Natrajan Rachael, Sailem Heba, Mardakheh Faraz K, Arias Garcia Mar, Tape Christopher J, Dowsett Mitch, Bakal Chris, Yuan Yinyin
Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
PLoS Med. 2016 Feb 16;13(2):e1001961. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001961. eCollection 2016 Feb.
The intra-tumor diversity of cancer cells is under intense investigation; however, little is known about the heterogeneity of the tumor microenvironment that is key to cancer progression and evolution. We aimed to assess the degree of microenvironmental heterogeneity in breast cancer and correlate this with genomic and clinical parameters.
We developed a quantitative measure of microenvironmental heterogeneity along three spatial dimensions (3-D) in solid tumors, termed the tumor ecosystem diversity index (EDI), using fully automated histology image analysis coupled with statistical measures commonly used in ecology. This measure was compared with disease-specific survival, key mutations, genome-wide copy number, and expression profiling data in a retrospective study of 510 breast cancer patients as a test set and 516 breast cancer patients as an independent validation set. In high-grade (grade 3) breast cancers, we uncovered a striking link between high microenvironmental heterogeneity measured by EDI and a poor prognosis that cannot be explained by tumor size, genomics, or any other data types. However, this association was not observed in low-grade (grade 1 and 2) breast cancers. The prognostic value of EDI was superior to known prognostic factors and was enhanced with the addition of TP53 mutation status (multivariate analysis test set, p = 9 × 10-4, hazard ratio = 1.47, 95% CI 1.17-1.84; validation set, p = 0.0011, hazard ratio = 1.78, 95% CI 1.26-2.52). Integration with genome-wide profiling data identified losses of specific genes on 4p14 and 5q13 that were enriched in grade 3 tumors with high microenvironmental diversity that also substratified patients into poor prognostic groups. Limitations of this study include the number of cell types included in the model, that EDI has prognostic value only in grade 3 tumors, and that our spatial heterogeneity measure was dependent on spatial scale and tumor size.
To our knowledge, this is the first study to couple unbiased measures of microenvironmental heterogeneity with genomic alterations to predict breast cancer clinical outcome. We propose a clinically relevant role of microenvironmental heterogeneity for advanced breast tumors, and highlight that ecological statistics can be translated into medical advances for identifying a new type of biomarker and, furthermore, for understanding the synergistic interplay of microenvironmental heterogeneity with genomic alterations in cancer cells.
癌细胞的肿瘤内异质性正受到深入研究;然而,对于肿瘤微环境的异质性(这是癌症进展和演变的关键)却知之甚少。我们旨在评估乳腺癌微环境异质性的程度,并将其与基因组和临床参数相关联。
我们利用全自动化组织学图像分析结合生态学中常用的统计方法,开发了一种在实体瘤中沿三个空间维度(3-D)定量测量微环境异质性的方法,称为肿瘤生态系统多样性指数(EDI)。在一项对510例乳腺癌患者作为测试集和516例乳腺癌患者作为独立验证集的回顾性研究中,将该测量方法与疾病特异性生存率、关键突变、全基因组拷贝数和表达谱数据进行了比较。在高级别(3级)乳腺癌中,我们发现通过EDI测量的高微环境异质性与不良预后之间存在显著关联,而肿瘤大小、基因组学或任何其他数据类型均无法解释这种关联。然而,在低级别(1级和2级)乳腺癌中未观察到这种关联。EDI的预后价值优于已知的预后因素,并且在加入TP53突变状态后得到增强(多变量分析测试集,p = 9×10-4,风险比 = 1.47,95%置信区间1.17 - 1.84;验证集,p = 0.0011,风险比 = 1.78,95%置信区间1.26 - 2.52)。与全基因组分析数据整合后,确定了4p14和5q13上特定基因的缺失,这些缺失在具有高微环境多样性的3级肿瘤中富集,并且也将患者分层为不良预后组。本研究的局限性包括模型中包含的细胞类型数量、EDI仅在3级肿瘤中具有预后价值,以及我们的空间异质性测量依赖于空间尺度和肿瘤大小。
据我们所知,这是第一项将微环境异质性的无偏测量与基因组改变相结合以预测乳腺癌临床结局的研究。我们提出微环境异质性在晚期乳腺癌中具有临床相关作用,并强调生态统计学可转化为医学进展,用于识别新型生物标志物,此外,还用于理解微环境异质性与癌细胞基因组改变之间的协同相互作用。