Malyutina Svetlana, Richardson Jessica D, den Ouden Dirk B
Neurolinguistics Laboratory, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia.
Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.
Semin Speech Lang. 2016 Feb;37(1):34-47. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1572383. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
Previous research has found that verb argument structure characteristics (such as the number of participant roles in the situation described by the verb) can facilitate or hinder aphasic language production and comprehension in constrained laboratory tasks. This research needs to be complemented by studies of narrative or unrestricted speech, which can capture the spontaneous selection of verbs and grammatical structures by people with aphasia and may be particularly sensitive to the relative cost of access to different verb types in more natural conditions. Focusing on the number of subcategorization options, we investigated verb argument structure effects in a large sample of narratives from AphasiaBank, by speakers with aphasia, as well as control speakers without brain damage. Verb argument structure complexity did not negatively affect verb selection in any type of aphasia. However, people with aphasia, particularly with Broca's aphasia, used verbs in less complex and diverse ways, with fewer arguments and less diverse subcategorization options. In line with previous research, this suggests that deficits in verb use in aphasia are likely due to difficulties with the online application of or partial damage to verb argument structure knowledge.
先前的研究发现,动词论元结构特征(例如动词所描述情境中的参与者角色数量)在受限的实验室任务中能够促进或阻碍失语症患者的语言产出及理解。这项研究需要通过对叙事性或不受限制言语的研究加以补充,这类研究能够捕捉失语症患者对动词和语法结构的自发选择,并且在更自然的条件下,可能对获取不同动词类型的相对成本特别敏感。我们聚焦于次范畴化选项的数量,通过失语症语料库中失语症患者以及无脑部损伤的对照者所讲述的大量叙事样本,研究了动词论元结构的影响。动词论元结构的复杂性在任何类型的失语症中都不会对动词选择产生负面影响。然而,失语症患者,尤其是布罗卡失语症患者,使用动词的方式不那么复杂和多样,其论元较少,次范畴化选项也较少。与先前的研究一致,这表明失语症患者动词使用方面的缺陷可能是由于动词论元结构知识的在线应用困难或部分受损所致。