Figueras Jaume, Bañeras Jordi, Peña-Gil Carlos, Barrabés José A, Rodriguez Palomares Jose, Garcia Dorado David
Servei de Cardiologia, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain
Servei de Cardiologia, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Feb 16;5(2):e002581. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002581.
Long-term prognosis of acute pulmonary edema (APE) remains ill defined.
We evaluated demographic, echocardiographic, and angiographic data of 806 consecutive patients with APE with (CAD) and without coronary artery disease (non-CAD) admitted from 2000 to 2010. Differences between hospital and long-term mortality and its predictors were also assessed. CAD patients (n=638) were older and had higher incidence of diabetes and peripheral vascular disease than non-CAD (n=168), and lower ejection fraction. Hospital mortality was similar in both groups (26.5% vs 31.5%; P=0.169) but APE recurrence was higher in CAD patients (17.3% vs 6.5%; P<0.001). Age, admission systolic blood pressure, recurrence of APE, and need for inotropics or endotracheal intubation were the main independent predictors of hospital mortality. In contrast, overall mortality (70.0% vs 57.1%; P=0.002) and readmission for nonfatal heart failure after a 45-month follow-up (10-140; 17.3% vs 7.6%; P=0.009) were higher in CAD than in non-CAD patients. Age, peripheral vascular disease, and peak creatine kinase MB during index hospitalization, but not ejection fraction, were the main independent predictors of overall mortality, whereas coronary revascularization or valvular surgery were protective. These interventions were mostly performed during hospitalization index (294 of 307; 96%) and not intervened patients showed a higher risk profile.
Long-term mortality in APE is high and higher in CAD than in non-CAD patients. Considering the different in-hospital and long-term mortality predictors herein described, which do not necessarily involve systolic function, it is conceivable that a more aggressive interventional program might improve survival in high-risk patients.
急性肺水肿(APE)的长期预后仍不明确。
我们评估了2000年至2010年收治的806例连续性APE患者的人口统计学、超声心动图和血管造影数据,这些患者伴有(CAD)或不伴有冠状动脉疾病(非CAD)。还评估了住院和长期死亡率的差异及其预测因素。CAD患者(n = 638)比非CAD患者(n = 168)年龄更大,糖尿病和外周血管疾病的发生率更高,射血分数更低。两组的住院死亡率相似(26.5%对31.5%;P = 0.169),但CAD患者的APE复发率更高(17.3%对6.5%;P < 0.001)。年龄、入院收缩压、APE复发以及使用血管活性药物或气管插管的需求是住院死亡率的主要独立预测因素。相比之下,CAD患者45个月随访后的总体死亡率(70.0%对57.1%;P = 0.002)和非致命性心力衰竭再入院率(10 - 140;17.3%对7.6%;P = 0.009)高于非CAD患者。年龄、外周血管疾病以及首次住院期间肌酸激酶MB峰值是总体死亡率的主要独立预测因素,而射血分数不是,冠状动脉血运重建或瓣膜手术具有保护作用。这些干预大多在首次住院期间进行(307例中的294例;96%)且未接受干预的患者风险特征更高。
APE的长期死亡率很高,CAD患者高于非CAD患者。考虑到本文所述的不同住院和长期死亡率预测因素,这些因素不一定涉及收缩功能,可以设想更积极的干预方案可能会改善高危患者的生存率。