Suppr超能文献

本土声音、自我概念与个性化语音技术的道德考量

Native voice, self-concept and the moral case for personalized voice technology.

作者信息

Nathanson Esther

机构信息

a The Neiswanger Institute for Bioethics, Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine , Maywood , IL , USA.

出版信息

Disabil Rehabil. 2017 Jan;39(1):73-81. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2016.1139193. Epub 2016 Feb 16.

Abstract

Purpose (1) To explore the role of native voice and effects of voice loss on self-concept and identity, and survey the state of assistive voice technology; (2) to establish the moral case for developing personalized voice technology. Methods This narrative review examines published literature on the human significance of voice, the impact of voice loss on self-concept and identity, and the strengths and limitations of current voice technology. Based on the impact of voice loss on self and identity, and voice technology limitations, the moral case for personalized voice technology is developed. Results Given the richness of information conveyed by voice, loss of voice constrains expression of the self, but the full impact is poorly understood. Augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) devices facilitate communication but, despite advances in this field, voice output cannot yet express the unique nuances of individual voice. The ethical principles of autonomy, beneficence and equality of opportunity establish the moral responsibility to invest in accessible, cost-effective, personalized voice technology. Conclusions Although further research is needed to elucidate the full effects of voice loss on self-concept, identity and social functioning, current understanding of the profoundly negative impact of voice loss establishes the moral case for developing personalized voice technology. Implications for Rehabilitation Rehabilitation of voice-disordered patients should facilitate self-expression, interpersonal connectedness and social/occupational participation. Proactive questioning about the psychological and social experiences of patients with voice loss is a valuable entry point for rehabilitation planning. Personalized voice technology would enhance sense of self, communicative participation and autonomy and promote shared healthcare decision-making. Further research is needed to identify the best strategies to preserve and strengthen identity and sense of self.

摘要

目的 (1)探讨原声的作用以及声音丧失对自我概念和身份认同的影响,并调查辅助语音技术的现状;(2)确立开发个性化语音技术的道德依据。方法 本叙述性综述考察了已发表的关于声音的人类意义、声音丧失对自我概念和身份认同的影响以及当前语音技术的优势和局限性的文献。基于声音丧失对自我和身份认同的影响以及语音技术的局限性,提出了开发个性化语音技术的道德依据。结果 鉴于声音所传达信息的丰富性,声音丧失会限制自我表达,但对此的全面影响尚不清楚。辅助和替代沟通(AAC)设备有助于沟通,然而,尽管该领域取得了进展,但语音输出仍无法表达个体声音的独特细微差别。自主、行善和机会平等的伦理原则确立了投资于可及、经济高效的个性化语音技术的道德责任。结论 尽管需要进一步研究以阐明声音丧失对自我概念、身份认同和社会功能的全面影响,但目前对声音丧失的深远负面影响的理解确立了开发个性化语音技术的道德依据。对康复的启示 声音障碍患者的康复应促进自我表达、人际联系以及社会/职业参与。主动询问声音丧失患者的心理和社会经历是康复计划的一个有价值的切入点。个性化语音技术将增强自我意识、沟通参与和自主性,并促进共同的医疗保健决策。需要进一步研究以确定保护和强化身份认同和自我意识的最佳策略。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验