in mouse livers as well as HepG2 cells after PFOA exposure. Further in vitro study revealed that the accumulation of autophagosomes was not caused by autophagic flux stimulation. In addition, we observed that PFOA exposure affected the proteolytic activity of HepG2 cells while significant dysfunction of lysosomes was not detected. Quantitative proteomic analysis of crude lysosomal fractions from HepG2 cells treated with PFOA revealed that 54 differentially expressed proteins were related to autophagy or vesicular trafficking and fusion. The proteomic results were further validated in the cells in vitro and livers in vivo after PFOA exposure, which implied potential dysfunction at the late stage of autophagy. However, in HepG2 cells, it seemed that further inhibition of autophagy did not significantly alter the effects of PFOA on cell viability. Although these findings demonstrate that PFOA blocked autophagy and disturbed intracellular vesicle fusion in the liver, the changes in autophagy were observed only at high cytotoxic concentrations of PFOA, suggesting that autophagy may not be a primary target or mode of toxicity. Furthermore, since altered liver autophagy was not observed at concentrations of PFOA associated with human exposures, the relevance of these findings must be questioned.
全氟辛酸(PFOA)已被证明会导致肝毒性和其他毒理学效应。尽管PFOA在肝脏中激活过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体α(PPARα)已被公认为是PFOA诱导肝毒性的重要机制,但有几条证据表明,PFOA的肝毒性作用可能无法完全用PPARα激活来解释。在本研究中,我们观察到PFOA暴露后小鼠肝脏以及HepG2细胞中自噬体的积累。进一步的体外研究表明,自噬体的积累不是由自噬流刺激引起的。此外,我们观察到PFOA暴露会影响HepG2细胞的蛋白水解活性,而未检测到溶酶体的明显功能障碍。对用PFOA处理的HepG2细胞的粗溶酶体部分进行定量蛋白质组学分析发现,54种差异表达蛋白与自噬或囊泡运输及融合有关。蛋白质组学结果在PFOA暴露后的体外细胞和体内肝脏中得到了进一步验证,这暗示了自噬后期可能存在潜在功能障碍。然而,在HepG2细胞中,进一步抑制自噬似乎并未显著改变PFOA对细胞活力的影响。尽管这些发现表明PFOA在肝脏中阻断了自噬并扰乱了细胞内囊泡融合,但自噬的变化仅在高细胞毒性浓度的PFOA下观察到,这表明自噬可能不是主要的毒性靶点或毒性模式。此外,由于在与人类接触相关的PFOA浓度下未观察到肝脏自噬的改变,这些发现的相关性必须受到质疑。